题目内容

【题目】Lily went to London with her parents for a two-week vacation. She sent postcards to her friends.

1Which of the following places may Lily have NOT visited yet?

A. The London Eye. B. The Tower of Bridge.

C. Buckingham Palace. D. The River Thames.

2Which of the following statements is WRONG?

A. They took the subway to many places in London.

B. They tasted different types of food in London.

C. They spent more than two months in London.

D. They bought a lot of things in London.

3Lily thinks London is ________.

A. beautiful but unfriendly B. amazing and busy

C. unfriendly and dirty D. busy but polluted

【答案】

1A

2C

3B

【解析】

这是一篇应用文阅读。文章主要讲了lily和她的父母去伦敦度假两周。她给朋友们寄了明信片。

1细节理解题。答案定位在lilyLei Fang的明信片中Today we went to visit Buckingham Palace and the Tower of Bridge.(今天我们去参观了白金汉宫和塔桥。)以及lilyWang Lin的明信片中The River Thames runs in the middle of the city.(泰晤士河流经城市的中心。)文章中没有提到伦敦眼,由此可知Lily可能还没去The London Eye,故选A。

2细节理解题。答案定位在第一段Lily went to London with her parents for a two-week vacation.Lily和她的父母去伦敦度假两周。)由此可知“他们在伦敦呆了两个多月”的表述是错误的,故选C。

3细节理解题。答案定位在lilyLei Fang的明信片中London is a busy city以及lilyTan Xiao的明信片中This is an amazing city,可知lily认为伦敦是令人吃惊的和繁忙的,故选B

细节理解题的解题思路:

细节理解题就是我们常见的wh-题,它们大多是根据文章中的具体信息如事实、例证、原因、过程、论述等进行提问的。抓住文段中的事实和细节是做好该题型的关键,也是做好其它类型问题的基础。该题型几乎都可以在文章中直接找到与答案有关的信息,或是其变体。在一篇短文里大部分篇幅都属于这类围绕主体展开的细节,做这类题一般采用寻读法,即先读题,然后带着问题快速阅读短文,找出与问题和选项有关的词语或句子,再对相关部分进行分析对比,找出答案。例如小题2,根据第一段Lily went to London with her parents for a two-week vacation.Lily和她的父母去伦敦度假两周。)由此可知“他们在伦敦呆了两个多月”的表述是错误的,故选C。

练习册系列答案
相关题目

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网