题目内容

It is culture more than anything else        determines how a nation’s civilization evolves.


  1. A.
    that
  2. B.
    which
  3. C.
    why
  4. D.
    as
A
试题分析:句意:是文化而不是其他的来决定一个国家的文明进展。这里是强调句型,被强调部分是句子的主语,其结构是:It was+被强调部分+that/who+其他。判断强调句型的方法是把It was that这三个词去掉,整个句子不缺成分,意思完整。
考点:考查强调句型的用法。
点评:本题难度适中。强调句型是高中阶段的重难点之一,也是高考的热点,需要考生有分析理解句子的结构的能力。尤其把强调句型与其他从句混合在一起考查更增加了试题的难度。
即学即练:It is what you do  rather than what you say ____matters. 
A.that  B. what  C.which  D. this
解析:A。这是一个强调主语的强调句型,去掉强调结构,剩下的是Whatyou do rather than what you say matters. 表意完整。
练习册系列答案
相关题目

阅读理解

  A UFO cult said on Saturday the world's second cloned(克隆)baby had been born to a Dutch woman but cloning experts swiftly dismissed the claim as a baseless stunt. (花招)

  “A baby girl was born yesterday evening. The baby is healthy and the mother, too. ”Bart Overvliet, head of the Raelian movement's Dutch branch, told Reuters by telephone.

  The woman was now in the Netherlands with her partner, he said, although he did not know where the birth had actually taken place, or even if it had been in the Netherlands itself.

  The birth resulted from a procedure by Clonaid, the cloning firm that said it had organized the birth of the first human clone, named Eve, to a 31-year-old American on Tuesday, December 26.

  But Harry Griffin, head of Britain's Roslin Institute which cloned the fist adult mammal, Dolly the sheep, in 1996, said the group had provided no proof that two cloned babies existed.

  “There is no mason to believe this is anything other than a long drawn-out publicity stunt, ”he told Reuters.

  Colnaid's claims have led to widespread doubt among mainstream scientific experts and the company has not yet to provide DNA samples or other evidence to support its claim.

  Severino Antinori, an Italian fertility doctor involved in separate human cloning projects, said he thought the report of the record clone's birth was as fake as the first.

  “This news makes me laugh. It's a mystery to me how anybody could believe these people who have no scientific track record. It is an absolute lie. ”He told Reuters.

1.According to the news, the second cloned baby was born ________.

[  ]

A.in America
B.in Britain
C.in Dutch
D.it is not mentioned

2.The two cloned baby were born ________.

[  ]

A.in the same year
B.in two different years
C.on weekend
D.on Tuesday

3.The underlined word“fake”means ________.

[  ]

A.unbelievable
B.believable
C.interesting
D.terrible

4.What is the attitude of other scientists?

[  ]

A.They laugh at the news

B.They think cloning baby is impossible

C.They want some further evidence

D.They regard it as a joke

5.Which of the following is true?

[  ]

A.the cloned baby named Eve was healthy

B.The cloned sheep was born in Britain

C.The cloning firm promised to give proof

D.Bart Overvliet dismissed the claim

Homeownership has let us down. For generations, Americans believed that owning a home was undoubtedly good. Our political leaders hammered home the point. Franklin Roosevelt held that a country of homeowners was “unconquerable.” Homeownership could even save babies, save children, save families and save America. A house with a lawn and a fence wasn’t just a nice place to live in or a risk-free investment; it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.
But the dark side of homeownership is now all too apparent: Indeed, easy lending stimulated(刺激)by the cult of homeownership may have triggered(引起)the financial crisis. Housing remains a drag on the economy. Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.
For the better part of a century, politics, industry and culture lined up to create a fetish of the idea of buying a house. Homeownership has done plenty of good over the decades; it has provided stability to tens of millions of families. Yet by idealizing the act of buying a home, we have ignored the downsides. In the bubble years, lending standards slipped dramatically, allowing many Americans to put far too much of their income into paying for their housing. And we ignored longer-term phenomena too. Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods. It fed America’s overuse of energy and oil. It made it more difficult for those who had lost a job to find another. Perhaps worst of all, it helped us become casually self-deceiving: By telling ourselves that homeownership was a pathway to wealth and stable communities and better test scores, we avoided dealing with these frightening issues head-on.
Now, as the U.S. recovers from the biggest housing bust(破产)since the Great Depression, it is time to rethink how realistic our expectations of homeownership are—and how much money we want to spend chasing them. Many argue that homeownership should not be a goal pursued at all costs.
【小题1】Political leaders wanted to spend money encouraging people to buy houses because______.

A.owning a home was undoubtedly good
B.homeownership could shape a country
C.houses could save families and America
D.homeownership was unconquerable
【小题2】The underlined sentence in Para. 2 means ______.
A.homeownership has quite a lot of bad effects
B.there might be another housing breakdown in the U.S.
C.the existing-home sales will keep decreasing in the U.S.
D.the result of homeownership is much worse than it appears
【小题3】It can be inferred from Para. 3 that ______.
A.Americans choose to live out of urban areas
B.it is the way to wealth to have one’s own house
C.it is hard for Americans to get a home loan
D.homeownership has made many people out of work
【小题4】What is the author’s attitude towards homeownership?
A.Cautious.B.Ambiguous.C.Favorable.D.Optimistic.

McDonald's is the world single biggest food provider with annual sales of around $12.4bn. And the company's symbol Ronald McDonald is now (or so the company claims) the world's most recognized person after Santa Claus.

The first McDonald's restaurant was opened in San Bernardino, California, in 1948 by brothers Mac and Richard “Dick” McDonald. Mac ran the restaurant side; Dick was the marketing genius. He had already invented the drive-in laundry and had been the first person to use neon lights in advertising. Now he spotted the gap in the post-war, baby-boom market for cheap, family-orientated restaurants with simple menus, standardized food and efficient service.

After a slow start, business began to boom. By 1954, the brothers were joined by another entrepreneur, a kitchen equipment salesman called Ray A Kroc who owned the franchise to the Multimixer, milk shake maker used throughout the McDonald's chain. A year later, Kroc had bought the McDonald brothers' chain of 25 franchises for the equivalent of around $70m(£44m). Dick remained with the company until the Seventies, when he and Kroc fell out over Kroc's claim that the chain was his creation.

Today, an almost Stalinist cult of personality surrounds Kroc (who died in 1984) at McDonald's, while the brothers who gave the company its name have all but been written out of its history. But though Kroc did not found McDonald's, he was certainly responsible for the empire-building philosophy which led to its world domination. He ushered in such essential contributions to international cuisine as the Big Mac (1968) and the Egg McMuffin (1973); and helped launch Ronald McDonald —— “in any language he means fun” —— on to television in 1963.

Every three hours, a new McDonald's franchise opens somewhere in the world; it can be found in more than 100 countries including India (vegetarian-only to avoid offending the non-beef-eating populace) and Israel (non kosher, despite fierce local objection). McDonald's chain embodied the thrusting, can-do spirit of Fifties America with staff mottoes such as “If you've got time to lean, you've got time to clean.”

1.McDonald's was founded _____.

A. by a kitchen equipment salesman

B. in California

C. by a marketing genius called Dick McDonald

D. after the first World War

2.What do we know about McDonald's brothers?

A. They were not McDonald's founders although they named the restaurant.

B. Their business was still in depression after several years.

C. They had clear job separation on business.

D. They sold their restaurant to a salesman in 1954.

3.Which is not Kroc's contribution to McDonald's ?

A. He launched the restaurant image Ronald McDonald on to television.

B. Under his lead, international cuisine as the Big Mac and the Egg McMuffin earned worldwide fame

C. He spotted the gap in postwar market for cheap, family-orientated restaurants.

D. He built McDonald's empire with a philosophy which led to its world domination.

4.Which statement is true according to the passage?

A. The single biggest food provider was however, not named after its founder

B. The international cuisine as the Big Mac, a beef hamburger, is provided every chain restaurant in the world.

C. Employees in McDonald's have no time to lean.

D. The symbol Ronald McDonald, means fun in any language, is said to the world most recognized person after Santa Claus.

 

Homeownership has let us down. For generations, Americans believed that owning a home was undoubtedly good. Our political leaders hammered home the point. Franklin Roosevelt held that a country of homeowners was “unconquerable.” Homeownership could even save babies, save children, save families and save America. A house with a lawn and a fence wasn’t just a nice place to live in or a risk-free investment; it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.

But the dark side of homeownership is now all too apparent: Indeed, easy lending stimulated(刺激)by the cult of homeownership may have triggered(引起)the financial crisis. Housing remains a drag on the economy. Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.

For the better part of a century, politics, industry and culture lined up to create a fetish of the idea of buying a house. Homeownership has done plenty of good over the decades; it has provided stability to tens of millions of families. Yet by idealizing the act of buying a home, we have ignored the downsides. In the bubble years, lending standards slipped dramatically, allowing many Americans to put far too much of their income into paying for their housing. And we ignored longer-term phenomena too. Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods. It fed America’s overuse of energy and oil. It made it more difficult for those who had lost a job to find another. Perhaps worst of all, it helped us become casually self-deceiving: By telling ourselves that homeownership was a pathway to wealth and stable communities and better test scores, we avoided dealing with these frightening issues head-on.

Now, as the U.S. recovers from the biggest housing bust(破产)since the Great Depression, it is time to rethink how realistic our expectations of homeownership are—and how much money we want to spend chasing them. Many argue that homeownership should not be a goal pursued at all costs.

1.Political leaders wanted to spend money encouraging people to buy houses because______.

A.owning a home was undoubtedly good

B.homeownership could shape a country

C.houses could save families and America

D.homeownership was unconquerable

2.The underlined sentence in Para. 2 means ______.

A.homeownership has quite a lot of bad effects

B.there might be another housing breakdown in the U.S.

C.the existing-home sales will keep decreasing in the U.S.

D.the result of homeownership is much worse than it appears

3.It can be inferred from Para. 3 that ______.

A.Americans choose to live out of urban areas

B.it is the way to wealth to have one’s own house

C.it is hard for Americans to get a home loan

D.homeownership has made many people out of work

4.What is the author’s attitude towards homeownership?

A.Cautious.          B.Ambiguous.        C.Favorable.         D.Optimistic.

 

Homeownership has let us down. For generations, Americans believed that owning a home was undoubtedly good. Our political leaders hammered home the point. Franklin Roosevelt held that a country of homeowners was “unconquerable.” Homeownership could even save babies, save children, save families and save America. A house with a lawn and a fence wasn’t just a nice place to live in or a risk-free investment; it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.
But the dark side of homeownership is now all too apparent: Indeed, easy lending stimulated(刺激)by the cult of homeownership may have triggered(引起)the financial crisis. Housing remains a drag on the economy. Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.
For the better part of a century, politics, industry and culture lined up to create a fetish of the idea of buying a house. Homeownership has done plenty of good over the decades; it has provided stability to tens of millions of families. Yet by idealizing the act of buying a home, we have ignored the downsides. In the bubble years, lending standards slipped dramatically, allowing many Americans to put far too much of their income into paying for their housing. And we ignored longer-term phenomena too. Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods. It fed America’s overuse of energy and oil. It made it more difficult for those who had lost a job to find another. Perhaps worst of all, it helped us become casually self-deceiving: By telling ourselves that homeownership was a pathway to wealth and stable communities and better test scores, we avoided dealing with these frightening issues head-on.
Now, as the U.S. recovers from the biggest housing bust(破产)since the Great Depression, it is time to rethink how realistic our expectations of homeownership are—and how much money we want to spend chasing them. Many argue that homeownership should not be a goal pursued at all costs

  1. 1.

    Political leaders wanted to spend money encouraging people to buy houses because______

    1. A.
      owning a home was undoubtedly good
    2. B.
      homeownership could shape a country
    3. C.
      houses could save families and America
    4. D.
      homeownership was unconquerable
  2. 2.

    The underlined sentence in Para. 2 means ______

    1. A.
      homeownership has quite a lot of bad effects
    2. B.
      there might be another housing breakdown in the U.S
    3. C.
      the existing-home sales will keep decreasing in the U.S
    4. D.
      the result of homeownership is much worse than it appears
  3. 3.

    It can be inferred from Para. 3 that ______

    1. A.
      Americans choose to live out of urban areas
    2. B.
      it is the way to wealth to have one’s own house
    3. C.
      it is hard for Americans to get a home loan
    4. D.
      homeownership has made many people out of work
  4. 4.

    What is the author’s attitude towards homeownership?

    1. A.
      Cautious
    2. B.
      Ambiguous
    3. C.
      Favorable
    4. D.
      Optimistic

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网