1 So far nobody has claimed the money in the library. A. discovered B. to be discovered C. discovering D. having discovered 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

题目内容

So far nobody has claimed the money in the library.

A. discovered B. to be discovered C. discovering D. having discovered

【答案】

【解析】

试题分析：考查分词做定语的用法。当名词与动词之间构成被动关系的时候，使用过去分词表示；如果二者构成主动关系，使用现在分词的形式表示。本题的money与discover构成被动关系，故使用过去分词的形式。排除CD项。B项中的不定式指将来的事情。故也排除。句意：到目前为止，没有人来认领在图书馆里被发现的那些钱。故A正确。

考点：考查分词做定语的用法

点评：当名词与动词之间构成被动关系的时候，使用过去分词表示；如果二者构成主动关系，使用现在分词的形式表示。

练习册系列答案

相关题目

阅读理解

阅读短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。

　　Every pet owner loves his pet．There is no argument here．

　　But when we asked our readers whether they would clone their beloved animals, the responses were split almost down the middle．Of the 228 readers who answered it, 108 would clone, 111 would not and nine weighed each side without offering an opinion．

　　Clearly, from readers' response, this is an issue that reaches deeply into both the joy and eventual sadness of owning a pet．It speaks, as well, to people's widely differing expectations over the developing scientific procedure．

　　Most of the respondents who favored the idea strongly believed it would produce at least a close copy of the original; many felt the process would actually return an exact copy．Those on the other side, however, held little hope a clone could never truly recreate a pet, many simply didn't wish to go against the natural law of life and death．

　　Both sides expressed equal love for their animals．More than a few respondents owned“the best dog/cat in the world”．They thought of their pets as their “best friend”,“a member of the family ,”“the light of my life．” They told moving stories of pets' heroism, intelligence and selfless devotion．

　　Little wonders the loss is so disturbing－and the cloning so attractive．“People become very close to their animals, and the loss can be just as hard to bear as when a friend or family member dies ,”says Gary Kowalski, author of Goodbye, Friend：Healing Wisdom for Anyone Who Has Ever Lost a Pet．“For me, cloning feels like an attempt to turn death away…It's understandable．Death is always painful．It's difficult to deal with．It's hard to accept．”

　　But would cloning reduce the blow? This question seemed to be at the heart of this problem．

(1)

So far as the cloning of pets is concerned, a recent survey shows that, of all pet owners, ________．
[　　]
A．	a lot more of them are for it
B．	a lot more of them are against it
C．	very few of them are willing to tell their opinions
D．	about half of them are for it and the other half against it

(2)

While talking about the respondents from the readers, the expression “eventual sadness of owning a pet”refers to ________．
[　　]
A．	the death of one's pet
B．	the high cost of owning a pet
C．	the troubles one has to deal with in keeping a pet
D．	the dangers involved in the cloning of a pet

(3)

From what Gary Kowalski says, we can know that he ________．
[　　]
A．	has never thought about the problem of cloning
B．	is going to write another book on pets
C．	is in favor of the idea of cloning pets
D．	is all against the cloning of pets

(4)

What is the key question at the heart of the problem of cloning pets?
[　　]
A．	Can cloning make the pain one suffers less when a pet dies?
B．	Can pet owners afford the cost of cloning?
C．	Does cloning go against the law of nature?
D．	How reliably does cloning produce an exact copy of one's pet?

阅读理解

　　British scientists may have discovered the reason why red wine appears to protect the heart．They say natural chemicals found in red wine appear to protect against blocked blood vessels(血管)．The chemical substances are called poly-phenols(多酚)．They come from the outer covering of grapes．They are not present in other alcoholic drinks．

　　Researchers say their discovery explains why many people in southern Europe can eat fatty foods and still have a low risk of heart disease．People in France, for example, have lower rates of heart disease than Americans do．Yet the traditional French diet includes butter, cheese and other foods high in cholesterol(胆固醇)．This led the British scientists to examine another important part of the French diet－red wine．Several earlier studies have suggested that people who drink proper amounts of alcohol may reduce their risk of heart disease．

　　The British team experimented with cells from the blood vessels of cows．The scientists studied the effects of twenty-three kinds of red wine on the cow cells．They found that poly-phenols from all of the red wines stopped production of a protein called endothelin(内皮素)．This protein causes blood vessels to become smaller．Scientists believe endothelin is linked to hardening of the blood vessels, which is a cause of heart disease．

　　The scientists found that the decrease in endothelin levels was linked to the amount of poly-phenols in the wines．The British team performed similar experiments with two other kinds of wine, white and rose．These wines contain little or no poly-phenols because the grape skins are removed before the wine is made．White and rose wines had no effect on endothelin levels．

　　The scientists also studied the effect of non-alcoholic juice made from red grapes．They found that grape juice slowed the production of endothelin, but was much less effective than the red wines．

(1)

So far as grapes are concerned, _________ is more effective on reducing the risk of heart disease．
[　　]
A．	the outer part of grapes
B．	the inner part of grapes
C．	the seeds of grapes
D．	the juice in grapes

(2)

What made the British scientists study another important part of the French diet?
[　　]
A．	Traditional French diet．
B．	Lower risk of heart disease of the French．
C．	The reason why people drink wine．
D．	Poly-phenols not existing in other things．

(3)

From this passage, we may know people’s health is linked to．
[　　]
A．	diet habits
B．	their genes
C．	their education
D．	living surroundings

(4)

What’s the best title for this passage?
[　　]
A．	A Healthy Diet
B．	Protecting Your Heart
C．	Red Wine and Health
D．	A Study on Health

Every pet owner loves his pet. There is no argument here.

　　But when we asked our readers whether they would clone their beloved animals, the responses were split almost down the middle. Of the 228 readers who answered it, 108 would clone, 111 would not and nine weighed each side without offering an opinion.

　　Clearly, from readers’ response, this is an issue that reaches deeply into both the joy and eventual sadness of owning a pet. It speaks, as well, to people’s widely differing expectations over the developing scientific procedure.

　　Most of the respondents who favored the idea strongly believed it would produce at least a close copy of the original; many felt the process would actually return an exact copy. Those on the other side, however, held little hope a clone could never truly recreate a pet, many simply didn’t wish to go against the natural law of life and death.

　　Both sides expressed equal love for their animals. More than a few respondents owned “the best dog/cat in the world”. They thought of their pets as their “best friend”, “a member of the family,” “the light of my life.” They told moving stories of pets’ heroism, intelligence and selfless devotion.

　　Little wonders the loss is so disturbing—and the cloning so attractive. “People become very close to their animals, and the loss can be just as hard to bear as when a friend or family member dies,” says Gary Kowalski, author of Goodbye, Friend: Healing Wisdom for Anyone Who Has Ever Lost a Pet. “For me, cloning feels like an attempt to turn death away…It’s understandable. Death is always painful. It’s difficult to deal with. It’s hard to accept.”

　But would cloning reduce the blow? This question seemed to be at the heart of this problem.

1.So far as the cloning of pets is concerned, a recent survey shows that, of all pet owners, __________.

A. a lot more of them are for it

B. a lot more of them are against it

C. very few of them are willing to tell their opinions

D. about half of them are for it and the other half against it

2.While talking about the respondents from the readers, the expression “eventual sadness of owning a pet” refers to _________.

A. the death of one’s pet

B. the high cost of owning a pet

C. the troubles one has to deal with in keeping a pet

D. the dangers involved in the cloning of a pet

3. In spite of their differences on the problem of cloning, it seems that ________.

A. all pet owners try to go against the natural law of life and death

B. all pet owners love their pets very much

C. people who support cloning love their pets more

D. people who dislike cloning love their pets more

4.From what Gary Kowalski says, we can know that he _________.

A. has never thought about the problem of cloning

B. is going to write another book on pets

C. is in favor of the idea of cloning pets

D. is all against the cloning of pets

5.What is the key question at the heart of the problem of cloning pets?

A. Can pet owners afford the cost of cloning?

B. Can cloning make the pain one suffers less when a pet dies?

C. Does cloning go against the law of nature?

D. How reliably does cloning produce an exact copy of one’s pet?

Every pet owner loves his pet. There is no argument here.

　　But when we asked our readers whether they would clone （克隆，复制）their beloved animals, the responses（反应） were split almost down the middle. Of the 228 readers who answered it, 108 would clone, 111 would not and nine weighed each side without offering an opinion.

　　Clearly, from readers’ response, this is an issue that reaches deeply into both the joy and final sadness of owning a pet. It speaks, as well, to people’s widely differing expectations over the developing scientific procedure.

　　Both sides expressed equal love for their animals. More than a few respondents owned “the best dog/cat in the world”. They thought of their pets as their “best friend”, “a member of the family,”“the light of my life.” They told moving stories of pets’ heroism, intelligence and selfless devotion.

　　Then the loss is so disturbing---and the cloning so attractive. “People become very close to their animals, and the loss can be just as hard to bear as when a friend or family member dies,” says Gary Kowalski, author of Goodbye, Friend: Healing Wisdom for Anyone Who Has Ever Lost a Pet. “For me, cloning feels like an attempt to turn death away…It’s understandable. Death is always painful. It’s difficult to deal with. It’s hard to accept.”

　　But would cloning reduce the blow? This question seemed to be at the heart of this problem.

1.So far as the cloning of pets is concerned, a recent survey shows that, of all pet owners, ____.

A．a lot more of them are for it

B．a lot more of them are against it

C．very few of them are willing to tell their opinions

D．about half of them are for it and the other half against it

2.While talking about the respondents from the readers, the expression “final sadness of owning a pet” refers to ____.

A．the death of one’s pet

B．the high cost of owning a pet

C．the troubles one has to deal with in keeping a pet

D．the dangers about the cloning of a pet

3.From what Gary Kowalski says, we can know that he ____.

A．has never thought about the problem of cloning

B．is going to write another book on pets

C．is in favor of the idea of cloning pets

D．is all against the cloning of pets

4.What is the key question at the heart of the problem of cloning pets?

A．Can cloning make the pain one suffers less when a pet dies?

B．Can pet owners afford the cost of cloning?

C．Does cloning go against the law of nature?

D．How reliably does cloning produce an exact copy of one’s pet?

试题分类