题目内容
interrupted by a knock at the door.
This was an age before telephones. Someone was delivering a message. When Coleridge got back to his
poem, he had lost his inspiration. His poetic mood had been broken by the knock on his door. His unfinished
poem, which could otherwise have been a masterpiece, would now never be more than a fragment (碎片,
片段).
This story tells how unexpected communication can destroy an important thought, which brings us to the
cell phone.
The most common complaint about cell phones is that people talk on them to the annoyance of people
around them. But marc damaging may be the cell phone's disruption of our thoughts.
We have already entered a golden age of little white lies about our call phones, and this is by and large a
healthy, productive development. "I didn't hear it ring" or "I didn't realize my cell phone had shut off" arc
among the lies we tell to give ourselves space where we're beyond reach.
The notion or idea of being unreachable is not a new concept-we havoc "Do Not Disturb" signs on the
doors of hotel rooms. So why must we feel guilty when it comes to cell phones? Why must we apologize if
we decide to shut off the phone for a while?
The problem is that we come from a long-established tradition of difficulty with distance communication.
Until the recent mass deployment of cell phones, it was easy to communicate with someone next to us or a
few feet away, but difficult with someone across town, the country or the globe. We came to take it for
granted.
But cell phones make long-distance communication common, and endanger our time by ourselves. Now
time alone, or conversation with someone next to us which cannot be interrupted by a phone, is something
to be cherished. Even cell phone devotees, myself usually included, can't help at times wanting to throw their
cell phone away, or curse the day they were invented.
But we don't and won't, and there really is no need. All that's required to take back our private time is a
general social recognition that we have the right to it.
In other words, we have to develop a healthy contempt for the rings of our phones. Given the case of
making and receiving cell phone calls, if we don-t talk to the caller right now, we surely will shortly later.
A cell phone call deserves no greater priority than a random word from a person next to us. Though the
call on my cell phone may be the one-in-a-million from Steven Spielberg-who has finally read my novel and
wants to make it his next movie. But most likely it is not, and I'm better off thinking about the idea I just had
for a new story, or the pizza I'll eat for lunch.
B. To show how important inspiration is to a poet.
C. To emphasize the disadvantage of not having a cell phone.
D. To encourage readers to read the works of this poet.
B. It is natural to tell lies about small things.
C. It is basically a good way to protect one's privacy.
D. We should feel guilty when we can't tell the truth.
B. People feel guilty when they are not able to answer their cell phones.
C. Cell phones interrupt people's private time.
D. With cell phones it is no longer possible to be unreachable.
B. Disrespect.
C. Like.
D. Value.
B. Steven Spielberg once called the author to talk about the author's novel.
C. You should always finish your lunch before you answer a call on the cell phone.
D. Never let cell phones interfere too much with your life.
| Welcome to my Message Board! | |
| Subject Slimming down classics? | |
| Mr. Handsome 2007-5-12&24 AM | Orion Books,which decides there is a market in creating cut-down classics(经典著作),is slimming down some novels by such great writers as L.Tolstoy,M.Mitchell and C.Bronte.Now,each of them has been whittled down to about 400 pages by cutting 30 to 40 per cent of the original,with words,sentences,paragraphs and,in a few cases,chapters removed.The first six shortened editions,all priced at £6.99 and advertised as great reads “in half the time”,will go on sale next month,with plans for 50 to 100 more to follow.The publishing house believes that modern readers will welcome the shorter versions. |
| Mr. Edwards 2007-5-12 9:40 AM | Well,I’m publisher of Orion Group.Thanks for your attention,Mr.Handsome. I must say,the idea developed from a game of “shame”in my office.Each of us was required to confess(承认)to the most embarrassing blanks in his or her reading.I admitted that I had never read Anna Karenina and tried but failed to get through Gone with the Wind several times.One of my colleagues acknowledged skipping(跳读)Jane Eyre.We realised that life is too short to read all the books you want to and we never were going to read these ones. As a leading publishing house,we are trying to make classics convenient for readers but it’s not as if we’re withdrawing the original versions.They are still there if you want to read them. |
| Ms.Weir 2007-5-12 11:35 AM | I’m director of the online bookclub www.lovereading.co.uk. Mr.Edwards,I think your shortened editions is a breath of fresh air.I’m guilty of never having read Anna Karenina,because it’s just so long.I’d much rather read two 300-page books than one 600-page book.I am looking forward to more shortened classics! |
| Mr. Crockatt 2007-5-124:38 PM | I’m from the London independent bookshop Crockatt & Powell. In my opinion,the practice is completely ridiculous.How can you edit the classics?I’m afraid reading some of these books is hard work,and that is why you have to develop as a reader.If people don’t have time to read Anna Karenina,then fine.But don’t read a shortened version and kid yourself it’s the real thing. |
| A.opposes the reading of original classics |
| B.is embarrassed for cutting down classics |
| C.thinks cut-down classics have a bright future |
| D.is cautious in its decision to cut down classics |
| A.make them easier to read |
| B.meet a large demand in the market |
| C.increase the sales of literary books |
| D.compete with their original versions |
| A.speaks highly of the cut-down classics |
| B.shows gailty of the original classics |
| C.feels guilty of not reading the classics |
| D.disapproves of shortening the classics |
| A.reading the classic works is a confusing attempt |
| B.shortening the classics does harm to the original |
| C.publishing the cub-down classics is a difficult job |
| D.editing the classic works satisfies children’s needs |
Britain is set to face an increase in cold winters, with up to one-in-seven hitting the UK with longer periods of time when temperatures are below freezing, a study has suggested.The prediction was based on research that found out how low solar activi
ty affected winter weather patterns.
However, the researchers were eager to stress that their findings did not suggest that the region was about to fall suddenly into a "little ice age".The findings appear in the journal Environmental Research Letters."We could get to the point where one-in-seven winters are very cold, as we had at the start of last winter and all through the winter before last," said co-author Mike Lockwood, professor of space environment physics at the University of Reading.
Using the Central England Temperature (CET) record, the world's longest instrumental data series that dates back to 1659, the team said that in general temperatures during recent winters had been obviously lower than the longer-term temperatures."The mean CET for December, January and February for the recent relatively cold winters of 2008 ~ 2009 and 2009~2010 were 3.50℃ and 2.53℃ respectively," they wrote.
"However, the mean value for the previous 20 winters had been 5.04℃.The series of lower winter temperatures in the UK during the last three years had raised questions about the probability of more similar, or even colder, winters occurring in the future."
Last year.Professor Lockwood and colleagues published a paper that found a link between fewer sunspots and atmospheric conditio
ns that "blocked" warm westerly winds reaching Europe during winter months, opening the way for cold easterly winds from the Arctic and Russia to sweep across the region.Professor Lockwood, while acknowledging that there were a range of possible meteorological factors (气象因素) that could influence blocking events, said the latest study moved things forward by showing that there was "impro
vement in the predictive skill" when solar activity was taken into consideration.
【小题1】We can know from the second paragraph that _____.
| A.research shows that Britain will soon fall into an ice age |
| B.Mike Lockwood's research focuses on space environment physics |
| C.it was quite cold in Britain over the entire winter last year |
| D.so far one-in-seven winters have been very cold in Britain |
| A.average | B.stable | C.ungenerous | D.changeable |
| A.It was sunspots that blocked warm westerly winds reaching Europe. |
| B.Meteorological factors hardly have any influence on blocking events. |
| C.The latest study done by Professor Lockwood was of little practical value. |
| D.Considering solar activity or not affects the accuracy of weather forecasting. |
| A.Another big danger approaching the UK |
| B.Research finds out solar activity is to blame for the cold |
| C.UK faces more cold winters due to weaker solar activity |
| D.Changes in weather patterns should be responsible for low solar activity |