题目内容
BEIJING, March 9—The central government will require an additional three years of use for official vehicles for ministers and governors to reduce the costs of purchasing new cars, media have reported.
The new rule has been applied among all Party and government departments nationwide, the Beijing News reported on Tuesday. The new rule has not yet been made public, said Li, a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference National Committee.
Under the old rules, the cars used by minister-level officials could be replaced as often as every five years, Li said. These officials will also retain the same cars when they assume new posts, he added.
The new rule also reiterated(重申) that officials ranking below minister-or governor-levels should not be allocated(分配) cars. The cars possessed by their departments should be used on demand.
“It violates(违反) the rules for lower-ranking-even county-level-officials to be allocated cars, “Li said.
Purchases of vehicles for official use have been heavily investigated, as they account for a large expenditure of public funds every year.
A survey on the Web news www. ifeng. com found 64 percent of respondents believed the new rule will be difficult to implement(执行实施) because it is related to officials’ interests.
“Local government departments had halted approvals for requests for such vehicles and had started to work on new quotas under the new rules.” Li said.
“The future reform of official vehicle use will introduce market mechanisms and monetization.”
Premier Wen Jiabao said in the annual government work report on Saturday that expenditures on such vehicles will not increase in 2011 compared with a year ago.
Beijing’s standing deputy mayor Ji Lin last week said the municipal government will release the number of vehicles for official use in the capital as early as at the end of this month.
Earlier this month, the Ministry of Finance had published a rule regulating the budgets for such vehicles.
1.What is the purpose of the new rule allocating vehicles among officials?
A. To promote a low-carbon lifestyle.
B. To cut down the present huge expenditures of purchasing cars.
C. To make good use of the budgets for official cars.
D. To solve the problem of severe traffic jam.
2.How often could the care used by minister-level officials be replaced according to the new rule?
A. Every 3 years. B. Every 5 years.
C. Every 8 years. D. Every 10 years.
3.What about the officials ranking below minister-or governor-levels in terms of official vehicles?
A. They can still possess special cars.
B. They can use their own private cars.
C. They can use cars whenever officially necessary.
D. They can be allocated second-hand cars.
4.What is the public’s attitude toward the new rule’s fulfillment?
A. Skeptical. B. Optimistic.
C. Indifferent. D. Passive.
1.B
2.C
3.C
4.A
【解析】
试题分析: 本文叙述了公车配备使用管理办法规定,省部级官员配车,使用年限从5年一换变为8年一换,厅局级以下干部,按以前的规定也是不配专车,而现在很多县乡一级干部也违规配备了专车。虽然执行新法有一定困难,但是政府决定还是要实行新法。
1.B细节理解题。根据第一段提到The central government will require an additional three years of use for official vehicles for ministers and governors to reduce the costs of purchasing new cars, media have reported.减少购车的开支,故选B
2.C细节理解题。根据第一段提到The central government will require an additional three years of use for official vehicles for ministers and governors to reduce the costs of purchasing new cars, 和第三段Under the old rules, the cars used by minister-level officials could be replaced as often as every five years, 以前是5年更换,现在又增加三年,所以八年的时间,故选C。
3.C细节理解题。根据第四段提到The cars possessed by their departments should be used on demand.根据所需用车,故选C。
4.A细节理解题。根据倒数第六段提到A survey on the Web news www.ifeng.com found 64 percent of respondents believed the new rule will be difficult to carry out because it is related to officials’ interests. 64%的人们认为很难执行,故选A。
考点:政治经济类阅读。
随着人们生活水平的提高,越来越多的人拥有了自己的汽车。你班同学就此展开讨论,提出两种不同的观点和看法。请你根据所提供的信息给报社写一封信,客观介绍这两种看法。
学生 | 观点 |
赞同者
| 1.方便、快捷、舒适的交通工具; 2.反映出国民生活条件提高,国家富强; 3.带动其他行业发展。
|
反对者
|
1.废气污染严重; 2.汽车过多影响交通,导致更多事故; 3.停车问题日益突出。
|
注意:1.词数100左右。开头已为你写好,不计入总词数。
2.可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we recently had about whether it is good or not for families to own cars.
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Yours truly,
Li Hua