题目内容

【写作内容】

下面是一场健康讲座的内容简介,请你用英语写一篇短文介绍讲座情况。

时间:上个月

演讲者:健康专家张教授

主题:久坐伤身

现状:随着电视电脑的发展,人们坐着的时间超过历史上任何时期

久坐的危害:颈痛,背痛,肥胖,心脏病,死亡

专家建议:学生,办公室工作者等久坐人群应养成好习惯:步行或骑自行车上学上班,不开车;走楼梯,不坐电梯;打电话时站立;学生下课期间要起身活动。

【写作要求】

只能用5个句子表达全部内容。

【评分标准】

句子结构准确,信息内容完整,篇章连贯。

 

 

 

 

Last month I attended a lecture delivered by Professor Zhang, a health expert, with the theme of “sitting for too long is bad for people’s health”. From the lecture I learned that with the development of TV and computers, people today sit a lot more than ever before in history, which has a bad effect on their health. Not only can this habit make your neck or back ache, but it may also make you fat, increase the risk of heart disease and even death. To prevent these problems from happening, Professor Zhang suggested that those who sit too much, such as students and office workers, should form some good habits in life, such as going to school or work on foot or by bike rather than by car, taking the stairs instead of the elevator and standing while talking on the phone. He particularly reminded us that we students should stand up to do some activities during break time at school.

【解析】

试题分析:题目要求写一篇英语短文,介绍健康讲座的相关情况。注意只能使用5个句子来表达全部的内容;不要出现标点和拼写错误,尽量保持卷面整洁、字体美观;注意行文的连贯性。

亮点说明:

范文涵盖了所有要点内容,并进行了适当的拓展;范文还使用了宾语从句、非谓语动词等语法知识,具备较强的语言运用能力。

语法方面:过去分词作定语delivered by Professor Zhang;不定式表目的to prevent these problems from happening;宾语从句①that with the development of TV and computers, people today sit a lot more than ever before,②that those who sit too much should form some good habits in life,③that we students should stand up to do some activities;定语从句①which has a bad effect on their health,②who sit too much;倒装Not only can this habit make your neck or back ache, but it may also make you fat等,显示了较强的语法功底,也使作文句式变得多样;

短语和搭配方面:范文使用了more than, have an effect on, prevent...from, such as, not only...but also, rather than, instead of等固定短语和搭配,使作文的内容变得充实。

考点:材料作文

 

练习册系列答案
相关题目

A scientist turns out to be able to see the future by offering each of some four-year-olds a piece of candy and watching how he or she deals with it. Some children reach eagerly for the treat they see. Some last a few minutes before they give in. But others are determined to wait until the last moment.

By the time the children reach high school, something remarkable has happened. A survey found that those who as four-year-olds had enough self-control to hold out generally grew up to be more popular, adventurous, confident and dependable. The children who gave in to temptation early were more likely to be lonely, easily frustrated and inflexible.

Actually, the ability to delay reward is a sign of emotional intelligence which doesn’t show up on an IQ test.

The hardware of the brain and the software of the mind have long been scientists’ concerns. But brain theory can’t explain what we wonder about most, like the question why some people remain upbeat in the face of troubles that would sink a less resistant soul.

Here comes the theory of Daniel Goleman, writer of Emotional Intelligence: when it comes to predicting people’s success, brain ability as measured by IQ may actually matter less than the qualities of mind once thought of as “character”.

EQ is not the opposite of IQ. What researchers have been trying to understand is how they work together; how one’s ability to handle stress, for instance, affects the ability to concentrate and put intelligence to use. Among the elements for success, researchers now generally agree that IQ counts for about 20%; the rest depends on everything from social class to luck.

While many researchers in this relatively new field are glad to see emotional issues finally taken seriously, some few fear EQ invites misuse.

1.The experiment with the four-year-olds makes it clear that ______.

A. the age of 4 is a proper time for scientific experiment

B. emotional intelligence won’t show up until adolescence

C. candy can be used to measure a person’s emotional intelligence

D. the ability of self-control plays a role in personal success

2.Which of the following is True of EQ and IQ according to the text?

A. Scientists are trying to discover the way in which EQ and IQ work together.

B. The higher a person’s IQ is, the higher his or her EQ is.

C. Some people can be blessed with lots of both, but some with little of either.

D. There is no link between EQ and IQ.

3.The underlined word “upbeat” in Paragraph 4 probably means ______.

A. optimistic B. floating

C. excited D. kind

4.What is most likely to be written in the paragraph that follows?

A. Information about famous people with high EQ.

B. Some reasons why EQ is a relatively new field.

C. Examples showing the opposite voice about EQ.

D. Strong demand for basic emotional education.

 

If you’re a male and you’re reading this, congratulations: you’re a survivor. According to statistics, you are more than twice as likely to die of skin cancer as a woman, and nine times more likely to die of AIDS. Assuming you make it to the end of your natural term, about 78 years for men in Australia, you’ll die on average five years before a woman.

There are many reasons for this--typically, men take more risks than women and are more likely to drink and smoke--but perhaps more importantly, men don’t go to the doctor.

“Men aren’t seeing doctors as often as they should,” says Dr. Gullotta. “This is particularly so for the over-40s, when diseases tend to strike.”

Gullotta says a healthy man should visit the doctor every year or two. For those over 45, it should be at least once a year.

Two months ago Gullotta saw a 50-year-old man who had delayed doing anything about his smoker’s cough for a year.

“When I finally saw him it had already spread and he has since died from lung cancer,” he says. “Earlier detection and treatment may not have cured him, but it would have prolonged his life.”

According to a recent survey, 95% of women aged between 15 and early 40s see a doctor once a year, compared to 70% of men in the same age group.

“A lot of men think they’re undefeatable,” Gullota says. “They only come in when a friend drops dead on the golf course and they think, ‘Geez, if it could happen to him, …’”

Then there’s the ostrich approach. “Some men are scared of what might be there and would rather not know,” says Dr. Ross Cartmill.

“Most men get their cars serviced more regularly than they service their bodies,” Cartmill says. He believes most diseases that commonly affect men could be addressed by preventive check-ups.

Regular check-ups for men would inevitably place strain on the public purse, Cartmill says. “But prevention is cheaper in the long run than having to treat the diseases. Besides, the ultimate cost is far greater: it is called premature death.”

1.Why does the author congratulate his male readers at the beginning of the passage?

A. They are more likely to survive serious diseases today.

B. Their average life span has been considerably extended.

C. They have lived long enough to read this article.

D. They are sure to enjoy a longer and happier life.

2.What does the author state is the most important reason men die five years earlier on average than women?

A. Men drink and smoke much more than women.

B. Men don’t seek medical care as often as women.

C. Men aren’t as cautious as women in face of danger.

D. Men are more likely to suffer from fatal diseases.

3.Which of the following best completes the sentence ‘Geez, if it could happen to him, …’ (Line 2, Para.8)?

A. it could happen to me, too

B. I should avoid playing golf

C. I should consider myself lucky

D. it would be a big misfortune

4.What does Dr. Ross Cartmill mean by “the ostrich approach” (Line 1, Para.9)?

A. A casual attitude towards one’s health conditions.

B. A new therapy for certain psychological problems.

C. Refusal to get medical treatment for fear of the pain involved.

D. Unwillingness to find out about one’s disease because of fear.

5.What does Cartmill say about regular check-ups for men?

A. They may increase public expenses.

B. They will save money in the long run.

C. They may cause psychological strains on men.

D. They will enable men to live as long as women.

 

Volunteering abroad is great. Not only do you travel to an exotic country, you also meet like-minded people, and at the end of it all you have something to put on your CV to impress employers with. But did you ever stop to think about how great it is for the people on the receiving end?

In this context, Daniela Papi has a point---foreigners rushing heroically to volunteer in a country they’ve never heard of are unlikely to make a difference. But turning volunteering camps into classrooms, as Papi seems to advocate in her article, risks throwing the baby out with the bath water by putting people off of volunteering.

Rather, learning should be a natural part of the experience, and the key to creating such an environment is positioning everyone as equals. In order for that to happen, volunteers need competent leaders who create an environment of equality:

When, a few years ago, I joined a group of international volunteers to help a small farming community in the Swiss Alps, we were all quite ignorant about the local conditions. But thanks to our group leader, it was both a helpful project for the locals and a fun and eye-opening experience for us.Before we had even traveled (at our own expense) to the mountaintop village, our group leader had spent time with the villagers preparing the project to make sure it would be of benefit to them. She arranged for us to help in different areas, ensuring that we always worked alongside locals rather than for them. It was never "us" and "them", but always "we", like a big family. As a result, conversation flowed and we learned a great deal just by casually talking to the locals as we worked.At the end, we left with a deep appreciation for the labor of love that goes into producing the food we eat every day一一an appreciation we could treasure ourselves and share with our peers.

Volunteering isn't about saving someone's life, or even about changing it. It's about touching a different world and reminding ourselves that there is much, much more to life than the daily routines we take for granted.With that knowledge, maybe, just maybe, we can go on to really change the world.

By Lukas Thibaut

1.From Paragraphs 1 and 2, we can learn that____in international volunteering.

A. foreigners are not welcome in some local communities

B. blind enthusiasm fails to make the experience rewarding

C. the author agrees with Daniela Papi's opinions

D. international volunteering is actually a poor approach to education

2.The underlined word "that" in Paragraph 3 refers to___,

A. a natural part of the experience

B.the learning of volunteering

C. creating such an environment

D. positioning everyone as equals

3.What contributed to the success of the author's volunteering project in the Alps?

A . The volunteers were quite familiar with Swiss farmers' lives.

B. The volunteers worked in areas separated from the locals.

C. The group leader ensured that the project would be beneficial to both sides.

D. The group leader ensured that the volunteers got to know the local conditions.

4.From the author's viewpoint, what should international volunteers avoid?

A. Placing themselves above the locals.

B. Taking food for granted.

C. Disrespecting others' labor.

D. Being proud of volunteering.

5.Which best describes the author's attitude toward international volunteering?

A. Objective.   B. Doubtful.

C. Disapproving.  D. Supportive.

 

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网