题目内容
It was Christmas Day 1999.On CNN, talk show host Larry King was interviewing Stephen Hawking.
“What, professor, puzzled you the most?” King asked. “What do you thing about the most?”
Hawking immediately replied, “Women.”
It’s a comfort that Hawking, one of the smartest men in the world, is puzzled by the opposite sex.But, that’s not surprising, according to Satoshi Kanazawa.Bright people are no better than anyone else at making smart decisions about common things, he says.These include finding a mate, maintaining family relationships, raising children, finding the way home, and handling a variety of basic life needs.
That’s because there are several kinds of formal “intelligence”, Kanazawa argues.Being smart one way does not necessary mean smart in another way.This view is sure to cause arguments among scientists who think about thinking.That is because it disagrees with the common view that general intelligence is a single thing.In that view, it is not, as Kanazawa and others say, set of independent mental areas.
Kanazawa says that some kinds of intelligence developed slowly over time.Many people have heard about what is called “emotional intelligence”.Now, psychologists have discovered several other types of intelligence.These include the ability to learn a language, find a mate, recognize faces, and locate oneself in a new environment.
But, is there evidence to support the theory that intelligence comes in many forms? “Actually, there is quite a lot of evidence”, Kanazawa says.“If there were only one type of intelligence”, he adds, “Then people with high IQs should be ‘smart’ in every way.”
In one test, a psychologist took a group of subjects on a bike, walking into the forest.He then told them to find their way back.The high IQ people were no more likely to be able to find out where they were.In another experiment, a researcher asked people to find their way to a specific location in a computer maze(迷宫).Once again, high IQ did not give them any edge.
1.Which of the following state is true according to the text?
A.It’s surprising that the opposite sex puzzles Hawking.
B.It’s natural that the opposite sex puzzles Hawking.
C.People with high IQ have more advantages in daily life.
D.People with high IQ have more emotional intelligence.
2.What are smart people according to Satoshi Kanazawa?
A.They are better than the other people at making smart decisions about common things.
B.They are as bad as the other people at making smart decisions about common things.
C.They are more likely to be able to find the way back than the other people.
D.They are more likely to be able to find a friend of the opposite sex.
3.The underlined word “edge” in this passage probably means .
A.corner B.intelligence C.advantage D.proof
4.What does the writer mainly tell us in this passage?
A.Anyone who has high IQ is always smart in doing everything.
B.Anyone who has high IQ has higher emotional intelligence.
C.Those who have high IQ do better than those who don’t in everything.
D.Those who have high IQ can’t do better than those who don’t in something.
5.What does the last paragraph play in the text?
A.Drawing a conclusion. B.Supporting the theme with facts.
C.Stating the fact. D.Expounding the theme.
BBCDB
Three high students become heroes after their act of saving a baby’s life.
Andrew Willis, 15, his brother Chris, 13, and friend Reece Galea, 14, were walking along Swallow Drive on their way to school on May 23, when Nicholle Price ran out of her house, shouting for help. Her six-month-old son Corey had swallowed (吞下) an earring (耳环) and the young mother couldn’t ring for help because something was wrong with her phone. The three teenagers rushed to the aid of Ms Price, called an ambulance (救护车), calmed her down and waited with her until the ambulance arrived before heading to school.
Ms Price, Corey and his grandmother Joyce Finnie visited the school last Thursday to thank the boys for their kind action. “It’s good to know that there are still some good people who will stop and help,” Ms Price said. “While I was shouting for help, a woman walking her dog went straight past, without stopping. I don’t know what would have happened if these boys had not stopped.”
The teenagers were shocked at the attention they received at school for their heroic act but admitted that the incident was nerve-racking(刺激神经的). “We heard her shouting so we knew something wasn’t right,” Andrew said. “We thought someone had died. It was scary (惊慌的) but we just did what we had to do.”
Just as proud as the boys’ parents is their principal, Tim McCallum.
After two days in hospital, Corey has now fully recovered. “He’s got two new teeth to show,” Ms Price said. “I have to keep a closer eye on him. He’s into everything now and grabs whatever he finds to put it straight into his mouth.”
【小题1】The three high students were _____ when a woman ran out of her house shouting for help.
A.playing near the house |
B.on their way to school |
C.walking their dogs nearby |
D.on their way back from school |
A.how dangerous the case was |
B.how brave the three boys were |
C.why the three teenagers’ action was heroic |
D.how clever the three boys were |
A.they didn’t expect they would be given so much praise |
B.they felt excited to have become so famous after the incident |
C.they were supposed to receive so many prizes for their good deed |
D.they were proud of the attention they received at school for their heroic deed |
A.How a baby was saved after swallowing an earring |
B.Why the mother shouted for help |
C.Baby life saved: teenage heroes earn high praise |
D.A mother came to school to thank 3 teenagers |
“People should have one meat-free day a week if they want to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help deal with climate change,” the world’s leading authority on global warming has told The Observer.
Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said that people should then go on to reduce their meat consumption even further.
Pachauri, who was re-elected the panel’s chairman for a second six-year term last week, said diet change was important because of the huge greenhouse gas emissions (排放) and other environmental problems associated with raising cattle and other animals. “It was relatively easy to change eating habits compared to changing means of transport,” he said.
The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation has estimated that meat production accounts for nearly a fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions. These are produced during the production. For example, ruminants (反刍动物), particularly cows, give off a gas called methane, which is 23 times more effective as a global warming agent than CO2.
Pachauri can expect some opposite responses from the food industry to his advice, though last night he was given unexpected support by Masterchef presenter and restaurateur John Torode. “I have a little bit and enjoy it,” said Torode. “Too much for any person is bad. But there’s a bigger issue here: where the meat comes from. If we all bought British and stopped buying imported food, we’d save a huge amount of carbon emissions.”
Professor Robert Watson, the chief scientific adviser for the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, said government could help educate people about the benefits of eating less meat, but it should not regulate. “Eating less meat would help, there’s no question about that,” Watson said.
However, Chris Lamb, head of marketing for pig industry group BPEX, said the meat industry had been unfairly targeted and was working hard to find out which activities had the biggest environmental impact and reduce them. “Some ideas were contradictory,” he said. “For example, one solution to emissions from cattle and other animals was to keep them indoors, but this would damage animal welfare. Climate change is a very young science and our view is there are a lot of simple solutions being proposed.”
1.What is directly related to global warming?
A.Consumption of meat. |
B.Growth of cattle. |
C.Methane from ruminants. |
D.Processing of meat. |
2.Who holds a view opposite to the others’ in the passage?
A.Rajendra Pachauri. |
B.John Torode. |
C.Robert Watson. |
D.Chris Lamb. |
3.It is implied in the passage that _____.
A.we should try to keep away from cattle |
B.ruminants should not be left outdoors |
C.the meat industry will soon close down |
D.we must do our duty to save the earth |
4. Which of the following might be the best title for the passage?
A.Less meat, slower global warming |
B.More animals, more greenhouse gas |
C.Less imported food, better our environment |
D.Greater diet change, smaller climate change |