ÌâÄ¿ÄÚÈÝ

¼ÙÉèÄãÊÇij¹ú¼ÊѧУѧÉú»áµÄÖ÷ϯÀ¡£ÄãУѧÉú»á´òËã×éÖ¯Ò»´ÎÓлúÊ߲˲ÉÕª»î¶¯¡£ÇëÄãÓÃÓ¢Óïдһ·Ý֪ͨ¡£ÄÚÈÝ°üÀ¨£º

1. »î¶¯Ä¿µÄ£ºÁ˽âÓлúÊ߲˵ÄÖÖÖ²£»ÌåÑé²ÉÕªÀÖȤ£»

2. »î¶¯Ê±¼ä¼°µØµã£º±¾ÖÜÈÕÉÏÎ磬Î÷ÐÇÅ©³¡£»

3.»î¶¯ÄÚÈÝ£ºµ¼ÓδøÁì²Î¹ÛÅ©³¡£»²ÉÕªÊß²Ë(»Æ¹Ï£¬Î÷ºìÊÁ£¬ÇÑ×ÓµÈ)£»ÔÚÅ©³¡ÌṩµÄ³ø·¿Ç××ÔÅëâ¿×Ô¼ºÕªµ½µÄÊ߲ˡ£

×¢Ò⣺ 1. ´ÊÊý100×óÓÒ£»

2. ¿ÉÒÔÊʵ±Ôö¼Óϸ½Ú£¬ÒÔʹÐÐÎÄÁ¬¹á¡£

²Î¿¼´Ê»ã£º²ÉÕª£ºpick ÓлúÅ©Òµ£ºorganic farming

Notice

____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

Students¡¯ Union

Á·Ï°²áϵÁдð°¸
Ïà¹ØÌâÄ¿

Most academics would view a post at an elite university like Oxford or Harvard as the crowning achievement of a career¡ªbringing both honour and access to better wine cellars. But scholars desire such places for reasons beyond glory. They believe perching on one of the topmost branches of the academic tree will also improve the quality of their work, by bringing them together with other geniuses with whom they can collaborate and who may help spark new ideas. This sounds reasonable. Unfortunately£¬as Albert Laszlo Barabasi of Northeastern University£¬in Boston (and also, it must be said, of Harvard), shows in a study published in Scientific Reports, it is not true.

Dr Barabasi and his team examined the careers of physicists who began publishing between 1950 and 1980 and continued to do so for at least 20 years. They ranked the impact of the institutions these people attended by counting the number of citations each institution¡¯s papers received within five years of publication. By tracking the association of individual physicists and counting their citations in a similar way, Dr Barabasi was able to work out whether moving from a low to a high-ranking university improved a physicist¡¯s impact. In total, he and his team analysed 2,725 careers.

They found that, though an average physicist moved once or twice during his career, moving from a low-rank university to an elite one did not increase his scientific impact. Going in the opposite direction, however, did have a small negative influence. The consequence is that elite university do not£¬at least as far as physicists are concerned£¬add value to output. That surprising conclusion is one which the authorities in countries such as Britain, who are seeking to concentrate expensive subjects such as physics in fewer, more elite institutions¡ªpartly to save money, but also to create what are seen as centers of excellence¡ªmight wish to consider.

1. What is the fundamental reason why scholars want to get a post at an elite university?

A. Their academic career can benefit from it.

B. It is an access to better wine cellars.

C. Reasons beside glory.

D. They can win honour.

2. On what basis did Dr Barabasi¡¯s research team draw conclusions that getting a post at a higher-rank university won¡¯t help scholastic impact?

A. His team examined the 20-year careers of physicists.

B. He came from Havard, a top-ranking university himself and knew it well.

C. Individual physicists¡¯ citations by other authors increased within 5 years.

D. They ranked the physicists¡¯ institutions according to citations to these universities¡¯ paper.

3. Which of the following is true of Dr Barabasi¡¯s research?

A. It proved that a post at an elite university helps academics.

B. It began in 1950 and ended in 1980.

C. It calculated the citations of the physicists¡¯ institutions.

D. It is based on a lot more than 2,000 scholars of various fields.

Among various programmes, TV talk shows have covered every inch of space on daytime television. And anyone who watches them regularly knows that each one is different in style. But no two shows are more opposite in content, while at the same time standing out above the rest, than the Jerry Springer and the Oprah Winfrey shows.

Jerry Springer could easily be considered the king of rubbish talk. The contents on his show are as surprising as can be. For example, the show takes the ever-common talk show titles of love, sex, cheating, and hate, to a different level. Clearly, the Jerry Springer show is about the dark side of society, yet people are willing to eat up the troubles of other people's lives.

Like Jerry Springer, Oprah Winfrey takes TV talk show to its top, but Oprah goes in the opposite direction. The show is mainly about the improvement of society and different quality of life. Contents are from teaching your children lessons, managing your work week, to getting to know your neighbors.

Compared to Oprah, the Jerry Springer show looks like poisonous waste being poured into society. Jerry ends every show with a "final word". He makes a small speech about the entire idea of the show. Hopefully, this is the part where most people will learn something very valuable.

Clean as it is, the Oprah show is not for everyone. The show's main viewers are middleclass Americans. Most of these people have the time, money, and ability to deal with life's tougher problems. Jerry Springer, on the other hand, has more of a connection with the young adults of society. These are 18-to-21-year-olds whose main troubles in life include love, relationship, sex, money and drug. They are the ones who see some value and lessons to be learned through the show's exploitation.

1.Compared with other TV talk shows, both the Jerry Springer and the Oprah Winfrey are ________.

A. more interestingB. unusually popular

C. more detailedD. more formal

2.Though the social problems Jerry Springer talks about appear unpleasant, people who watch the shows ________.

A. remain interested in them

B. are ready to face up to them

C. remain cold to them

D. are willing to get away from them

3.Which of the following is likely to be a topic of the Oprah Winfrey show?

A. A new type of robot.

B. Nation hatred.

C. Family income planning.

D. Street accident.

4.We can learn from the passage that the two talk shows ________.

A. have become the only ones of its kind

B. exploit the weaknesses in human nature

C. appear at different times of the day

D. attract different people

¸ù¾Ý¶ÌÎÄÄÚÈÝ£¬´Ó¶ÌÎĺóµÄÑ¡ÏîÖÐÑ¡³öÄÜÌîÈë¿Õ°×´¦µÄ×î¼ÑÑ¡ÏѡÏîÖÐÓÐÁ½ÏîΪ¶àÓàÑ¡Ïî¡£

Third-Culture Kids

Did you grow up in one culture, your parents came from another, and you are now living in a totally different country? If so, then you are a third-culture kid!

The term ¡°third-culture kid¡± (or TCK) was coined in the 1960s by Dr. Ruth. She first came across this phenomenon when she researched North American children living in India. Caught between two cultures, they form their very own. 1.About 90 percent of them have a university degree, while 40 percent pursue a postgraduate or doctor degree. They usually benefit from their intercultural experience, which helps them to grow into successful academics and professionals.

2. In fact many hardships may arise from this phenomenon. A third-culture kid may not be able to adapt themselves completely to their new surroundings as expected. Instead, they may always remain an outsider in different host cultures. Max, for example, experienced this fundamental feeling of strangeness throughout his life as a third-culture kid. 3. While this can be a way to create a network of friends all around the world, it can be difficult for a third-culture kid like Max to maintain close friendships and relationships.

For a third-culture kid, it is often easier to move to a new foreign country than to return to their ¡°home¡± country. After living in Australia and South Korea for many years, Louis finally returned to Turkey as a teenager. But she felt out of place when she returned to the country where she was born.

4. She did not share the same values as her friends¡¯ even years after going back home. While a third-culture kid must let go of their identity as foreigner when he/she returns, the home country can prove to be more foreign than anything he/she came across before. The peer group they face does not match the idealized image children have of ¡°home¡±. 5.

As a part of the growing ¡°culture¡±, TCKs may find it a great challenge for them to feel at home in many places.

A. Yet being a third-culture kid is not always easy.

B. In general, they often reach excellent academic results.

C. This often makes it hard for them to form their own identity.

D. However, their parents can help them see the opportunities of a mobile lifestyle.

E. Their experience abroad helps them to gain a better understanding of cultural differences.

F. Unlike other teens of her age, she didn¡¯t know anything about current TV shows or fashion trends.

G. Additionally, making new friends and saying goodbye to old ones will at some point become routine for a third-culture kid.

It¡¯s true to say that technology makes our lives easier. However, increasingly scientists are saying that we need to give ourselves a break-----otherwise we put ourselves at risk(·çÏÕ) of developing hundreds of health problems. Over the summer the days are longer and sunnier. Why not put this free time to good use and do something away from technology?

You could learn a new skill. There are hundreds of possibilities: cooking, a musical instrument or a new sport. Haven¡¯t you always wanted to learn how to knit(±àÖ¯)? You could use your free time to practice these new things, which might lead to an exciting opportunity in the future.

If you just want to relax, why not head to a beach? Take along your favorite book and relax on the sand, or go for a walk along the coastline. If you don¡¯t live near a beach, you could go to your local park. Why not have a picnic, or try to explore some of the local wildlife? You could even get involved in the latest craze(¿ñÈÈ): adult coloring books! Coloring is a surprising thing to help you relax, and it can be a nice way to escape from the stress of modern life!

Whatever you choose to do, try something new! You might surprise yourself and find a hidden gift within you; you might make new friends along the way. Next time you find yourself changing TV channels(ƵµÀ) from one to another without a clear purpose, think about what else you could spend your time doing.

1.According to the text, technology_______.

A. makes our life harder

B. may bring us illness

C. keep us busy

D. gives us a break from work

2.In the author¡¯s opinion, one of the best ways to relax is probably_______.

A. doing net shopping

B. watching TV at home

C. reading books on a beach

D. learning a new skill

3.Which of the following might be the best title of the text?

A. Spending your free time away from technology.

B. The disadvantages of Watching TV.

C. The relationship between technology and health.

D. Finding the hidden gift in you.

Thousands of people began pouring into Pennsylvania from other states. They wanted to buy lottery tickets(²ÊƱ). The tickets cost only $ 0.9 each. But that small spending could bring them a reward of $ 90 million .That was the second largest lottery jackpot £¨»ýÀÛ½±½ð£©in history.

More than 87 million tickets were bough t for the Pennsylvania lottery drawing. Those who bought tickets had to choose seven numbers from 1 to 80£®The chance of winning was one in 9.6 million, but that little chance certainly didn¡¯t affect ticket sales. In the last few days before the drawing, tickets were sold at the unbelievable rate of 500 per second.

Experts say many people buy lottery tickets because they just want to have a piece of the action. Others say the lottery is a stock market for poor people. It allows them to dream about wealth they¡¯ll probably never have.

But many people believe lotteries are no better than legalized gambling. Some critics note that most people who play are poor and may not be able to afford the tickets. There are also many addicts who take the game seriously. They may pour their life savings into lottery tickets. Some clubs have been formed to help them kick the habit.

Politicians like lotteries because they provide money that would otherwise have to come from new taxes. The profits from lotteries are usually used to pay for education or programs for senior citizens. But critics say this arrangement just allows states to legalize vice, under the name of social progress. Whether you regard stock lotteries right or not, you cannot refuse to accept their extreme popularity with many Americans.

1.Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?

A£®Buying lotteries may help people become wealthy overnight.

B. Politicians like lotteries because they don¡¯t have to pay extra taxes.

C£®The profits from lotteries are usually used for the public.

D. Some critics don¡¯t like lotteries because many poor people waste money on them.

2.In just one hour in the last few days, the Pennsylvania lottery sold tickets totaling_______.

A£®$ 16.2 million B£®$ 38.88 million

C£®$ 19.6 million D£®$ 87 million

3. The underlined word in the last paragraph refers to__________.

A. something profiyable

B. something challenging

C. something immoral

D.something easy

4. What is the main purpose of the passage?

A. To introduce the lotteries in Pennsylvania.

B. To persuade people not to buy lotteries.

C. To show the drawbacks of buying lotteries.

D. To tell us the different opinions on lotteries.

Î¥·¨ºÍ²»Á¼ÐÅÏ¢¾Ù±¨µç»°£º027-86699610 ¾Ù±¨ÓÊÏ䣺58377363@163.com

¾«Ó¢¼Ò½ÌÍø