题目内容
【题目】---I think the invention of the Internet has changed people’s daily life __________.
---I totally agree with you.
A. in the way B. in a way
C. on the way D. by the way
【答案】B
【解析】考查介词短语辨析。句意：——我觉得网络的发明已经在某种程度上改变了人们的生活方式。——我非常同意你。A. in the way妨碍，挡道；B. in a way在某种程度上；C. on the way在……途中；D. by the way顺便说，顺便问一下。这里指网络在某种程度上改变了人们的生活。故选B。
名师导航单元期末冲刺100分系列答案
名校名卷单元同步训练测试题系列答案【题目】七选五
A. Healthy way of life giving way to overuse of medicine |
（1）
The use of health supplements such as multivitamin tablets has increased greatly in the western world. People take these supplements because advertising suggests that they prevent a range of medical conditions from developing. However, there is concern that people are consuming worryingly high doses of these supplements and the European Union (EU) has issued a directive that will ban the sale of a wide range of them. This EU directive should be supported.
2
Research suggests that people who take Vitamin C supplements of over 5000 milligrams a day are more likely to develop cancer. This shows how much damage these health supplements do to people’s health. A spokesman for the health supplement industry has argued that other research shows that Vitamin C supplements help prevent heart disease, but we can dismiss this evidence as it is from a biased source.
3
Science fiction of the 1960s and 1970s predicted that pills would replace meals as the way in which people would get the fuel they needed. This, it was argued, would mean a more efficient use of time as people wouldn’t have to waste it preparing or eating meals. The EU directive would help prevent this nightmare of pills replacing food becoming a reality.
4
Peop0le already take too many pills instead of adopting a healthier lifestyle. For example, the consumption of painkillers in Britain in 1998 was 21 tablets per year for every man, woman and child in the country. People do not need all these pills.
5
Some might argue that the EU directive denies people’s right to freedom of choice. However, there are many legal examples for such intervention when it is in the individual’s best interests. We now make people wear seatbelts rather than allowing them to choose to do so. Opposing the EU directive would mean beneficial measures like this would be threatened.