题目内容
【题目】根据短文内容,从短文后的选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。
Building Trust in a Relationship Again
Trust is a learned behavior that we gain from past experiences. 【1】 Trust is a risk. But you can’t be successful when there’s a lack of trust in a relationship that results from an action where the wrongdoer takes no responsibility to fix the mistake.
Unfortunately, we’ve all been victims of betrayal. Whether we’ve been suffer from, lied to, misled, or cheated on, there are different levels of losing trust. Sometimes people simply can’t trust anymore. 【3】 It’s understandable, but if you’re willing to build trust in a relationship again, we have some steps you can take to get you there.
【4】 Having confidence in yourself will help you make better choices because you can see what the best outcome would be for your well-being.
【5】 If you’ve been betrayed, you are the victim of your circumstance. But there’s a difference between being a victim and living with a “victim mentality”. At some point in all of our lives, we’ll have our trust tested or violated.
You didn’t lose “everything”. Once trust is lost, what is left? Instead of looking at the situation from this hopeless angle, look at everything you still have and be thankful for all of the good in your life. 【6】 Instead, it’s a healthy way to work through the experience to allow room for positive growth and forgiveness.
A. Learn to really trust yourself.
B. It is putting confidence in someone.
C. Stop regarding yourself as the victim.
D.
E. They’ve been too badly hurt and they can’t bear to let it happen again.
F. This knowledge carries over in their attitude toward their future relationships.
G. Seeing the positive side of things doesn’t mean you’re ignoring what happened.
【答案】
【1】B
【2】E
【3】A
【4】C
【5】G
【解析】
试题分析:
【1】B前文提到信任是在过去的基础上形成的,是对某人的自信,所以答案是B。
【2】E前文提到优势我们会受到背叛的伤害,使我们不再相信别人,他们受到了严重的伤害他们不能容忍这种情况再次发生所以答案是E。
【3】A 此段下文讲到了相信他人的优点,所以此处应是学习相信他人所以答案是A。
【4】C此段下文讲到如果遭到了背叛后,作在受害者与做“精神上”的受害者是有很大去别的,所以不要把自己当作是受害者,所以答案是C。
【5】G本段讲述以积极的心态去面对,虽然失去了信任但还有好的方面,但也不能一味的看到哦积极的方面而忽视所发生的事情,所以答案是G。
【题目】书面表达
写作要求:对于“中学生是否应该带手机”,同学们各自持有不同的观点,请你根据下表内容的提示,用英语写一篇短文。陈述同学们的观点及理由,并谈谈你的观点及理由,发表在校园网的论坛上。不少于100个单词。
观点 | 理由 |
支持中学生带手机 | 1.方便学生与家长之间的联系。 2.便于学校通过手机短信发送通知。 |
反对中学生带手机 | 1.部分学生上课玩手机导致无法专心学习。 2. 带手机到学校并不安全,容易被盗。 |
你的理由和观点。 |
【题目】请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。
注意:每个空格只填一个单词。
Commercial advertisement was once thought of as a technique of the marketers to inform the potential buyers about the availability of certain products. It was seen more as a medium to inform the buyers rather than persuade them to buy. The present day marketers see advertisement as a medium to damage the image of their competitors and their products. This indeed, is an undesirable and an immoral practice. Instead of speaking about their own products, these marketers speak about the drawbacks (often without any basics) of the competing products.
People watching TV advertisements would notice that there has always been an advertisement war between the marketers of different consumer goods. A few such cases are given below.
1. Parachute Coconut Oil vs. V.V.D. Gold
Some time back, the producer of V.V.D Gold Coconut Oil claimed in their TV advertisement that only their products was superior and the one sold in blue colour bottles (the reference was to Parachute coconut oil) was suitable only for un-natural hair.
2. Tata Salt vs. Captain Cook
Tata salt was first iodised (碘处理) salt marketed by an Indian Company. It has been enjoying a good and steady market. Captain Cook, another producer of iodised salt, who entered the market later, had to adopt some strategy to get control of the market. The TV advertisement of Captain Cook stressed on ‘Free flow’ of their salt when transferred to a container. The producer of Tata Salt retaliated (报复) by saying that the claim of Captain Cook was a trick and those who were quality conscious should deal with it with caution.
3. Pepsi vs. Coco Cola
Coca Cola was selected as the official soft drink for the Wills World Cricket 1996. When the cricket series was on, the marketers of Pepsi constantly advertised on TV. Their advertisement gave the idea that the cricketers preferred only Pepsi and as a matter of fact there was nothing official about it.
4. Horlicks vs. Complan
Sometime back, the TV advertisement of Complan, a health drink directly attacked Horlicks, which has been in the market for several decades. The claim of Complan was that their brand (which according to them was Brand C) has a higher percentage of ingredients (材料) compared to Brand H (reference was nothing but to Horlicks).
The above examples clearly show how the technique of advertisement is misused by some marketers to ruin the image of their competitors. This, certainly, is not a healthy trend.
Any marketer should only speak about his products and not about his competitors’ products. The awareness of consumers has certainly increased over the years and they are no longer easily taken in. There are many consumer products like salt, oil shaving blades etc. But one thing for sure is that offering the same product in a different container will not make the product different.
Mass media like Radio, Television and newspaper should not allow advertisements that tell lies. Legal regulations, in this regard, should also be made stricter.
Comparison of the past and the present of advertisements | ||
In the past | At present | |
A technique mainly used for offering 【1】 | A trick used as a means of unfair 【2】 | |
The 【3】 of advertisement | ||
【4】 | Products | Wrong practices |
V.V.D. Gold | When V.V.D Gold attacked the one sold in blue bottles, it 【5】to Parachute Coconut oil. | |
Captain Cook | Captain Cook stressed on their “free flow” when their product was 【6】to a container. | |
Tata Salt | Tata salt retaliated by warning consumers to be 【7】about the quality. | |
Pepsi | Too much advertisement on TV seemed to say that the cricketers had a 【8】for Pepsi. | |
Complan | Brand C claimed that their product was much richer in ingredients in【9】with Brand H. | |
Solutions | 【10】products. are not allowed to be mentioned in the advertisement. Stricter laws should be made to protect every producers’ and consumers’ benefits. |