题目内容
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly.As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurse alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have copper-bottomed research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding . The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5, 7 , 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ (智商)scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid timetable. This
Research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample (样本)of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s,taking account of parental education,family income,a child’s sex and age,the mother’s health and feeling style.These results don’t surprise me.Feeling according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeling practices.
61.According to Paragraph 2,one reason why a baby cries is that it feels______.
A.sick B.upset C.sleepy D.hungry
62.What does the author think about Dr King?
A.He is strict B.He is unkind
C.He has the wrong idea. D.He sets a timetable for mothers
63.The word copper-bottomed in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to _________.
A.basic B.reliable C.surprising D.interesting
64.What does the research tell us about feeling a baby on demand?
A.The baby will sleep well. B.The baby will have its brain harmed.
C.The baby will have a low blood sugar level. D.The baby will grow to be wiser by the age of 8.
65.The author supports feeling the baby_______.
A.in the night B.every four hours
C.whenever it wants food D.according to its blood sugar level
DCBDC
Dear Economist,
My newly-wedded wife and I are deeply in love.There is, however, one issue that threatens the happiness of our marriage.I absolutely insist on shopping at Walmart.My wife, meanwhile, would rather avoid Walmart at all costs.
I have recently tried to convince her that not only does Walmart offer the lowest prices known to man, but that the chain is also a force for good―lower prices mean better standards of living for all consumers, increased global trade means a tighter-knit(紧密团结的) international community, and efficient operations translate into higher productivity growth for the economy.My wife complains about poor labour policies, the “fact” that Walmart squeezes suppliers, and that it puts local shops out of business.
Who is right? Will our marriage survive?
Brian Gee
Dear Brian,
I have to agree with you about Walmart.Jason Furman, then an economist at New York University, now an adviser to President Obama, famously argued in 2005 that Walmart was unwittingly (不知不觉地) a progressive success story.The chain’s prices don’t much affect me (I prefer Whole Foods) but Furman estimated that they benefited low-and-middle-income Americans to the sum of around $250 billion a year.
Walmart does not pay much, so it may depress wages.Then again, it may increase wages by offering jobs to the otherwise-unemployed.Either way, the benefits of low prices to Walmart shoppers far outweigh any seemingly reasonable costs to Walmart employees.And while it is true that Walmart employees tend to be poor, the same is true of Walmart shoppers.
Armed with this information you can face your wife with confidence.You are sure to win the conversation.The divorce is likely to be more argued.
Economist
【小题1】What concerns Brian Gee so much that he wrote the letter?
| A.His wife refuses to shop at Walmart. |
| B.They are faced with a divorce. |
| C.They can’t afford the costs of shopping at Walmart. |
| D.They are in conflict about shopping at Walmart. |
| A.it is wrong for Walmart to depress its employees’ wages |
| B.consumers’ lives have improved thanks to Walmart |
| C.Walmart’s business operation increases productivity in economy |
| D.Walmart’s business increases global trade |
| A.Some employees accept the low pay to keep the job. |
| B.Walmart appeals to only poor consumers and poor employees. |
| C.Employees suffer from Walmart’s low prices more than consumers. |
| D.Jason Furman, a New York University economist, spoke highly of Walmart. |
---Has Tom finished his composition yet?
---I have no idea, he _____ it this morning.
|
A.would write |
B.has written |
C.wrote |
D.was writing |