题目内容
— I'm afraid no one would like to ____ the challenge
— It's just too difficult a task.
B. put on
C. take on
D. work on
Should ecigarettes (electronic cigarettes) be a new choice for the smokers trying to get rid of the habit? Reactions from Americans are mixed.More than half of the people questioned in a survey think ecigarettes should be controlled by the US Food and Drug Administration,but 47 percent believe the ecigarettes should be available to the smokers who want to quit.
“In the hunt for a safer cigarette,ecigarettes are becoming a popular choice among those either trying to quit or looking to replace standard tobacco smoke with an alternative that manufacturers claim to be safer,” Zogby International,which conducted the survey,said in a statement.
About half of the 4,611 adults who took part in the survey had heard about ecigarettes,which are batterypowered,or rechargeable cigarettes that vaporize a liquid nicotine solution.They do not produce smoke but a water vapor without smell.Sold mostly on the Internet,ecigarettes were first made in China.
Last year the World Health Organization (WHO) warned against using ecigarettes,saying there was no evidence to prove they were safe or helped smokers break the habit.The WHO said people who smoke ecigarettes breathe in a fine fog of nicotine into the lungs.
Nearly a third of people questioned in the survey think that ecigarettes should be allowed in places where smoking is forbidden,because they don’t produce smoke,but 46 percent disagree.Men who were aware of the availability of ecigarettes were more likely than women to say they should be a choice available to smokers who want to quit.Young people,aged 18-29,and singles were the groups most open to trying ecigarettes.Smoking is the single largest cause of preventable death worldwide,according to the WHO.
【小题1】What can we learn from Paragraph 1?
| A.American smokers ought to try ecigarettes. |
| B.Americans have different opinions about ecigarettes. |
| C.Every kind of cigarettes should be forbidden in America. |
| D.Most of the Americans don’t like ecigarettes. |
| A.are much safer than common cigarettes |
| B.are popular among people who want to quit smoking |
| C.will take the place of traditional cigarettes |
| D.are produced in a safer way by manufacturers |
| A.Most Americans are familiar with them. |
| B.They are a good choice as there is no nicotine. |
| C.They produce a water vapor that can’t be seen. |
| D.Most people buy them on the Internet. |
| A.Negative | B.Supportive | C.Doubtful | D.Indifferent |
When I first got an email account ten years ago, I received communications only from family, friends, and colleagues. Now it seems that every time I check my e-mail, I have an endless series of advertisement and other correspondence that do not interest the at all. If we want e-mail to continue to be useful, we need special laws that make spamming(发送垃圾邮件) a crime.
If lawmakers do not do something soon to prohibit spam, the problem will certainly get much worse. Computer programs allow spammers to spend hundreds of millions of e-mails almost instantly. As more and more advertisers turn to spam to sell their products, individual e-mail boxes are often flooded with spam e-mails. Would people continue to use e-mail if they had to deal with an annoying amount of spam each time?
This problem is troubling for individuals and companies as well. Many spam emails contain computer viruses that can shut down the entire network of a company. Companies rely on e-mail on for their employees to communicate with each other. Spam frequently causes failures in their local communications networks, and their employees are thus unable to communicate effectively. Such a situation results in a loss of productivity and requires companies to repeatedly repair their networks. These computer problems raise production costs of companies, which are, in the end, passed on to the consumer.
For these reasons, I believe that lawmakers need to legislate (立法) against spam. Spammers should be fined, and perhaps sent to prison if they continue to disturb people. E-mail is a tool which helps people all over the world to communicate conveniently, but spam is destroying this convenience.
【小题1】What does the underlined word “correspondence” in the Paragraph 1 probably mean?
| A.messages | B.ideas | C.connections | D.programs |
| A.Companies rely on e-mail for communications. |
| B.More people in the world communicate by e-mail. |
| C.Many computer viruses contain spam e-mail. |
| D.More advertisers begin to promote sales through spam. |
| A.The business | B.The advertiser |
| C.The employee | D.The consumer |
| A.To inform | B.To educate | C.To persuade | D.To instruct |
When I first got an email account ten years ago, I received communications only from family, friends, and colleagues. Now it seems that every time I check my e-mail, I have an endless series of advertisement and other correspondence that do not interest the at all. If we want e-mail to continue to be useful, we need special laws that make spamming(发送垃圾邮件) a crime.
If lawmakers do not do something soon to prohibit spam, the problem will certainly get much worse. Computer programs allow spammers to spend hundreds of millions of e-mails almost instantly. As more and more advertisers turn to spam to sell their products, individual e-mail boxes are often flooded with spam e-mails. Would people continue to use e-mail if they had to deal with an annoying amount of spam each time?
This problem is troubling for individuals and companies as well. Many spam emails contain computer viruses that can shut down the entire network of a company. Companies rely on e-mail on for their employees to communicate with each other. Spam frequently causes failures in their local communications networks, and their employees are thus unable to communicate effectively. Such a situation results in a loss of productivity and requires companies to repeatedly repair their networks. These computer problems raise production costs of companies, which are, in the end, passed on to the consumer.
For these reasons, I believe that lawmakers need to legislate (立法) against spam. Spammers should be fined, and perhaps sent to prison if they continue to disturb people. E-mail is a tool which helps people all over the world to communicate conveniently, but spam is destroying this convenience.
1.What does the underlined word “correspondence” in the Paragraph 1 probably mean?
|
A.messages |
B.ideas |
C.connections |
D.programs |
2.According to the text, what is the major cause of the flooding spam?
|
A.Companies rely on e-mail for communications. |
|
B.More people in the world communicate by e-mail. |
|
C.Many computer viruses contain spam e-mail. |
|
D.More advertisers begin to promote sales through spam. |
3.According to Paragraph 3,who is the final victim of spam?
|
A.The business |
B.The advertiser |
|
C.The employee |
D.The consumer |
4.What is the purpose of the text?
|
A.To inform |
B.To educate |
C.To persuade |
D.To instruct |
Do you know of anyone who uses the truth to deceive (欺骗)? When someone tells you something that is true, but leaves out important in formation that should be included, he can give you a false picture.
For example, some might say, “I just won a hundred dollars on the lottery (彩票). It was great. I took that dollar ticket back to the store and turned it in for on e hundred dollars!”
This guy’s a winner, right? Maybe, maybe not. We then discover that he bought $200 worth of tickets, and only on e was a winner. He’s really a big loser!
He didn’t say anything that was false, but he left out important information on purpose. That’s called a half-truth. Half-truths are not technically lies, but they are just as dishonest.
Some politicians often use this trick. Let’s say that during Governor Smith’s last term, her state lost one million jobs and gained three million jobs. Then she seeks another term. One of her opponents(对手) says, “During Governor Smith’s term, the state lost one million jobs!” that’s true. However, and honest statement would have been, “During Governor Smith’s term, the state had a net gain of two million jobs.”
Advertisers(广告商) will sometimes use half-truths. It’s against the law to make false statements so they try to mislead you with the truth. An advertisement might say, “Nine out of ten doctors advised their patients to take Yucky Pills to cure toothache.” It fails to mention that they only asked ten doctors and nine of them work for the Yucky Company.
This kind of deception happens too of often. It’s a sad fact of life: Lies are lies, and sometimes the truth can lie as well.
1.How much did the lottery winner lose?
|
A.One hundred dollars. |
B.Two hundred dollars. |
|
C.Three hundred dollars. |
D.Four hundred dollars. |
2.We may infer that the author believes people should _______.
|
A.buy lottery tickets |
B.make use of half-truths |
|
C.not take anything at face value |
D.not trust the Yucky Company |
3. What do the underline words “net gain” in Paragraph 5 mean?
|
A.final increase |
B.big advantage |
|
C.large share |
D.total saving |
4.What can we know from the example of the Yucky Pill advertisement?
|
A.False statements are easy to see through. |
|
B.Half-truths are often used to mislead people. |
|
C.Doctors like to act in advertisements. |
|
D.Advertisements are based on facts. |