题目内容
Someone at work gave my son, Sean, a red balloon on a string, and you would have thought it was the moon! __16__ don’t often come to my three-year-old son. Nor me! I was thankful for my job at a day-care centre, which enabled me to afford my son’s education, but it didn’t pay much. I had been so full of __17__ before doing it. Now it seemed like I would be forever struggling. I __18__ to tie the balloon to Sean’s wrist for our walk to the car. “I’m already a __19__ boy!” he said, pulling his hand away.
“Promise you will hold on to it __20__?” I said. Sean nodded. He didn’t know how quickly __21__ in life could float away.
A warm breeze blew through the car window. I heard a __22__ on the ceiling. “My balloon!” he shouted. The balloon was out of the window! I pulled over, but it had already gone up into the sky. Sean __23__.
I also felt sad, but there was nothing I could do. He might have __24__ the balloon, but on the way home two weeks later, __25__ in traffic and fog, I was still thinking about it. How am I going to make a __26__ life for Sean and me, God, if I can’t even hold a red balloon for him? Just then a man in his 30s who looked neat and clean__27__ out of the fog ahead. My eyes shone brightly with __28__. He was holding a red balloon. The man walked up right to our car. “I believe this is yours,” he said, __29__ it to me through the open window. Sean laughed.
I held the balloon tightly—and my belief of becoming happy. Maybe it was just another __30__ stranger with a gift; maybe it was an angel. But already it made our future look brighter.
16. A. Friends B. Toys C. Presents D. Dreams
17. A. strength B. feeling C. energy D. hope
18. A. went away B. passed by C. reached out D. drew back
19. A. tall B. big C. thin D. great
20. A. quietly B. slightly C. gently D. tightly
21. A. treasures B. experiences C. hardships D. lessons
22. A. song B. knock C. movement D. sound
23. A. cheered B. cried C. fought D. glared
24. A. lost B. caught C. found D. forgotten
25. A. sitting B. lying C. walking D. speeding
26. A. rich B. happy C. regular D. healthy
27. A. ran B. fell C. appeared D. jumped
28. A. surprise B. happiness C. anger D. disappointment
29. A. throwing B. showing C. handing D. leaving
30. A. outgoing B. lucky C. handsome D. kind
CDCBD ADBDA BCACD
I’m sure many of you have seen Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Multiplicity, or many of the other movies that describe cloning. Most of what you see in these movies is false. What you don’t know is that cloning could be dangerous, to the clone and to our society as a whole. I think human cloning is wrong mainly for four reasons.
What about identity? Humans are promised the right to their own personalities. What would happen if we ignore those rights by giving them someone else’s genetic identity? True, Cloning may prevent people from possessing their identities.
Also, these is a large power struggle here. Cloning means a degree of power and controls over another person’s physical identity and that ignores their rights and their only personalities. The person doing the cloning would have more power than any parent would have.
Cloning would also deal with killing embryos (胚胎). You might not have known, but Dolly, the sheep that was cloned in 1996, was one of over 200 sheep embryos and hers was the only embryo that survived. The rest died or were thrown away. Imagine if the failure rate was that high when we started to clone humans. cloning means running the risk of wasting too much effort
Cloning someone, at this present time, would be extremely dangerous to the birth mother and the clone. In studies done on cows, 4 out of 12 birth mothers died. There is a very high failure rate, which is shown in the cloning of Dolly. Even if you had a few good embryos, failures have been noticeable in animal tests.
So, should we work ahead in the world of cloning? I say no. the risks are greater than the benefits. It’s dangerous to the clone and to the birth mother. We would be killing human lives in the process. It would also be a violation(侵害) of the clone’s right to its own genetic identity and personality.
【小题1】The author thinks human cloning is wrong mainly for ______ reasons.
| A.4 | B.3 | C. 2 | D.5 |
| A.Cloning itself gives parents great power over identity. |
| B.People’s identity is completely determined by their genes. |
| C.Government has the rights to confirm people’s identities. |
| D.Cloning may prevent people from possessing their identities. |
| A.human cloning is much more difficult than animal cloning |
| B.there are 200 sheep successfully cloned. |
| C.cloning means running the risk of wasting too much effort |
| D.numbers of baby animals are likely to be created by cloning |
| A.To introduce the topic of the article. |
| B.To present his idea about the movies. |
| C.To state the conclusion first. |
| D.To make the article unusual. |
| A.What Is Human Cloning |
| B.Human Cloning Is Wrong |
| C.How Does Human Cloning Happen |
| D.Discussion On Human Cloning |
The city can seem a cold, mean place. In the middle of so many people hurrying about their own business, a person can feel alone among the millions of others.
There is a popular view that in cities, strangers are less likely to help an elderly person cross a street or call the police when they see a bike being stolen. Recently, a New Yorker named Casey Neistat did an experiment. He chained up his bike in several public places, then "stole" it in a number of obvious ways, such as using a hacksaw (钢锯). He filmed everything to see whether other New Yorkers would try to stop a shameless bike theft. The result? People just walked on by.
Is this evidence of an immoral, selfish urban society? Not necessarily. According to another recent study, the way city people mind their own business is about other factors besides morality (道德).
This is called the Bystander Effect, the theory that city people do not react because of the urban enviromnent they live in.
Psychologist Dr. Harold explained why people did not involve themselves in Neistat's bike theft experiment with the Bystander Effect.
First, people who live in cities are surrounded by so much activity that they stop noticing what is going on around them. Second, they are less easy to surprise and assume every activity has a logical explanation.
"The third is that people notice it, but they don't know what to do," he continued. "And the fourth is fear — they know they should do something, but they're afraid to challenge someone with a hacksaw."
A lack of concern is only a small reason why people don't take action, concludes Dr. Harold.
Despite the results of Neistat's experiment, there is also evidence of a sense of team spirit that connects people in cities. All it takes is a funny joke or a shared interest to start a conversation with someone at a bus stop. When city folk are in trouble, they come together for support — famously in New York on September 11, 2001.
City society is different, but that doesn't mean it's cold or mean — it just means it's busy!
【小题1】Casey Neistat fihned everything in the experiment with the purpose of .
| A.proving that he was not the thief |
| B.telling people that bike theft was immoral |
| C.finding out who had a sense of right and wrong |
| D.making his experiment well-known to the public |
| A.can partly explain a selfish urban society |
| B.is what our society should pay special attention to |
| C.is the only factor that leads to a selfish urban society |
| D.is the root of the Bystander Effect mentioned in the passage |
| A.a reminder of the sad memories |
| B.a way to prove Dr Harold's Bystander effect |
| C.evidence that city life can be really dangerous |
| D.an example to show team spirit connecting city people |
| A.criticizes the loss of morality in urban society |
| B.feels sad about the result of Neistat's experiment |
| C.thinks city people are too busy to care about others |
| D.disagrees that city life sometimes can be cold and mean |