Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a stricter nationwide health standard for smog-causing pollutants that would bring substantial benefits to millions of Americans. With a final rule expected by the end of this month, some opponents, mainly from industrial and oil-producing states, are pushing back. They say investments required to produce cleaner air are too expensive and not scientifically justified.

Lisa Jackson, the E.P.A. administrator, needs to stick to her guns. This is only the first of several political tests to come this fall, as she also seeks to tighten rules governing individual pollutants like mercury and global warming gases like carbon dioxide.

The health standard she is proposing covers ground-level ozone, commonly known as smog, which is formed when sunlight mixes with pollutants from factories, refineries, power plants and automobiles. Ozone is a major health threat, contributing to heart disease and various respiratory (呼吸道的) problems.

Ms. Jackson’s proposal—to reduce the permitted level of smog in the air from the current 75 parts per billion to between 60 parts per billion and 70 parts per billion—is sensible, no matter what industry’s defenders may claim. It had been recommended by the agency’s independent scientific panel but rejected by the Bush administration, which proposed a weaker standard.

Industry will have to make investments in cleaner power plants, and new technologies may be required. As it is, about half the counties that monitor ozone levels are not yet in compliance with current standards, let alone the proposed standard.

Fears about burdening industry raised by critics like George Voinovich, a Republican of Ohio, and Mary Landrieu, a Democrat of Louisiana, cannot be dismissed out of hand, especially in the middle of a recession (萧条). But the health benefits, E.P.A. says, far outweigh the costs, and the time frame for compliance (服从) is generous.

1.Why are some people strongly against a stricter limitation of smog-caused pollutants?

A.Because they have to live a poorer life.

B.Because they think they have to spend more money.

C.Because they hold different political view.

D.Because they want to make more money.

2. What does Ms Jackson propose to do?

A.To reduce the permitted smog level as much as possible.

B.To raise the permitted smog level as much as possible.

C.To keep the permitted smog level from 60 to 70 to 75 parts per billion.

D.To lower the permitted smog level from 75 to 60 to 70 parts per billion.

3.What is the attitude of the author to the smog-controlling issue?

A.Objective.         B.Subjective.         C.Critical.           D.Unknown.

4.Which of the following can serve as the best title of the whole passage?

A.Cleaner power plant on the way.

B.Say no to smog pollutants.

C.Lower smog pollutant, better our life.

D.Debate on smog pollutants.

 

Never argue with one's own understanding.

The whisper of intelligence is always there, whatever you do.

If you create a time lag (隔绝层) between the whisper of intelligence and understanding in you and your action, then you are preventing the brain from growing into a new size. When you argue with intelligence, when you postpone acting according to understanding then there is confusion, the brain gets confused.

The voice of understanding, the voice of intelligence has insecurity about it. How do you know that it is the right thing?

So we tend to ignore it. Instead we accept authority. We obey.

But the brain cannot be orderly, competent, accurate and precise if you do not listen to it, if you have no respect. We are so busy with the outside world and its force that the world that is inside us does not command that respect and reverence (敬重), that care and concern from us.

So one has to be a disciple (信徒) of one's own understanding, and look upon that understanding as the master.

Sometimes one may commit a mistake, it might be the whim (念头) of the ego and we might mistake the whim, the wish of the ego for the voice of silence and intelligence, but that we have to discover. Unless you commit mistakes, how do you learn to discriminate between the false and the true? In learning there is bound to be a little insecurity, a possibility of committing mistakes. Why should one be terribly afraid of committing mistakes?

So instead of accepting the authority of habits and conditionings, while one is moving one watches, and when there is a suggestion, do not neglect, ignore, or insult the whisper from within and from one's own intelligence.

1.What will happen if you refuse to follow your own understanding according to the above passage?

A.Your brain will become smaller.

B.You will never get help from authority.

C.You will hardly know the world.

D.Your own intelligence will stop growing.

2.What is the function of committing mistakes from the view of the author?

A.Mistakes can make one practical.

B.Mistakes can make one know the facts.

C.Mistakes can allow one more time to develop.

D.Mistakes can improve one’s judgment.

3. The whole passage is developed by ______.

A.facts and ideas                         B.reasoning and explaining

C.scientific experiments                    D.arguing and debating

4.The best title of the passage might be ______.

A.Never argue with your own understanding

B.Never believe any authority while arguing

C.Never neglect whispers from around you

D.Never stop training yourself.

 

 0  57140  57148  57154  57158  57164  57166  57170  57176  57178  57184  57190  57194  57196  57200  57206  57208  57214  57218  57220  57224  57226  57230  57232  57234  57235  57236  57238  57239  57240  57242  57244  57248  57250  57254  57256  57260  57266  57268  57274  57278  57280  57284  57290  57296  57298  57304  57308  57310  57316  57320  57326  57334  151629 

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网