Guangzhou Evergrande has raised China's hunger for soccer glory ever since the year 2013 a series of its victories over other teams in and abroad China. A. sawB. bidC. had seenD. had bid 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

题目内容

Guangzhou Evergrande has raised China's hunger for soccer glory ever since the year 2013 ______ a series of its victories over other teams in and abroad China.

A. sawB. bidC. had seenD. had bid

【解析】

试题分析：句意：自从2013年见证了广州恒大对战胜国内外其他队伍的一系列胜利后，它引起了中国人对足球辉煌的渴望。Since引导时间状语从句的时候，从句中的谓语动词用一般过去式，所以选A。

考点：考查时态

练习册系列答案

英语mini课堂系列答案

考场百分百系列答案

全国68所名牌小学毕业升学真卷精编系列答案

相关题目

－Jeffery seems to go without proper food and sleep for days.

－Leave him alone.That's________he reacts to a lost love.

A．what B．how

C．why D．when

— Tom, could you give me a hand in the following exam?

— ______. Mom won’t allow me to do such crazy things.

A. No problem B. It's a pleasure C. Forget it D. My pleasure

Recently, an almost literal case of lifeboat ethics(伦理) occurred. On Aug. 4, Graham and Sheryl Anley, while boating off the coast of South Africa, hit a rock. As the boat threatened to sink the husband got off, but his wife was trapped in the boat. Instead of freeing his wife and getting her to shore, Graham grabbed Rosie, their pet dog. With Rosie safe and sound, Graham returned for Sheryl. All are doing fine.

It's a great story, but it doesn't strike me as especially newsworthy. News is supposed to be about something fairly unique, and recent research suggests that, in the right circumstances, lots of people also would have grabbed their Rosie first.

We have strange relationships with our pets. We lavish our pets with adoration and better health care than billions of people receive. We speak to pets with the same high-pitched voices that we use for babies. As an extreme example of our feelings about pets, the Nazis had strict laws that guaranteed the humane treatment of the pets of Jews being shipped to death camps.

A recent paper by George Regents University demonstrates this human involvement with pets to an astonishing extent. Participants in the study were told a situation in which a bus is out of control, bearing down on a dog and a human. Which do you save? With responses from more than 500 people, the answer was that it depended: What kind of human and what kind of dog?

Everyone would save a brother, grandparent or close friend rather than a strange dog. But when people considered their own dog versus people less connected with them—a distant cousin or a hometown stranger—votes in favor of saving the dog came rolling in. And an astonishing 40% of respondents, including 46% of women, voted to save their dog over a foreign tourist.

What does a finding like this mean? First, that your odds aren't so good if you find yourself in another country with a bus bearing down on you and a cute dog. But it also points to something deeper: our unprecedented(史无前例的) attitude toward animals, which got its start with the birth of humane societies in the 19th century.

We prison people who abuse animals, put ourselves in harm's way in boats between whales and whalers and show sympathy to Bambi and his mother. We can extend empathy to an animal and feel its pain like no other species. But let's not be too proud of ourselves. As this study and too much of our history show, we're pretty selective about how we extend our humaneness to other human beings.

1.What is the function of the first paragraph?

A. To create a relaxing mood for readers.

B. To present the theme of this essay straightly.

C. To lead in the main topic of this essay.

D. To raise problems that will be solved later.

2.The author mentions Nazi laws in the third paragraph _______________.

A. to show how cruel the Nazis were to the Jews

B. as an example to persuade people not to love pets

C. to illustrate the strange relationship between human and pets

D. as an example to display the humaneness of the Nazis

3.Which of the following is true according to the article?

A. The story of the Anleys and their dog was too unique to be newsworthy.

B. Most people surveyed choose to save their own dog rather than a human.

C. It was in the 19th century that human beings started to love their pets.

D. Human beings are more and more concerned with animals nowadays.

4.What does the author mainly argue for?

A. Pets are of great significance to us human beings.

B. We should rethink about our attitude towards animals and mankind.

C. It is kind of human beings to extend humaneness to animals.

D. We should be selective when showing attitude toward other human beings.

— Don’t be too ______ with what you wear as a middle school student.

— Come on, Mom, stop being _____ on me all the time.

A. controversial, strictB. particular, hardC. considerate; keen D. flexible; offensive

—Why are you crying? Today is your birthday!

—____________. I am so excited with so many friends surrounding me.

A. Just can’t help itB. Don’t mention it

C. None of your businessD. That’s all right

I prefer Lynne Truss’s phraseology: I am a grammar “sticker”. And, like Truss – author of Eats, shoots & Leaves – I have a “zero tolerance” approach to grammar mistakes that make people look stupid.

Now, Truss and I disagree on what it means to have “zero tolerance”. She thinks that people who mix up basic grammar “deserve to be struck by lightning, hacked (砍) up on the spot and buried in an unmarked grave”, while I just think they deserve to be passed over for a job – even if they are otherwise qualified for the position.

Everyone who applies for a position at either of my companies, iFixit or Dozuki, takes a compulsory grammar test. If job hopefuls can’t distinguish between “to” and “too”, their applications go into the bin.

Of course, we write for a living. iFixit.com is the world’s largest online repair manual (指南), and Dozuki helps companies write their own technical documentation, like paperless work instructions and step-by-step user manuals. So, it makes sense that we’ve made a strong strike against grammar errors.

But grammar is relevant for all companies. Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the Internet. And, for better or worse, people judge you if you can’t tell the difference between “their” “there” and “they’re”.

Good grammar makes good business sense – and not just when it comes to hiring writers. Writing isn’t in the official job description of most people in our office. Still, we give our grammar test to everybody, including our salespeople, our operations staff, and our programmers.

Grammar signifies more than just a person’s ability to remember high school English. I’ve found that people who make fewer mistakes on a grammar test also make fewer mistakes when they are doing something completely unrelated to writing – like stocking shelves or labeling parts. It is the same with programmers. Applicants who don’t think writing is important are likely to think lots of other things also aren’t important.

1.The author agrees with Lynne Truss in that ________.

A. grammar mistakes can’t be tolerated

B. books on grammar make people stupid

C. people need to learn basic grammar

D. grammar mistakes are absolutely unavoidable

2.What’s the author’s “zero tolerance” approach to these job seekers who mix up basic grammar?

A. They should be left out for a job.

B. They have to correct their mistakes.

C. They aren’t qualified for their jobs.

D. They must be severely punished.

3.Which of the following is TRUE of iFixit and Dozuki?

A. Only one of them has a compulsory grammar test.

B. They are companies where one learns grammar.

C. Grammar is quite important for their existence.

D. They depend on grammar correction for a living.

4.What can we learn from the text?

A. Companies giving grammar tests may have no good business sense.

B. Grammar becomes unimportant as language is constantly changing.

C. A “zero tolerance” approach to grammar errors might seem a little unfair.

D. People who pay attention to writing may pay attention to other things.

A couple of years ago, before a trip to China, Nicole Davis and her US women’s volleyball teammates were warned about the prominence (显著、突出) of coach “Jenny” Lang Ping in her native country.

“I was pushed over by Chinese journalists while I was just trying to put my luggage on the bus,” said Davis.

Known as the “Iron Hammer” for her punishing spikes(扣球),Lang made it possible for China to dominate in the sport in the early 1980s. She was a key player on China’s 1984 Olympic gold medal winning team.

When the US team arrived for the Olympics, Lang, 48, who is from Beijing, had to take a different route to avoid a crowd of reporters and fans.

Then came the greatest moment to Lang：While the US team was playing in a packed gym, at least 8,000 Chinese fans unfurled an American flag.

“That really says it all,” Davis said. “They look at her as an icon(偶像)．I’m sure it’s hard for them to see her coaching another country, but they love her so 七彩教育网ly that her success is their success.”

The loyalty of the Chinese fans was tested on Friday, when China lost a match to the US.

“It’s a pity that China lost the match, but I’m still glad that Lang Ping’s team won, since she is the pride of China’s volleyball,” said Liu Chengli, a spectator. “We also cheered for

Lang’s victory.”

Lang said she just tried to stay professional when the two teams meet. “It doesn’t matter if we play China or any other team. It’s the same.” Lang said.

Davis said she and her teammates could not have imagined the passion for volleyball among Chinese because the sport was lack of popularity in the US. The reception from Chinese fans has touched the US players, said US volleyball player Lindsey Berg.

“It’s such an honor to be here and play for our coach here in China,” she said. “The amount of support that the Chinese give to her and us has been tremendous. The whole event has been unbelievable.”

1. What’s the passage mainly about?

A．Staying professional.B．Cheering for the Iron Hammer.

C．A match between China and the US.D．Lang Ping’s career as a coach.

2. Lang Ping avoided meeting the reporters and fans probably because she ________.

A．was afraid to be questioned about her strategy

B．didn’t want to be paid much attention to

C．disliked to be with her fans

D．didn’t want to disturb public order

3. What does the underlined word “unfurled” exactly mean?

A．destroyed completelyB．tore into pieces

C．spread out to the windD．rolled up

4. What does Lang Ping mean by saying “It doesn’t matter if we play China or any other team.”？

A．American Volleyball Team will beat any team.

B．Chinese Volleyball Team is the same as other teams.

C．She just tried to stay professional.

D．The results of each match will be the same.

5. What impressed the US team players most?

A．The tolerance of Chinese people.

B．The popularity of volleyball in China.

C．Lang Ping’s coaching skills.

D．The loyalty for volleyball of the Chinese.

From the health point of view we are living in a marvelous age. We are immunized from birth against many of the most dangerous diseases. A large number of once fatal illnesses can now be cured by modern drugs and surgery. It is almost certain that one day remedies will be found for the most stubborn remaining diseases. The expectation of life has increased enormously. But though the possibility of living a long and happy life is greater than ever before, every day we witness the incredible slaughter of men, women and children on the roads. Man versus the motor-car ! It is a never-ending battle which man is losing. Thousands of people the world over are killed or horribly killed each year and we are quietly sitting back and letting it happen.

It has been rightly said that when a man is sitting behind a steering wheel, his car becomes the extension of his personality. There is no doubt that the motor-car often brings out a man’s very worst qualities. People who are normally quiet and pleasant may become unrecognizable when they are behind a steering-wheel. They swear, they are ill-mannered and aggressive, willful as two-years-olds and utterly selfish. All their hidden frustrations, disappointments and jealousies seem to be brought to the surface by the act of driving.

The surprising thing is that society smiles so benignly on the motorist and seems to condone his behaviour. Everything is done for his convenience. Cities are allowed to become almost uninhabitable because of heavy tragic; towns are made ugly by huge car parks; the countryside is desecrated by road networks; and the mass annual slaughter becomes nothing more than a statistic, to be conveniently forgotten.

It is high time a world code were created to reduce this senseless waste of human life. With regard to driving, the laws of some countries are notoriously lax and even the strictest are not strict enough. A code which was universally accepted could only have a dramatically beneficial effect on the accident rate. Here are a few examples of some the things that might be done. The driving test should be standardized and made far more difficult than it is; all the drivers should be made to take a test every three years or so; the age at which young people are allowed to drive any vehicle should be raised to at least 21; all vehicles should be put through stringent annual tests for safety. Even the smallest amount of alcohol in the blood can impair a person’s driving ability. Present drinking and driving laws (where they exist) should be mad much stricter. Maximum and minimum speed limits should be imposed on all roads. Governments should lay down safety specifications for manufacturers, as has been done in the USA. All advertising stressing power and performance should be banned. These measures may sound inordinately harsh. But surely nothing should be considered as to severe if tit results in reducing the annual toll of human life. After all, the world is for human beings, not motor-cars.

1.The main idea of this passage is

[A] Traffic accidents are mainly caused by motorists.

Thousands of people the world over are killed each year.

[C] The laws of some countries about driving are too lax.

[D] Only stricter traffic laws can prevent accidents.

2.What does the author think of society toward motorists?

[A] Society smiles on the motorists.

Huge car parks are built in the cities and towns.

[C] Victims of accidents are nothing.

[D] Society condones their rude driving.

3.Why does the author say:’ his car becomes the extension of his personality?’

[A] Driving can show his real self.

Driving can show the other part of his personality.

[C] Driving can bring out his character.

[D] His car embodies his temper.

4..Which of the followings is NOT mentioned as a way against traffic accidents?

[A] Build more highways.

Stricter driving tests.

[C] Test drivers every three years.

[D] raise age limit and lay down safety specifications.

5..The attitude of the author is

[A] ironical

critical

[C] appealing

[D] militant

Vocabulary

1.immunise 使免疫，使免除

2.expectation of life = life expectancy 平均寿命

3.versus = against 对顶，反对

4.mutilate 伤害

5.wilful 任性的，固执的

6.benign 宽厚的，仁慈的

7.condone 宽容

8.desecrate 亵渎，玷污

9.code 法规，规定，惯例

10.stringent 严格的，紧急的，迫切的

11.performance 演出，成品，这里是指

car’ s behavior such as speed,

function etc.可译成行为，

汽车行为、功能等。

试题分类