题目内容
The Russian rocket designer has died. For many years, he ______ as an important assistant to the father of Soviet space program.
|
A.serves |
B.was serving |
C.served |
D.has served |
C
【解析】
试题分析:考查时态。本题使用一般过去时,描述过去所发生的动作,本句中没有反应出对现在的影响也没有延续到现在,故不要使用现在完成时。句意:俄罗斯的火箭设计师去世了。很多年来,他都充当俄罗斯的太空计划之父的角色。故C正确。
考点:考查时态
点评:现在完成时表示过去发生的事情对现在的影响,或者表示过去发生的事情持续到现在。而一般过去时则是描述过去所发生的事情。
Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs (金砖四国)? If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker-BIC. An argument is being made that Goldman Sach’s famous marketing device(策略),the BRICs, should really be the BICs.
“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?” asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreigh Policy. Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of “The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses. He writes:
“The country’s economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group. I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season. For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy. Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas. ”
Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side. The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent. There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing
far better than Russia.
But the BRICs are not just about economy. As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors to focus on the big promising players. From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs. Its stock(股票)market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three.
At very least, however, Russia’s economic underperformance and stock market outperfoumance does suggest it is indeed one of the group.
【小题1】According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
| A.China. | B.Russia. | C.Brazil. | D.India. |
| A.Russia’s economic performance is far worse than the other three |
| B.Russia’s leaders are not good at managing economy |
| C.Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy |
| D.Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries |
| A.Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government |
| B.Russia outperfoumed the other three countries in stock market |
| C.most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs |
| D.the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later |
| A.suggest it’s time to kick Russia out of the BRICs? |
| B.feel worried about the economy of the BRICs |
| C.think Russia is worth being one of the group |
| D.show disappointment to Russia’s economy |
Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs (金砖四国)? If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker-BIC. An argument is being made that Goldman Sach’s famous marketing device(策略),the BRICs, should really be the BICs.
“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?” asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreigh Policy. Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of “The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses. He writes:
“The country’s economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group. I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season. For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy. Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas. ”
Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side. The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent. There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing
far better than Russia.
But the BRICs are not just about economy. As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors to focus on the big promising players. From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs. Its stock(股票)market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three.
At very least, however, Russia’s economic underperformance and stock market outperfoumance does suggest it is indeed one of the group.
1.According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
|
A.China. |
B.Russia. |
C.Brazil. |
D.India. |
2.According to Aslund, Russia shouldn’t be a BRIC partly because_______.
|
A.Russia’s economic performance is far worse than the other three |
|
B.Russia’s leaders are not good at managing economy |
|
C.Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy |
|
D.Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries |
3.From the passage we know that ________.
|
A.Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government |
|
B.Russia outperfoumed the other three countries in stock market |
|
C.most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs |
|
D.the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later |
4.The author seems to ________.
|
A.suggest it’s time to kick Russia out of the BRICs? |
|
B.feel worried about the economy of the BRICs |
|
C.think Russia is worth being one of the group |
|
D.show disappointment to Russia’s economy |