摘要:The lecture is about the education of America.

网址:http://m.1010jiajiao.com/timu3_id_3166556[举报]

Picture a typical MBA lecture theatre twenty years ago. In it the majority of students will have conformed to (符合) the standard model of the time: male, middle class and Western. Walk into a class today, however, and you’ll get a completely different impression. For a start, you will now see plenty more women—the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, for example, boasts that 40% of its new enrolment is female. You will also see a wide range of ethnic groups and nationals of practically every country.
It might be tempting, therefore, to think that the old barriers have been broken down and equal opportunity achieved. But, increasingly, this apparent diversity (多样化) is becoming a mask for a new type of conformity. Behind the differences in sex, skin tones and mother tongues, there are common attitudes, expectations and ambitions which risk creating a set of clones among the business leaders of the future.
Diversity, it seems, has not helped to address fundamental weaknesses in business leadership. So what can be done to create more effective managers of the commercial world? According to Valerie Gauthier, associate dean at HEC Paris, the key lies in the process by which MBA programmes recruit (招聘) their students. At the moment candidates are selected on a fairly narrow set of criteria such as prior (以前的) academic and career performance, and analytical and problem solving abilities. This is then coupled to a school’s picture of what a diverse class should look like, with the result that passport, ethnic origin and sex can all become influencing factors. But schools rarely dig down to find out what really makes an applicant succeed, to create a class which also contains diversity of attitude and approach—arguably the only diversity that, in a business context, really matters.
Professor Gauthier believes schools should not just be selecting candidates from traditional sectors such as banking, consultancy and industry. They should also be seeking individuals who have backgrounds in areas such as political science, the creative arts, history or philosophy, which will allow them to put business decisions into a wider context.
Indeed, there does seem to be a demand for the more rounded leaders such diversity might create. A study by Mannaz, a leadership development company, suggests that, while the bully-boy chief executive of old may not have been eradicated (根除) completely, there is a definite shift in emphasis towards less tough styles of management—at least in America and Europe. Perhaps most significant, according to Mannaz, is the increasing interest large companies have in more collaborative (合作的) management models, such as those prevalent (流行的) in Scandinavia, which seek to integrate the hard and soft aspects of leadership and encourage delegated responsibility and accountability

  1. 1.

    What characterizes the business school student population of today?

    1. A.
      Greater diversity
    2. B.
      Exceptional diligence
    3. C.
      Intellectual maturity
    4. D.
      Higher ambition
  2. 2.

    What is the author’s concern about current business school education?

    1. A.
      It will arouse students’ unrealistic expectations
    2. B.
      It will produce business leaders of a uniform style
    3. C.
      It focuses on theory rather than on practical skills
    4. D.
      It stresses competition rather than cooperation
  3. 3.

    What aspect of diversity does Valerie Gauthier think is most important?

    1. A.
      Age and educational background
    2. B.
      Attitude and approach to business
    3. C.
      Social and professional experience
    4. D.
      Ethnic origin and gender
  4. 4.

    What does Mannaz say about the current management style?

    1. A.
      It is eradicating the tough aspects of management
    2. B.
      It encourages male and female executives to work side by side
    3. C.
      It adopts the bully-boy chief executive model
    4. D.
      It is shifting towards more collaborative models
查看习题详情和答案>>

阅读理解

  “We’re all sad, and we’re a little worried…We’re sad about something missing in childhood,”psychologist Michael Thompson told 900 early childhood educators from 22 states packed into a lecture hall last week.“We have to fight back,”he declared.“We’re going to fight for play.”

  It is estimated that since the 1980s the average American children have 8 to 12 fewer hours of free play time per week.Some of the factors behind the decline have been there for decades, others are more recent.Among the key factors are:

  ●Parents are unwilling to let their kids play outside on their own, for fear of injury or other accidents, and organized sports and other structured activities take up a large part of a child’s non-school hours.

  ●More hours per week are spent by kids watching TV, playing video games, using the Internet, and communicating on cell phones.

  ●More importance is attached to formal learning in preschool, more homework for primary school students and more pressure from parents on young children to quickly acquire academic skills.

  “Parents are more self-conscious and competitive than in the past,”Thompson said.“They’re pushing their kids to do better than others…Free play loses out.”But he points out that this option doesn’t necessarily breed(培养)creativity and can lead to burnout for good young athletes and frustration for the less skilled.He is also concerned that preschools, in the drive to prepare students for the academic challenges ahead, are reducing the opportunity for group fantasy play-and thus reducing children’s chances to learn on their own about fairness, kindness and other social interactions(交往).

  The consequences are potentially awful, according to Thompson, who points out that reduced time to play freely with other children is producing a generation of unsociable young people and is a factor behind high rates of weight problems, anxiety, and depression among youth.“Without enough opportunity for forms of play that promote creative thinking,”he says,“America’s children will be at a disadvantage in the global economy.”

(1)

Which of the following is TRUE?

[  ]

A.

American kids have about 8 to 12 hours of free play time each week.

B.

American parents don’t allow their children to do a lot of sports.

C.

Many preschools are paying more attention to formal learning.

D.

American children spend less time watching TV.

(2)

Children’s free play time has been reduced for the following reasons EXCEPT ________.

[  ]

A.

parents are concerned about their children’s safety

B.

parents have higher academic expectations on their children

C.

children spend more time on other activities instead of free play

D.

some education experts give parents improper advice

(3)

What is the most important thing that children get by playing freely?

[  ]

A.

Knowledge about the rules of some sports.

B.

Skills in playing computer games.

C.

Motivation to do better than others.

D.

Opportunities to promote creative thinking.

(4)

According to Thompson, American children will be more ________ as a result of reduced play time.

[  ]

A.

competitive

B.

depressed

C.

hard-working

D.

sociable

查看习题详情和答案>>

阅读理解

  “We’re all sad, and we’re a little worried…We’re sad about something missing in childhood,” psychologist Michael Thompson told 900 early childhood educators from 22 states packed into a lecture hall last week.“We have to fight back,” he declared.“We’re going to fight for play.”

  It is estimated that since the 1980s the average American children have 8 to 12 fewer hours of free play time per week.Some of the factors behind the decline have been there for decades, others are more recent.Among the key factors are:

  ● Parents are unwilling to let their kids play outside on their own, for fear of injury or other accidents, and organized sports and other structured activities take up a large part of a child’s non-school hours.

  ● More hours per week are spent by kids watching TV, playing video games, using the Internet, and communicating on cell phones.

  ● More importance is attached to formal learning in preschool, more homework for primary school students and more pressure from parents on young children to quickly acquire academic skills.

  “Parents are more self-conscious and competitive than in the past,” Thompson said.“They’re pushing their kids to do better than others...Free play loses out.” But he points out that this option doesn’t necessarily breed(培养)creativity and can lead to burnout for good young athletes and frustration for the less skilled.He is also concerned that preschools, in the drive to prepare students for the academic challenges ahead, are reducing the opportunity for group fantasy play-and thus reducing children’s chances to learn on their own about fairness, kindness and other social interactions(交往).

  The consequences are potentially awful, according to Thompson, who points out that reduced time to play freely with other children is producing a generation of unsociable young people and is a factor behind high rates of weight problems, anxiety, and depression among youth.“Without enough opportunity for forms of play that promote creative thinking,” he says, “America’s children will be at a disadvantage in the global economy.”

(1)

Which of the following is TRUE?

[  ]

A.

American kids have about 8 to 12 hours of free play time each week.

B.

American parents don’t allow their children to do a lot of sports.

C.

Many preschools are paying more attention to formal learning.

D.

American children spend less time watching TV.

(2)

Children’s free play time has been reduced for the following reasons EXCEPT _________.

[  ]

A.

parents are concerned about their children’s safety

B.

parents have higher academic expectations on their children

C.

children spend more time on other activities instead of free play

D.

some education experts give parents improper advice

(3)

What is the most important thing that children get by playing freely?

[  ]

A.

Knowledge about the rules of some sports.

B.

Skills in playing computer games.

C.

Motivation to do better than others.

D.

Opportunities to promote creative thinking.

(4)

According to Thompson, American children will be more _________ as a result of reduced play time.

[  ]

A.

competitive

B.

depressed

C.

hard-working

D.

sociable

查看习题详情和答案>>

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网