题目内容
【题目】某中学网站提出“走路去上学”的倡议，请你就这一话题写一篇约80词的英语短文。
内容提示：
1. 走路有利于健康安全；
2. 和同学结伴可以互相了解，相互帮助；
3. 不需要父母接送，学会自理；
4. 道路上车辆减少，城市不再拥堵；
要求：
1. 要点齐全，条理清楚，语句通顺，语法正确，书写规范。
2. 文中不得出现真实校名及姓名，否则不予评分。
3. 开头已给出，不计入总次数，开适当发挥。
参考词汇：be good for， each other， send， no longer， crowded
Walking to school is a wonderful way to exercise .
【答案】
I think going to school on foot is good for us. First of all, walking to school is a wonderful way to exercise and it's good for health. Next, it's fun to walk together with friends every day. We can talk about something interesting and know each other better. What's more, if we walk, our parents won'thave to drive us to school. There will be fewer cars in the city. More walking and less driving helps to make our city cleaner. The streets won't be as crowded as they are now. I hope more and more students will go to school on foot.
【解析】试题分析：这是一篇提纲类作文，我们需要用正确的英语把给出的要点表达出来. 动笔前，一定要认真分析要点，理解要点要表达的含义，不能遗漏要点，跑题偏题。本作文中给出的要点比较具体,故需要准确表达.写作时注意准确运用时态，上下文意思连贯，符合逻辑关系，尽量使用自己熟悉的单词句式，同时也要注意使用高级词汇和高级句型使文章显得更有档次。特别注意在选择句式时要赋予变化。平时除了加强词汇积累，写作联系以外，还可以适当记忆一些类似的范文，这样在考试中可以起到事半功倍的效果。
【亮点说明】范文中运用一些常见的短语be good for 对。。有好处；talk about 谈论； What's more而且；Next, it's fun to walk together with friends every day这个句子做形式主语，真正的主语是后面的不定式；More walking and less driving helps to make our city cleaner这个句子中运用到动名词做主语，谓语动词用第三人称单数 ；
口算心算速算应用题系列答案
同步拓展阅读系列答案【题目】Boys are not so good at English when there are girls in their class, a research student said. This finding disagrees with the widely held belief that girls always have a good influence on boys in school.
Boys do best with as few girls as possible in English lessons at primary and secondary schools, Steven Proud, a research student at Bristol University, told the Royal Economic Society’s conference.
But when it comes to math and science, both boys and girls at primary schools achieve up to a tenth of a grade higher when there is a greater percentage of girls in the class, Proud found.
Proud kept a record of boys’ and girls’ test results at the ages of 7, 11, and 16 in 16,000 schools in England. He studied the test scores to see whether the percentage of girls made a difference to the results of both boys and girls in math, science and English.
Boys always perform worse when the number of girls they study English with increases, which is especially the case at primary schools. Proud also found that girls are unaffected by the number of boys in their English class.
Proud said boys may do worse in English when there is high proportion(比例) of girls in their class because they think that the girls are better than them. It could also be that teachers use teaching styles more appropriate(适合) to girls when there are more girls than boys in the class.
Proud argues that his results show boys should be taught English in single-sex classes.
However, Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at the University of Buckingham, said, “Boys may be discouraged by how well girls are doing in English, but you can’t say that it means boys and girls should be separated. It has very little practical importance to schools.”
Theme | Boys may do _【1】__ in English in a class with a higher percentage of girls. | |
Widely held ____【2】_____ | Girls always have a good influence on boys in school. | |
Proud’s ___【3】___ | When there are more girls | both boys and girls at primary schools perform better in math and ___【5】____. |
When the number of girls _【4】____. | boys perform worse in English | |
When the number of boys changes | girls aren’t __【6】___ in an English class. | |
Possible ____【7】___. | Boys think that the girls are better than them. Teachers use ___【8】___ styles more appropriate to girls. | |
Proud’s suggestion | Boys and girls should be taught English in _【9】___ classes. | |
Alan’s opinion | Don’t ___【10】____ the boys and girls. | |