题目内容
13．Building Trust in a Relationship AgainTrust is a learned behavior that we gain from past experiences．（36）B Trust is a risk．But you can't be successful when there's a lack of trust in a relationship that results from an action where the wrongdoer takes no responsibility to fix the mistake．
Unfortunately，we've all been victims of betrayal．Whether we've been stolen from，lied to，misled，or cheated on，there are different levels of losing trust．Sometimes people simply can't trust anymore．（37）E It's understandable，but if you're willing to build trust in a relationship again，we have some steps you can take to get you there．
●（38）A Having confidence in yourself will help you make better choices because you can see what the best outcome would be for your well-being．
●（39）CIf you've been betrayed，you are the victim of your circumstance．But there's a difference between being a victim and living with a"victim mentality"．At some point in all of our lives，we'll have our trust tested or violated．
●You didn't lose"everything"．Once trust is lost，what is left？Instead of looking at the situation from this hopeless angle，look at everything you still have and be thankful for all of the good in your life．（40）G Instead，it's a healthy way to work through the experience to allow room for positive growth and forgiveness．
A．Learn to really trust yourself．
B．It is putting confidence in someone．
C．Stop regarding yourself as the victim．
D．Remember that you can expect the best in return．
E．They've been too badly hurt and they can't bear to let it happen again．
F．This knowledge carries over in their attitude toward their future relationships．
G．Seeing the positive side of things doesn't mean you're ignoring what happened．
分析 本文为社会生活类的说明文，文章介绍了信任的含义以及三种帮助我们重新建立信任关系的策略．一是学会信任自己，会使自己更幸福；二是不要把自己看成受害者，因为我们每个人都有过被背叛的经历；三是失去了信任并不是失去了一切，所以要看到事物的积极的一面．
解答 36．答案是B．细节理解题；根据上句"信任是我们从过去的经历中获取的一种行为"和下句"信任是一种冒险"可知，作者在分析trust的含义--信任是信赖某人；故选B．
37．答案是E．细节理解题；上句"有时，人们简直无法再信任（别人）了"；下句"这是可以理解的"，由此可推测本句应是解释人们无法信任某人的原因--受伤太重，不能忍受这样的事在发生；故填E．
38．答案是A．主旨大意题；由下句"对自己有信心能帮助你做出更好的选择"可知，前一句应是"学会真正信任自己"，故填A．
39．答案是C．细节理解题；由本段反复出现的关键词"victim 受害者"和最后一句"在我们所有人的生活中的某些时候，我们的信任会被检验或打破"可知，人人都有被背叛的经历，所以作者建议"不要认为自己是个受害者"；故选C．
40．答案是G．细节理解题；由上一句可知，作者提倡关注生活中的好的方面；副词"Instead"表示转折．可推测这里应是"看到事物积极的一面并不意味着你无视已经发生的事"．故填G．
点评 选五的做题首先要通读全文，了解文章大意．通读答案，找出相对应的关键词．根据文章整体结构，具体内容和上下文的逻辑关系，将选项填入文中．
练习册系列答案
相关题目
3．-Do you have anything planned for this afternoon？
-Yes．I'm going to ________a famous NBA player．（ ）
-Yes．I'm going to ________a famous NBA player．（ ）
| A． | interview | B． | cover | C． | impress | D． | revise |
1．Could your cellphone give you cancer？Whether it could or not，some people are worrying about the possibility that phones，powerlines and wi-fi （路由器） could be responsible for a range of illnesses，from rashes to brain tumours．
For example，Camilla Rees，48，a former investment banker in the US，moved out of her apartment in San Francisco because of the radiation coming from next door．Rees told the Los Angeles Times that when her neighbors moved in and installed a wi-fi router she lost her ability to think clearly．"I would wake up dizzy in the morning．I'd fall to the floor．I had to leave to escape that nightmare，"she said．Since then，she's been on a campaign against low-level electromagnetic fields，or EMFs（低频电磁场）．
And she's not alone．Millions of people say they suffer from headaches，depression，nausea and rashes when they're too close to cellphones or other sources of EMFs．
Although the World Health Organization has officially declared that EMFs seem to pose little threat，governments are still concerned．In fact，last April，the European Parliament called for countries to take steps to reduce exposure to EMFs．The city of San Francisco and the state of Maine are currently considering requiring cancer-warning labels on cellphones．
If these fears are reasonable，then perhaps we should all be worried about the amount of time we spend talking on our phones or plugging into wi-fi hotpots．
Some say there is evidence to support the growing anxieties．David Carpenter，a professor of environmental health sciences at the University at Albany，in New York，thinks there's a greater than 95% chance that power lines can cause childhood leukemia．Also there's a greater than 90% chance that cellphones can cause brain tumours．
But others believe these concerns are unreasonable paranoia （猜疑）．Dr Martha Linet，the head of radiation epidemiology at the US National Cancer Institute，has looked at the same research as Carpenter but has reached a different conclusion．"I don't support warning labels for cellphones，"said Linet．"We don't have the evidence that there's much danger．"
Studies so far suggest a weak connection between EMFs and illness-so weak that it might not exist at all．A multinational investigation of cellphones and brain cancer，in 13countries outside the US，has been underway for several years．It's funded in part by the European Union，in part by a cellphone industry group．
According to Robert Park，a professor of physics at the University of Maryland in the US，the magnetic waves aren't nearly powerful enough to break apart DNA，which is how known threats，such as UV rays and X-rays，cause cancer．
Perhaps it's just psychological．Some experts find that the electro-sensitivity syndrome seems to be similar to chemical sensitivity syndrome，which is a condition that's considered to be psychological．
Whether EMFs are harmful or not，a break in the countryside，without the cellphone，would probably be good for all of us．
For example，Camilla Rees，48，a former investment banker in the US，moved out of her apartment in San Francisco because of the radiation coming from next door．Rees told the Los Angeles Times that when her neighbors moved in and installed a wi-fi router she lost her ability to think clearly．"I would wake up dizzy in the morning．I'd fall to the floor．I had to leave to escape that nightmare，"she said．Since then，she's been on a campaign against low-level electromagnetic fields，or EMFs（低频电磁场）．
And she's not alone．Millions of people say they suffer from headaches，depression，nausea and rashes when they're too close to cellphones or other sources of EMFs．
Although the World Health Organization has officially declared that EMFs seem to pose little threat，governments are still concerned．In fact，last April，the European Parliament called for countries to take steps to reduce exposure to EMFs．The city of San Francisco and the state of Maine are currently considering requiring cancer-warning labels on cellphones．
If these fears are reasonable，then perhaps we should all be worried about the amount of time we spend talking on our phones or plugging into wi-fi hotpots．
Some say there is evidence to support the growing anxieties．David Carpenter，a professor of environmental health sciences at the University at Albany，in New York，thinks there's a greater than 95% chance that power lines can cause childhood leukemia．Also there's a greater than 90% chance that cellphones can cause brain tumours．
But others believe these concerns are unreasonable paranoia （猜疑）．Dr Martha Linet，the head of radiation epidemiology at the US National Cancer Institute，has looked at the same research as Carpenter but has reached a different conclusion．"I don't support warning labels for cellphones，"said Linet．"We don't have the evidence that there's much danger．"
Studies so far suggest a weak connection between EMFs and illness-so weak that it might not exist at all．A multinational investigation of cellphones and brain cancer，in 13countries outside the US，has been underway for several years．It's funded in part by the European Union，in part by a cellphone industry group．
According to Robert Park，a professor of physics at the University of Maryland in the US，the magnetic waves aren't nearly powerful enough to break apart DNA，which is how known threats，such as UV rays and X-rays，cause cancer．
Perhaps it's just psychological．Some experts find that the electro-sensitivity syndrome seems to be similar to chemical sensitivity syndrome，which is a condition that's considered to be psychological．
Whether EMFs are harmful or not，a break in the countryside，without the cellphone，would probably be good for all of us．
| Title：Could cellphones give you cancer？ | |
| Key points | Supporting details |
| Cellphones are （71）dangerous to use | ●Some people think it （72）possible for cellphones to cause cancer． ●Camilla Rees got ill after his neighbor installed a wi-fi router． ●Millions of people have the （73）same problems as Camilla． ●Some evidence supports people's anxieties． |
| Cellphones are safe to use | ●Some believe that these concerns are just paranoia． ●So far，studies show that there isn't much （74）connection between EMFs and illness． ●Robert Park thinks that the magnetic waves aren't powerful enough to （75）destroy DNA． ●It's just for psychological （76）reasons that people feel ill when they use cellphones． |
| Attitudes and （77）suggestions | ●Some governments are （78）concerned about the safety of cellphones or EMFs． ●The author thinks that we should（79）reduce the chance of talking on the phone or spend more time in the（80）rural areas without cellphones． |