题目内容

【题目】下面文章中共有10处语言错误,每句中最多有两处。错误仅涉及一个单词的增加,删除或修改。

增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(),并在其下面写出该加的词

删除:把多余的词用()划掉。

修改:在错的词下画一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。

注意:1.每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;

2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。

My father took me out camping for the first time when I was seven. He wanted teach me about animals, insects and trees. My uncles all come along with bows and arrows for hunting.

One evening at sunset, we sat by the fire, having our barbecue. Just then a bird was flying over us. My uncles immediate jumped up and shot their arrows on the bird. Neither of the arrows hit the target. Suddenly the arrows was flying down at us from the sky — they were looked like rain! We ran to escape but fortunately no one was injured.

That day I didn’t learn many about animals, insects or trees, but I learnt a impressive lesson about gravity!

【答案】1. wanted后加to

2. comecame

3. immediateimmediately

4. onat

5. NeitherNone

6. waswere

7. 删除were或者looked

8. butand

9. manymuch

10. a an

【解析】

这是一篇记叙文。短文叙述了作者和父亲、叔叔一起去野营。爸爸想教作者关于动物、昆虫和树木的知识。一只鸟从他的们头顶飞过。作者的叔叔立即向那只鸟射箭。箭都没有射中目标,反而从空中落回了地面,很幸运没有人受伤,那天作者没有学到很多关于动物、昆虫或树木的知识,但是学到了关于重力的知识。

第一处:考查动词不定式。want to do sth“想要做某事”。故wanted后加to

第二处:考查时态。整篇短文都为一般过去时。所以本句也为一般过去时。故将come改成came

第三处:考查副词。jumped up为动词短语,所以应该用副词immediately来修饰。故immediate将改成immediately

第四处:考查介词。shoot sth at“射击......瞄准……”故将on改成at

第五处:考查代词。根据“their arrows ”可知,射出的是三者或者三者以上的箭,都没有射中,none代表后边的东西必须是三者或三者以上。而neither表示两者都不。故Neither将改成None

第六处:考查主谓一致。主语为 the arrows,所以be动词为were。故将was改成were

第七处:考查动词。look为半系动词,无被动形式,所以删除were。或者删除looked,构成系表结构“be like”。再根据句意“它们看起来像雨/它们像雨”。故删除were或者looked

第八处:考查连词。根据句意“我们跑开了,幸运的是没有人受伤。”所以前后句意为承接关系。故将but改成and

第九处:考查muchmuch修饰不可数名词, much后省略了knowledge。故将many改成much

第十处:考查冠词。impressive首字母的发音为元音音素,所以不定冠词为an。故将a改成 an

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】Directions: Complete the following paragraphs by using the words in the box. Each word can only be used once.

Note that there is one word more than you need.

A Bad Idea

Think you can walk, dive, take phone calls, e-mail and listen to music at the same time? Well, New York's new law says you can't. And you'll be 1 $S100 if you do it on a New York City street.

The law went into force last month, following research and a(n) 2number of accidents that involved people using electronic gadgets when crossing the street.

Who's to3 ? Scientists say that our multitasking abilities are limited.

"We are under the impression that our brain can do more than it often can," says Rene Marois, a neuroscientist in Tennessee. “But a major limitation is the inability to4on two things at once".

The young people are often considered the great multitaskers. However, an Oxford University research suggests this idea is open to question. A group of 18-to 21-year-olds and a group of 35-to 39-year-olds were given 90 seconds to translate5into numbers, using a simple code. The younger group did 10 percent better when not interrupted. But when both groups were interrupted by a phone call or a(n) 6message, the older group matched the younger group in speed and 7.

It is difficult to measure the productivity8by multitaskers. But it is probably a lot. Jonathan Spire, chief analyst at Basex. a business-research firm, estimates the cost of interruptions to the American economy at nearly $650 billion a year.

The9is based on surveys with office workers. The surveys conclude that 28 percent of the workers' time was spent on interruptions and10time before they returned to their main tasks.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网