题目内容
13.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43b81/43b81e78017e7ca76a3e8f20eea9c491441ee8a0" alt=""
The first study focused on the question of cloth bag contamination(传染).It's well-known that supermarkets offer many opportunities for people to pick up contaminated food:other shoppers contaminate shopping carts,and stockroom clerks contaminate containers.When shoppers put such things into cloth bags,they can contaminate the bag,and then wind up contaminating uncontaminated foods on their next shopping trip.Large numbers of bacteria were found in almost all bags.
Washing the bags might help,but researchers found that"reusable bags are seldom washed and often used for different purposes".
The second study should end the"use reusable grocery bags"argument.In the study,researchers evaluated(评估)the bags on a set of environmental standards,including global warming potential.The table below shows how many times that non-HDPE bags must be used in order to bring their global warming potential down to that of an HDPE bag.The first column,for example,shows that a paper bag should be reused three times to reduce its global warming potential to that of an HDPE bag,while you have to use an LDPE bag four times,a non-woven PP bag 11times,and a cotton bag up to 131times to achieve the same end.
Type of carrier | HDPE bag (No secondary reuse) | HDPE bag (40.3% reused as rubbish bags) | HDPE bag (100% reused as rubbish bags) | HDPE bag (Used three times) |
Paper bag | 3 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
LDPE bag | 4 | =5 | 9 | 12 |
Non-woven PP bag | 11 | 14 | 26 | 33 |
Cotton bag | 131 | 173 | 327 | 393 |
72.The researchers in both studies might agree thatC.
A.we should reuse our grocery bags as much as possible
B.cotton bags are environment-friendly when they are reused
C.plastic bags are good for the environment and our health
D.grocery bags,if washed,can reduce global warming potential
73.The underlined phrase"wind up"in Paragraph 2probably meansB.
A.give up B.end up C.pick up D.take up
74.What's the problem with cloth bags according to the first study?A
A.They are easily contaminated when reused.
B.They produce large numbers of bacteria.
C.They are poisonous and can pollute foods.
D.They need washing before being reused.
75.We know from the chart that in terms of reducing the global warming potential,A.
A.if an HDPE bag is used three times,a cotton bag should be used 393times
B.the more times HDPE bags are reused,the greater their global warming potential is
C.LDPE bags,when reused 9times,have a better effect than cotton bags reused 131times
D.non-woven PP bags,though reused 33times,work worse than paper bags reused 7times.
分析 文章论述了布的食品袋传染细菌,循环利用的食品袋有害环境,得出传统的薄塑料袋有利于健康和环保的结论.
解答 72-75 CBAA
72题答案是C.文章大意题.根据文章最后一句So the conclusion seems clear:the traditional,thin plastic bag has better environmental performance and is likely to be quite safer for human health.可知答案是C.
73题答案是B.推理判断题.根据When shoppers put such things into cloth bags,they can contaminate the bag,and then wind up contaminating uncontaminated foods on their next shopping trip.Large numbers of bacteria were found in almost all bags.可知wind up 表示"结束,终结",近义词是end up.故选B.
74题答案是A.细节理解题.根据The first study focused on the question of cloth bag contamination(传染).It's well-known that supermarkets offer many opportunities for people to pick up contaminated food:other shoppers contaminate shopping carts,and stockroom clerks contaminate containers.When shoppers put such things into cloth bags,they can contaminate the bag,and then wind up contaminating uncontaminated foods on their next shopping trip.Large numbers of bacteria were found in almost all bags.
可知布袋带来传染.故选A.
75题答案是A.细节理解题.根据表格最后一列可知答案是A.
点评 这是一篇健康环保类阅读.题目涉及多道细节理解题,做题时需要结合原文和题目有针对性的找出相关语句进行仔细分析,结合选项选出正确答案;考查文章大意的题需要对文章大意有清晰的理解才能得出正确答案,切记胡乱猜测,一定要做到有理有据.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33333/3333322ec6f90700417d5bbd9a91411154d4bc23" alt=""
A. | In memory of | B. | In charge of | C. | In praise of | D. | In favor of |