People regarded that Napoleon’s at Waterloo was his last mishap in his life. A. success B. conquer C. defeat D. beat 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

题目内容

People regarded that Napoleon’s ______ at Waterloo was his last mishap in his life.

A. success 　　　　 B. conquer 　　　　 C. defeat 　　　 D. beat

选项A和B的含义不对：success（成功），conquer（战胜）；D项作名词没有“失败”的含义。本句的意思是“人们把拿破仑在滑铁卢的失败视为他人生的最终劫难”。

练习册系列答案

相关题目

【小题1】 If you happen to be the 200th customer to buy Cholesterolblock, you will .

A．be able to buy it at a low price	B．be the luckiest one online
C．try it free of charge	D．change your diet

【小题2】Liptor®, Zocor®, Crestor® are .

【小题3】 Cholestrolblock^TMhas the following advantages EXCEPT that _____________________.

A．it helps take cholesterol out of whatever food you eat.

B．it has been proved useful in hospital testing.

C．it helps people absorb at least 42% cholesterol.

D．it sells best on Internet every month.

【小题4】Where can you most probably read this passage?

A．In a travel guide book.	B．On a university bulletin board.
C．In a health magazine.	D．In a doctor's prescription.

It’s the dirty little secret many shampoo companies don’t want you to know. When you wash your hair with certain traditional chemical shampoos, you may actually be removing your hair and scalp（头皮）of their natural oils. These shampoos generate a thick bubble to clean hair, they can also create dryness, curl, dullness, and color fade. We then spend a lot of time and money on products that are effectively repairing the damage caused by shampoo.

Chaz Dean got tired of clients leaving his salon raving about their color and the feeling of their hair---brassy（似黄铜的） and dull. He knew the main cause was likely their shampoo, so he started experimenting with various ingredients, including natural herbs and botanicals, that he knew had cleansing（弄干净）and hydrating (保湿的) properties.

The result was a totally new approach to the way we cleanse our hair. It’s called WEN® Cleansing Conditioner. WEN® contains a super-hydrating natural herbs and botanicals mixture of glycerin, chamomile(甘菊), rosemary, calendula, and Cherry bark, which when combined, will both cleanse the hair as well as give shine and softness, even to damaged hair.

WEN® is a 5-in-1 formula（配方） that takes the place of your shampoo, And the most amazing thing about it is that it cleanses without bubble. Instead, when mixed with water, it creates a smooth bubble for shiny, healthy-looking, manageable results. The first time you try it certainly feels strange, but the results speak for themselves.

Before being marketed, WEN® went through extensive consumer tests, and the results were impressive. More than 90 percent of the participants in the studies reported that their hair was more shiny, less frizzy, and had more bounce.

WEN® is recommended for all hair types, and once you start using it, it will become the only cleanser/conditioner you will want to include in your daily routine.

Right now, WEN® is offering an easy way for online shoppers to try the product. Now you just pay less than $30 and have a 60 day money back guarantee if you are not completely satisfied. Click here to learn more about WEN® and try this revolutionary new approach yourself.

1.We can infer from the first paragraph that _________________

A. All the shampoo companies are irresponsible.

B. Few traditional shampoos depend on chemicals for cleaning.

C. WEN® does harm to people’s hair.

D. It takes much time and money to repair hair damaged by shampoo.

2.What is the meaning of the underlined phrase “ raving about”(in para.2)?

A. smiling satisfactorily at B. shouting angrily for

C. crying excitedly for D. sighing silently at

3.Which is right according to the passage?

A. WEN® contains natural herbs and botanicals.

B. You cann’t use WEN® without bubble.

C. WEN® hasn’t been tested before selling.

D. WEN® is accessible only online.

4.Which is the best title of the passage?

A. Why are shampoos a waste of money B. Why do we need shampoos

C. WEN® is your best choice. D. WEN® has good guarantee

5.Where does the passage come from ?

A. magazine B. website C. newspaper D. text

1. If you happen to be the 200th customer to buy Cholesterolblock, you will .

A. be able to buy it at a low price B. be the luckiest one online

C. try it free of charge D. change your diet

2.Liptor®, Zocor®, Crestor® are .

A. diseases B. side effects C. medicines D. cholesterol

3. Cholestrolblock^TMhas the following advantages EXCEPT that _____________________.

A. it helps take cholesterol out of whatever food you eat.

B. it has been proved useful in hospital testing.

C. it helps people absorb at least 42% cholesterol.

D. it sells best on Internet every month.

4.Where can you most probably read this passage?

A．In a travel guide book. B．On a university bulletin board.

C．In a health magazine. D．In a doctor's prescription.

Originally, both the British and the American spoke with a rhotic accent. Rhotic essentially means an accent where the letter “r” is pronounced strongly after a vowel (元音). Rhotic accents are strong in both the US and Scotland, but seem to have disappeared from British English and its derivatives, such as Australian English and New Zealand English.

The major American accent –– the typical accent of the mid-western US –– is rhotic, and British English is, as a rule, non-rhotic. Specifically, US speakers pronounce every “r”, wherever they appear in a word. Most British speakers (and you will note that there are some British Isle accents that are strongly rhotic, like US) do not pronounce every “r”. Americans stress the “r” at the end of words such as “teacher” or “neighbour”, but in many non-rhotic British accents it is more of a “schwa” (an unstressed sound) so it comes out as, “teacha” (unstressed) or “neighba”.

This main difference also differs across the country of origin. For example, the US has a clear difference in the accents between people of the north and south, not to mention less clear differences across the states. Similarly, British people have a different accent according to their locality. The “cockney (伦敦东区)” accent is greatly different to the middle and upper class accents.

Another common difference appears to be that Americans pronounce words such as “herbal” without the “h”. Syllables (音节) may be stressed differently, too. “Oregano” in the US tends to be pronounced “o–reg–a–no” while in British English it is more likely to be “o–reg–AH–no”.

【小题1】When a rhotic accent occurs, ______.

A. the letter “r” is silent in any positions B. the letter “r” is sounded after a vowel

C. the ending syllable of a word is stressed D. the ending syllable of a word is unheard

【小题2】The underlined word “derivatives” in the first paragraph probably means “_____”.

A. neighbours B. ancestors C. symbols D. branches

【小题3】In non-rhotic British accents, ______.

A. “bother” sounds the same as “buther” B. “cheaper” sounds the same as “chapter”

C. “worker” sounds the same as “worka” D. “painting” sounds the same as “paintin”

【小题4】Even in the original country of the specific English language, accents differ ____.

A. from area to area B. from person to person

C. from word to word D. from stress to stress

【小题5】American people trend to pronounce words like “herbal” with the “h” ______.

A. stressed B. silent C. changed D. loud

阅读理解。

     You may have heard the popular saying, "there are always more fish in the sea". But as many new
studies show, fish populations are changing, and not necessarily for the better.
     Consider the case of big, predatory (食肉动物) fish. These giants, like sharks and cod (鳕鱼), eat
other smaller fish. Big fish are an important part of the marine ecosystem (海洋生态系统) because they
keep down the numbers of smaller fish. Without fish that eat other fish, populations of smaller swimmers
would increase, eating more plants, and leaving less vegetation for other creatures, including future fish.
     As fierce as predators can be, they're no match for fishing technology. Many people love to catch
predatory fish like sharks, cod and tuna, and new studies suggest that over-fishing is threatening these
creatures near the top of the marine food chain.
     In one study, Villy Christensen and his colleagues looked at 200 past studies of marine life to learn
how fish populations have changed over time. Christensen reported that between 1910 and 1970, the
numbers of big predators decreased slowly, and that in 1970 their populations really started to drop.
Around that time, fishing ships began using new tools that led to more fish being caught. The numbers
have been falling quickly ever since.
     Reg Watson looked at the problem from the perspective of the fishermen. In the middle of the 20th
century, Watson reported, fishing boats didn't go far from home, and most fish were caught near the
shore. That was no longer true by the 1980s. By then, fishing had moved farther from shore, into the
open oceans, and was helped by the development of new technologies. But since the 1990s, something
has changed. Despite new technologies and more efforts, fishing operations have not continued to
develop.
     Scientists study historical data to understand the present, and this research is needed to forecast the
future of fish and fishing. And the forecast doesn't look good: large predator fish are becoming harder to
find, and soon may disappear.

1. From Paragraph 2 we can learn that .

A. more big fish are breeding in the ocean
B. the fewer smaller fish, the more big fish
C. big fish are less important than smaller fish
D. the numbers of smaller fish are controlled by big fish

2. Why did the number of big predators begin to fall quickly in 1970?

A. Fishing ships began using new tools with which they could catch more fish.
B. There were fewer smaller fish than before.
C. There were more people catching big predators.
D. Their environment was being polluted by fishing ships.

3. Which of the following would scientists most probably agree with?

A. It may soon be difficult to find large predator fish.
B. It will cost much more in the future to catch big fish.
C. Smaller fish still give the fishing industry a bright future.
D. It is tough for researchers to forecast the future of fish.

4. What can we conclude from the passage?

A. The decrease of the number of smaller fish has changed the marine food chain.
B. Big fish have to live in the deep sea to avoid being caught.
C. Over-fishing with new technology accounts for the decrease of the number of big fish.
D. The decreasing populations of small fish lead to fewer big fish.

试题分类