题目内容
15.Not very long ago,the question would have seemed absurd.Now it is on the lips of respected scientists; MPs(议员) are beginning to talk of"a war on sugar",and even England's chief medical officer has said sugar may have to be,like the old enemy tobacco,taxed in order to protect the nation's health.There came a time in the evolution of public attitudes to smoking,when the doctors had been shouting for long enough that the public was broadly aware of the risks and the only question left,for Government was:what should we do about it?
Some believe we are now at the same point in our attitudes to sugar.Others-largely but not only representatives of the food and drink industry-say the entire debate has been skewed,(歪曲) by those who spread stories deliberately to make people nervous.
More or less everyone agrees that eating too much sugar is bad for you.There is also no doubt obesity is a growing problem which is putting a significant,avoidable burden on the NHS by increasing the rates of diabetes,heart disease and other long-term conditions.
But to what extent is sugar-rather than saturated fats,or salt,carbohydrates or proteins,or any of the other devils of modem diets-the cause of obesity and how much should we worry about it?
Yesterday,hopes of achieving anything resembling clarity(清楚) from the World Health Organization (WHO) were confused once again,which,widely expected to reduce the recommended sugar intake by a half in new draft guidance,instead said it would continue to recommend that sugar make up no more than 10per cent of the energy we consume,while adding that cutting this to five per cent would have"additional benefits".The decision will now go out to public consultation.
Simon Capewell,professor of the University of Liverpool,said that he suspected"dirty work"on the part of food and drinks companies might lie behind the WHO's less than resounding message.
"The food industry say Government has no business interfering(介入) in families,we must protect personal choice,"Professor Capewell said."We say there is no personal choice.At the moment,a mother can walk into a supermarket with a choice of four tomato soups-with three,or four,or five teaspoons of sugar in them.She has a choice of thousands of ready meals-with five,or six,or even nine teaspoons of sugar in."
59.By referring to smoking the author indicates thatB.
A.sugar has just turned out to be as harmful as smoking
B.it is not easy for authorities to restrict or ban something
C.it is easy for people to see bad effects of something
D.people must see the disadvantages of sugar immediately
60.WHO has changed its idea mainly becauseC.
A.it thinks the danger of sugar to health is overemphasized
B.it finds it safe to take in as much sugar as people do now
C.it believes certain amount of intake of sugar does us good
D.it has been put under pressure by food and drinks companies
61.When reporting the argument about sugar,the author seems toB.
A.remain objective B.stand by those against it
C.believe it harmless D.hold the view of"wait-and-see"
62.Which of the following can be the proper title for the passage?A
A.Is sugar the new evil?B.How much sugar do you take daily?
C.Is sugar to be taxed?D.How much do you know about sugar?
分析 本文属于说明文阅读,作者通过这篇文章主要向我们描述了糖是我们生活中的必需品,和烟一样,人们已经知道,食用过多的糖对人体有害,但是科学家表示食用适量的糖对身体有额外的好处,因此我们一定要控制糖的摄入量,有利于身体健康.
解答 59.B.推理判断题.根据文章第二段"There came a time in the evolution of public attitudes to smoking,when the doctors had been shouting for long enough that the public was broadly aware of the risks and the only question left,for Government was:what should we do about it?和第三段"Some believe we are now at the same point in our attitudes to sugar.Others"可知无论在禁烟还是禁止糖上,对于权力机构来说是很难的.故选B.
60.C.推理判断题.根据文章第六段"while adding that cutting this to five per cent would have"additional benefits".可知他们改变主意是因为他们认为吃适量的糖对我们的身体有好处.故选C.
61.B.细节理解题.根据文章第五段"But to what extent is sugar-rather than saturated fats,or salt,carbohydrates or proteins,or any of the other devils of modem diets-the cause of obesity and how much should we worry about it?"作者提出的看法,第六段作者用事例来说明他是支持那些反对禁糖的人.故选B.
62.A 主旨大意题.通读全文,可知文章主要讲糖是我们生活中的必需品,和烟一样,人们已经知道,食用过多的糖对人体有害,但是科学家表示食用适量的糖对身体有额外的好处.可知文章是关于糖是不是新的罪恶之源吗?故选A.
点评 考察学生的细节理解和推理判断能力,做细节理解题时一定要找到文章中的原句,和题干进行比较,再做出正确的选择.在做推理判断题不要以个人的主观想象代替文章的事实,要根据文章事实进行合乎逻辑的推理判断.
A. | confirm | B. | equal | C. | continue | D. | guarantee |