题目内容

阅读理解

阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项中选出最佳选项。

  People who studied plants have found out that plants carry a small electrical charge(电荷). It is possible to measure this charge with a small piece of equipment called“galvanometer”. The galvanometer is placed on a leaf of the plant, and it records any changes in the electrical field of the leaf. Humans have a similar field which can change when we are shocked or frightened.

  A man called Backster used a galvanometer for his studies of plants and was very surprised at his results. He found that if he had two or more plants in a room and he began to destroy one of them--perhaps by pulling off its leaves or by pulling it out of its pot--then the galvanometer on the leaves of the other plants showed a change in the electrical field. It seemed as if the plants were signaling a feeling of shock. This happened not only when Backster started to destroy plants, but also when he destroyed other living things such as insects.

  Backster said that the plants also knew if someone had destroyed a living thing some distance away, because they signaled when a man who had just cut down a tree entered the room.

  Another scientist, named Sauvin, achieved similar results to Backster's. He kept galvanometers fixes to his plants all the time and checked regularly to see what the plants were doing. If he was out of the office, he telephoned to find about the signals the plants were sending. In this way, he found that the plants were sending out signals at the exact times when they felt strong, pleasure or pain. In fact, Sauvin could cause a change in the eletrical field of his plants over a distance of a few miles simply by thinking about them.

1.What was Backster's discovery?

[  ]

A.Plants carry galvanometer.

B.It is possible to measure a small electrical charge with a small piece of equipment called“galvanometer”.

C.The small electrical charge on the leaves of the other plant can change if he destroyed the leaves on one of two plants.

D.Humans have a similar field which can change when we are shocked or frightened as plants.

2.Backster was surprised at the results of his studies because _____.

[  ]

A.he destroyed an insect

B.he destroyed a plant by pulling off its leaves

C.he found that plants seemed to express feelings of shock

D.he found that plants could move and speak after all

3.The plants sent out signals _____.

[  ]

A.only when Backster started to destroy plants

B.only when Backster destroyed plants or other living things

C.only when he destroyed things such as insects

D.only when Backster placed the galvanometer on the leaves of the plants

4.The scientist called Sauvin _____.

[  ]

A.did not agree with Backster's ideas

B.did not get any results about the electrical charge

C.got different results from Backster's

D.found out some of the same things that Backster did

5.Which of the following is true according to the passage?

[  ]

A.The electrical charge plants carry may shock or frighten us.

B.A tree will signal when it has been cut down.

C.Sauvin could only make his plants receive nearby signals.

D.Plants have feelings because they can receive signals without moving.

答案:C;C;B;D;D
解析:

1C 细节题。通过短文第二段He found that if he had two or more plants in a room and he began to destroy one of them--perhaps by pulling off its leaves or by pulling it out of its pot--then the galvanometer on the leaves of the other plants showed a change in the electrical field.得此答案。在此AC均有一定干扰性。AC均是人们先于Backster的发现和判断,Baekster是在此基础上对galvanometer有了新的发现。

2C 这是Backster做完试验得出的结论。这种结果是他实验前所不知道的。

3B 细节题。从This happened not only when Backster started to destroy plants, but also when he destroyed other living things such as insects.得此答案。

4D 判断归纳题。通过短文最后一段我们可以的看出,SauvinBackster的发现又推进了一步。即在原Backster的发现的基础上,他发现当植物感受到强烈兴奋或疼痛的时候,它们在同一时间发出信号,甚至仅仅by thinking about them, Sauvin就可以在几英里的地方改变植物的electrical field

5D 细节题。从短文第一段得此答案。在此B有较大的干扰性,根据短文,在树被砍倒以后,如果砍树的人走进一个有植物的房间,这棵植物就会发生信号,因此B不合题意。


练习册系列答案
相关题目

第三部分  阅读理解(共15小题;每小题2分,满分30分)

请认真阅读下列短文,从短文后各题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中,选出最佳选项,并在答题卡上将该项涂黑。

                                   A

Scars of Love

Some years ago on a hot summer day in south Florida a little boy decided to go for a swim in the old swimming hole behind his house. In a hurry to dive into the cool water, he ran out of the back door, leaving behind shoes, socks and shirt as he went.

He flew into the water, not realizing that as he swam toward the middle of the lake, an alligator(短吻鳄) was getting close. The mother in the house was looking out of the window and saw the two as they got closer and closer together. In great fear, she ran toward the water, yelling to her son as loudly as she could. Hearing her voice, the little boy became alarmed and made a U-turn to swim to his mother. It was too late. Just as he reached her, the alligator reached him. From the dock, the mother grabbed her little boy by the arms just as the alligator snatched (抓住) his legs. That began an unbelievable tug-of-war (拔河比赛) between the two. The alligator was much stronger than the mother, but the mother was much too passionate to let go. A farmer happened to drive by, heard their screams, rushed from his truck, took aim and shot the alligator.

Remarkably, after weeks and weeks in the hospital, the little boy survived. His legs were extremely scarred (留下伤疤) by the terrible attack of the animal. And on his arms, were deep scratches where his mother’s fingernails dug into his flesh in her effort to hang on to the son she loved.

The newspaper reporter, who interviewed the boy after the trauma (外伤), asked if he would show him his scars. The boy lifted the pant legs. And then, with obvious pride, he said to the reporter, “Look at my arms. I have great scars on my arms, too. I have them because my mum wouldn’t let go.”

You and I can identify with (认同) that little boy. We have scars, too. Not from an alligator, but the scars of a painful past. Some of those scars are unsightly and have caused us deep regret. But, some wounds, my friends, are because we have refused to let go.

56. The underlined part “the two” in the second paragraph refers to ______.

   A. the alligator and the mother         B. the mother and the son

C. the driver and the alligator          D. the son and the alligator

57. From the passage we can infer ________.

   A. The mother was unwilling to let the alligator go

   B. The mother was actually stronger than the alligator

   C. The son was proud of his scars on his arms

   D. The son was ashamed of his scars on his legs

58. According to the last paragraph, what is the writer’s real meaning?

   A. To forget the past is to betray.       B. We should forget the scars.

   C. Wounds are different from scars.     D. We should learn to let go sometimes.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网