题目内容

【题目】Mothers holding jobs outside the home should have ___ schedules to make it easier to care for their children.

A.heavy

B.smooth

C.flexible

D.complex

【答案】C

【解析】句意:担任离家工作的妈妈们的工作表安排应该灵活以确保她们照顾孩子来会更容易些。flexible表示灵活的,易改变的,符合语境;而heavy表示重的,smooth表示光滑的,complex表示复杂的

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】When did you last visit a shopping mall? In many places, the answer would be last weekend.Some people go even more often. Why? For one thing, malls offer goods and services that people need all in one place: food, clothing, things for their houses, entertainment, even medical services. So, are malls one of the highlights of modem civilization? Environmental activists would say No! They would go even further and say that consumer behavior is causing a huge enwronmental disaster. They cause consumers of ignorance of the side effect of their shopping-urban sprawl (扩大) .

Social scientists agree that patterns of development have changed the landscape a great deal in the last half century. Prior to 1950, most people lived in towns or cities and either walked to work or took public transportation. Only very wealthy people had automobiles. Farmers lived in rural areas or isolated villages and came into town only when they needed things they couldn’ t produce themselves. If you gazed at the landscape you would see towns surrounded by countryside. Then a massive change occurred.

Automobiles became affordable and people were quick to adopt them. Now ambitious workers could live in the suburbs, the areas just outside cities, which started to grow rapidly. As long as there was lots of cheap land in the suburbs, no one paid much attention to le usage of that land. Malls, fast food restaurants, cinemas, and car dealerships spread out in large, flat buildings. These one-storey buildings and their parking lot took up a great deal space. Well-meaning farmers thought they were better off selling their land than growing crops. In ignorance, no one realized that once the land was built up in urban sprawl, the good farming land would be ruined forever. There was no way to preserve it.

Only in recent years have people come to mourn the old way of life as they have developed insight into the problems of unconditional grows. Now people realize that urban sprawl has come with serious environmental problems. The negative aspects of sprawl include air and water pollution, loss of agricultural land, traffic jams, and the death of businesses in the old town centers. Many scholars think the time has come to analyze the problems better so we can develop appropriate policies to control further sprawl. Some think the best way to do is to educate citizens about their priceless environment.

【1】 What is mainly discussed in the passage?

A. Weekend Fun.

B. Urban Sprawl.

C. New Automobiles.

D. Isolated Villages.

【2】 What does the underlined word "They" refer to in the first paragraph?

A. Malls.

B. Activists.

C. Farmers.

D. Scientists.

【3】 Who do activists blame for environmental problems?

A. Endangered animals.

B. Shopping mall owners.

C. Unthinking shoppers.

D. Ambitious farmers.

【4】 What do scholars think should be done about urban sprawl?

A. Understand the situations better.

B. Follow customary policies.

C. Start school in shopping mails.

D. Charge polluters a lot of money.

【5】What is the scholars' attitude toward urban sprawl?

A. Respectful.

B. Disapproving.

C. Pessimistic.

D. Doubtful.

【题目】阅读下面的文字,完成下列各题。

美丽《诗经》

《诗经》是一个谜,它有太多的秘密没有揭开。可是,它实在太美了,使我们在殚精竭虑不胜疲惫的解谜失败之后,仍然对它恋恋不舍。

《诗经》与我们的距离主要体现在我们对它的无知上。我可以稍微武断一点地说,有关《诗经》的现有学术成果大多数是出于推断与猜测。对很多问题我们都各持见解而互不相让。即便有些问题看来已被公认,但那也正是全体的无能为力。我举几个例子。

正如大凡神圣人物总有一个神秘出身一样,《诗经》的出身也颇扑朔迷离。为了解答这个问题,便有了采诗说献诗说。班固和何休都有采诗之说,且都说得极有诗意。但仔细推敲他们的说法,却并无任何历史根据。司马迁就没有这种说法,《左传》中也无这种说法。但我们却又无力驳斥班固和何休,因为他们的说法虽然缺乏证据,却是一个合理的推断。更重要的是,否定这个说法,我们并不能提供一个更合理的说法。

与国风采诗说相配合的,便是大、小雅的来自公卿至于列士献诗。这种说法也只有《国语》召公谏厉王中的一个孤证,且这公卿至于列士献诗是否为公卿列士自作也成问题。况且,就一些尖锐的讽刺之作看,像《小雅·十月之交》中对皇父等七个用事大臣的点名揭批,大约也不是献诗的好材料。

《诗经》的搜集固然是一个问题,然而集中起来的诗,要把它按一定的规则编排成书,又是哪些人?最后毕其功的人是谁?司马迁说此人是孔子,这当然是最好的人选,但司马迁并没说明他这么说的证据。这个说法也受到后人的质疑。

就《诗经》本身,它的作者是一个更大的问题,但学术界已不把它当作问题,大家一致得过且过了。抗战前,朱东润先生在武汉大学《文哲季刊》上对国风是民歌的说法提出理据充分的质疑,却不见有什么反响。1981年朱先生又出版《诗三百篇探故》,仍没见什么回应。我私下认为这种尴尬其实很好理解:大家都不愿再惹事,得过且过。

上述种种学术疑问并不影响我们对《诗经》的欣赏和喜爱。正如一位绝世佳人,她吸引我们的是她的美丽和风韵,而不是她的身份和背景。

据《世说新语》载,东晋谢安曾问子弟《诗经》中何句最佳。他的侄子谢玄答:昔我往矣,杨柳依依;今我来思,雨雪霏霏。这是《小雅·采薇》末章的几句,确实很美,但如果谢太傅问我,我一定回答《陈风·月出》:

月出皎兮,佼人僚兮。舒窈纠兮,劳心悄兮。

月出皓兮,佼人懰兮。舒忧受兮,劳心慅兮。

月出照兮,佼人燎兮。舒夭绍兮,劳心惨兮。

(月亮出来明晃晃啊,那个美人真漂亮啊。步履款款身苗条啊,我的心儿扑扑跳啊。)

我曾用天堂的三个元素来评述这首诗。美是一种没有峭壁的高度,她不压迫我们,但仍让我们仰望;她不刺戮我们,但我们仍然受伤。她如此接近我们,却又如此远离我们;如此垂顾我们,却又如此弃绝我们。这个美丽的女子,是月夜的一部分,或者说,月夜是她的一部分,她与月已经构成了圆满,我们已无缘参与其间,但她如皎月泻辉般辐射出来的美,还是灼伤了我们的心。对这澄澈圆融的境界,我们能介入其中的,不,能奉献与之的,也只是这颗怦然而动的心……明月、美人和我们的心,是这首诗的三个主要意象。要知道,自然、美人和我们:天堂只要这三个元素就够了。

《诗经》305首,美丽的诗篇触目皆是,我只是举了一例。《诗经》毕竟是,我们要把它当来读。只有这样,才能挽救被学者们弄得面目可憎的古代诗歌的清誉。

【1】作者认为,有关《诗经》的现有学术成果大多数是出于推断与猜测。不属于其依据的一项是( )

A.司马迁和《左传》都没有提到采诗说,大、小雅中的讽刺之作应该不是献诗

B.司马迁虽然说到孔子是《诗经》的主编者,但没有提供证据。

C.《诗经》的作者是个大问题,但学术界已不把它当作问题,大家一致得过且过了。

D.朱东润先生对国风是民歌的说法提出了质疑,并且理据充分。

2文中用了比较多的笔墨写《陈风·月出》,对其作用的表述最正确的一项是( )

A.是为了解说作者对诗歌的评价标准,美丽的诗篇必须符合天堂的三个元素

B.是为了说明《小雅·采薇》末章的几句不是《诗经》中最美的,《诗经》最美的诗篇应该是《陈风·月出》。

C.是为了说明对《诗经》的学术研究无关紧要,不影响我们对《诗经》的欣赏和喜爱。

D.是为了说明《诗经》的美丽,《诗经》毕竟是,我们要把它当来读。

3根据本文提供的信息,下列推断正确的一项是( )

A.学术界对《诗经》很多问题的研究仍然莫衷一是,主要是年代久远,史料鲜有记载造成的。

B.《诗经》毕竟是,只有抛开充满疑问的学术研究,才能真正走进《诗经》美丽的境界。

C.自古以来人们总是殚精竭虑不胜疲惫通过读来解《诗经》的,这种不把《诗经》当来读的现象现在依然十分严重。

D.不仅仅是《诗经》,古代诗歌由于史料很少,普遍被学者们弄得面目可憎了。

【题目】阅读《短歌行》,回答下列各题。

短歌行

对酒当歌,人生几何!譬如朝露,去日苦多。慨当以慷,忧思难忘。何以解忧?唯有杜康。青青子衿,悠悠我心。但为君故,沉吟至今。呦呦鹿鸣,食野之苹。我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙。

明明如月,何时可掇?忧从中来,不可断绝。越陌度阡,枉用相存。契阔谈,心念旧恩。月明星稀,乌鹊南飞。绕树三匝,何枝可依?山不厌高,海不厌深。周公吐哺,天下归心。

1对《短歌行》中典故的解说不正确的一项是( )

A.青青子衿,悠悠我心出自《诗经·郑风·子衿》,原是一首女子思念男子的情诗,曹操用来表达自己对贤才的渴求。

B.呦呦鹿鸣,食野之苹。我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙。出自《诗经·小雅·鹿鸣》,原诗表现的是天子宴请群臣的盛况和宾主之间融洽的温情。

C.山不厌高,海不厌深化用《管子·形解》的话,用比喻手法说明自己渴望多纳贤才。”“表明了自己远大的志向。

D.周公吐哺是出自《史记·鲁周公世家》的一个典故。曹操在这里以周公自比,是说自己也有周公那样的胸襟,一定会热切殷勤地接待贤才。

【2】清人吴淇在读了曹操的《短歌行》后说:盖一厢口中饮酒,一厢耳中听歌,一厢心中凭空作想,想出这曲曲折折,絮絮叨叨,若连贯若不连贯,纯是一片怜才意思。谈谈你对这首诗的理解。

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网