题目内容
【题目】请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。
注意:每个空格只填一个单词。
Commercial advertisement was once thought of as a technique of the marketers to inform the potential buyers about the availability of certain products. It was seen more as a medium to inform the buyers rather than persuade them to buy. The present day marketers see advertisement as a medium to damage the image of their competitors and their products. This indeed, is an undesirable and an immoral practice. Instead of speaking about their own products, these marketers speak about the drawbacks (often without any basics) of the competing products.
People watching TV advertisements would notice that there has always been an advertisement war between the marketers of different consumer goods. A few such cases are given below.
1. Parachute Coconut Oil vs. V.V.D. Gold
Some time back, the producer of V.V.D Gold Coconut Oil claimed in their TV advertisement that only their products was superior and the one sold in blue colour bottles (the reference was to Parachute coconut oil) was suitable only for un-natural hair.
2. Tata Salt vs. Captain Cook
Tata salt was first iodised (碘处理) salt marketed by an Indian Company. It has been enjoying a good and steady market. Captain Cook, another producer of iodised salt, who entered the market later, had to adopt some strategy to get control of the market. The TV advertisement of Captain Cook stressed on ‘Free flow’ of their salt when transferred to a container. The producer of Tata Salt retaliated (报复) by saying that the claim of Captain Cook was a trick and those who were quality conscious should deal with it with caution.
3. Pepsi vs. Coco Cola
Coca Cola was selected as the official soft drink for the Wills World Cricket 1996. When the cricket series was on, the marketers of Pepsi constantly advertised on TV. Their advertisement gave the idea that the cricketers preferred only Pepsi and as a matter of fact there was nothing official about it.
4. Horlicks vs. Complan
Sometime back, the TV advertisement of Complan, a health drink directly attacked Horlicks, which has been in the market for several decades. The claim of Complan was that their brand (which according to them was Brand C) has a higher percentage of ingredients (材料) compared to Brand H (reference was nothing but to Horlicks).
The above examples clearly show how the technique of advertisement is misused by some marketers to ruin the image of their competitors. This, certainly, is not a healthy trend.
Any marketer should only speak about his products and not about his competitors’ products. The awareness of consumers has certainly increased over the years and they are no longer easily taken in. There are many consumer products like salt, oil shaving blades etc. But one thing for sure is that offering the same product in a different container will not make the product different.
Mass media like Radio, Television and newspaper should not allow advertisements that tell lies. Legal regulations, in this regard, should also be made stricter.
Comparison of the past and the present of advertisements | ||
In the past | At present | |
A technique mainly used for offering 【1】 | A trick used as a means of unfair 【2】 | |
The 【3】 of advertisement | ||
【4】 | Products | Wrong practices |
V.V.D. Gold | When V.V.D Gold attacked the one sold in blue bottles, it 【5】to Parachute Coconut oil. | |
Captain Cook | Captain Cook stressed on their “free flow” when their product was 【6】to a container. | |
Tata Salt | Tata salt retaliated by warning consumers to be 【7】about the quality. | |
Pepsi | Too much advertisement on TV seemed to say that the cricketers had a 【8】for Pepsi. | |
Complan | Brand C claimed that their product was much richer in ingredients in【9】with Brand H. | |
Solutions | 【10】products. are not allowed to be mentioned in the advertisement. Stricter laws should be made to protect every producers’ and consumers’ benefits. |
【答案】
【1】information
【2】competition
【3】misuse
【4】Examples / Cases
【5】referred
【6】transferred
【7】cautious/careful
【8】preference
【9】comparison
【10】Competitors’
【解析】
试题分析:请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。
注意:每个空格只填一个单词。
【1】information 根据句意可知:一项技术主要是用来提供信息。故填information。
【2】competition 根据句意:一个骗局被看做不公平的竞争。故填competition。
【3】misuse 根据文章内容可知:广告的滥用。故填misuse。
【4】Examples / Cases 根据表格可知这是举的例子,故填Examples / Cases。注意大写开头。
【5】referred 根据句意可知:它涉及到Parachute Coconut oil.。refer to涉及到,谈到。过去式注意双写,故填referred。
【6】transferred 句意:当他们的产品被转移到一个容器里的时候,此处用过去分词,故填transferred。
【7】cautious/careful 句意:警告顾客要小心质量。be cautious/careful about 对---小心,故填cautious/careful。
【8】preference 电视上太多的广告似乎在说板球运动员对百事可乐有一个偏好。have a preference for对---有偏好,故填preference。
【9】comparison 句意:Brand C声称他们的产品在配料上与Brand H相比更丰富。故填comparison。
【10】Competitors’ 句意:竞争对手的产品不允许在广告里提到。此处用名词所有格形式,故填Competitors’。注意大写开头。
【知识归纳】
1.compare...with...把……和……比较(常表示同类相比,比较)
compare...to...把……比作……(常表示异类相比,比喻)
①Let's compare this photo with that one. 让我们把这张照片和那张照片作一下比较。
②Children are often compared to happy birds. 孩子常常被比喻成幸福的小鸟。
2.Compared to/with---,----。与---相比较。Compared to those boys,you are lucky.与那些男孩相比较,你是幸运的。
3. comparison比较(名词) in comparison with与---比较起来。比如第79小题comparison 句意:Brand C声称他们的产品在配料上与Brand H相比更丰富。故填comparison。