题目内容
Homeownership has let us down. For generations, Americans believed that owning a home was undoubtedly good. Our political leaders hammered home the point. Franklin Roosevelt held that a country of homeowners was “unconquerable.” Homeownership could even save babies, save children, save families and save America. A house with a lawn and a fence wasn’t just a nice place to live in or a risk-free investment; it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.
But the dark side of homeownership is now all too apparent: Indeed, easy lending stimulated(刺激)by the cult of homeownership may have triggered(引起)the financial crisis. Housing remains a drag on the economy. Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.
For the better part of a century, politics, industry and culture lined up to create a fetish of the idea of buying a house. Homeownership has done plenty of good over the decades; it has provided stability to tens of millions of families. Yet by idealizing the act of buying a home, we have ignored the downsides. In the bubble years, lending standards slipped dramatically, allowing many Americans to put far too much of their income into paying for their housing. And we ignored longer-term phenomena too. Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods. It fed America’s overuse of energy and oil. It made it more difficult for those who had lost a job to find another. Perhaps worst of all, it helped us become casually self-deceiving: By telling ourselves that homeownership was a pathway to wealth and stable communities and better test scores, we avoided dealing with these frightening issues head-on.
Now, as the U.S. recovers from the biggest housing bust(破产)since the Great Depression, it is time to rethink how realistic our expectations of homeownership are—and how much money we want to spend chasing them. Many argue that homeownership should not be a goal pursued at all costs.
1.Political leaders wanted to spend money encouraging people to buy houses because______.
A.owning a home was undoubtedly good
B.homeownership could shape a country
C.houses could save families and America
D.homeownership was unconquerable
2.The underlined sentence in Para. 2 means ______.
A.homeownership has quite a lot of bad effects
B.there might be another housing breakdown in the U.S.
C.the existing-home sales will keep decreasing in the U.S.
D.the result of homeownership is much worse than it appears
3.It can be inferred from Para. 3 that ______.
A.Americans choose to live out of urban areas
B.it is the way to wealth to have one’s own house
C.it is hard for Americans to get a home loan
D.homeownership has made many people out of work
4.What is the author’s attitude towards homeownership?
A.Cautious. B.Ambiguous. C.Favorable. D.Optimistic.
63-66 BDAA
1.B
2.D
3.A
4.A
【解析】
试题分析:
1.B 细节题。根据第一段后三行it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.说明homeownership是如此的重要,甚至能够塑造一个国家,故B正确。
2.D 推理题。根据本段后4行Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.说明现在的homeownership已经给社会经济带来了很多负面的影响,引起了经济危机,所引起的问题要比表面上更加严重,故D正确。
3.A 推断题。根据第三段7,8行Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods.说明很多美国人都走出了城市,住到了乡下去。故A说法正确。
4.A 推理题。作者在文章中客观的讲述了homeownership的好处以及给我们的社会带来的不好的地方,使用他对于homeownership的态度是很谨慎小心的。故A说法正确。
考点:考查了经济类短文阅读
点评:本文客观地讲述了homeownership给我们带来的好处与坏处,讲述了homeownership的重要性。本文的难点在于考生对于话题内容的不熟悉,不容易完全理解整个文章。对于推理题的考查较多,在审题的时候要抓住题目的关键所在,结合各选项中的信息词做适当地比对,再从文章上下文的含义出发,做出准确细致的判断。
The United States is the world's largest consumer of energy. We use electricity, gas and oil to light and heat our buildings and run our cars. The demand for power is growing. But we may not need to build new power plants or find more oil. The best way to increase our supply of energy is to be more efficient.
Did you know that when you leave your video-game console (游戏机操纵台) on, it consumes more electricity than two refrigerators? Or that those funny-looking, twisty bulbs (灯泡) use 75% less power than traditional light bulbs? We have the tools to save money, reduce pollution and even help our planet, simply by wasting less energy.
As President, Barack Obama plans to make energy efficiency in American a major goal. He has promised to cut 15% of all energy used by the Federal Government. In a speech, he called for 75% of government office buildings to be updated for better efficiency. He pointed out that energy-efficient buildings and homes will save consumers billions of dollars on energy bills. An “extra benefit”, he added, will be “a cleaner, safer planet.”
Gas, coal and oil are called fossil fuels. Fossil fuels have been the world's main source of energy for hundreds of years. But burning them releases dirty gases, which cause pollution.
There are two main ways to save energy. The first is to use more efficient machines. Hybrid cars use less gas. New appliances are designed to use less electricity. Today's refrigerators are three times more efficient than those before 1973. Laptop computers consume much less energy than desktop computers.
The second is to use machines more productively. According to the US Department of Energy, in the average home, 75% of the electricity used to power electronic equipment is standby power (备用电源) . That means power flowing to plugged-in appliances whether or not they are being used.
Homeowners can avoid wasting power by pulling the plug on appliances when they are not in use. Efficiency experts argue that today's best techniques could cut US oil and gas use in half, and reduce our electricity use by three-fourths.
【小题1】By referring to Obama's plan, the author mainly intended to say that _______
A.the US government office buildings have wasted the most energy |
B.Obama has decided to take the lead to cut down the use of electricity |
C.it is time for the US to shoulder the responsibility for a cleaner planet |
D.the US is determined to improve energy efficiency in the whole America |
A.to build new power plants or find more oil is no longer useful |
B.burning fossil fuels can lead to a growing demand for power |
C.everyone can make a difference by wasting less energy |
D.most of the electricity is wasted with appliances plugged-in |
A.The world's largest consumer of energy |
B.The world's energy efficiency movement |
C.We need to find new energy |
D.We have to be more energy efficient |
The oldest and most common source(来源) of renewaBle energy known to man, Biomass is one of the most important forms energy production in the United States and elsewhere. Since such a wide variety of Biomass materials is everywhere ---- from trees and grasses to agricultural and city ---- life wastes ----Biomass promises to play a continuing role in providing power and heat for millions of people around the world.
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists(UCS), Biomass is a kind of renewaBle energy source that produces no carBon dioxide(二氧化碳), Because the energy it contains comes from the sun. When plant matter is Burned, it gives off the sun’s energy. In this way, Biomass serves as a sort of natural Battery(电池) for storing the sun’s energy. As long as Biomass is produced continuously ----with only as much grown as is used--- the “Battery” lasts forever.
According to the Energy Information Administration, Biomass has Been one of the leading renewaBle energy sources in the United States for several years running through 2007, making up Between 0.5 and 0.9 percent of the nation’s total electricity supply. In 2008----although the numBers aren’t all in yet----wind power proBaBly took over first place Because of the rapid development of wind farms across the country.
Producing power from Biomass helps reduce some 11 million tons of carBon dioxide each year. Some homeowners also try to make their own heat By using Biomass materials. Such practice may save homeowner’s money, But it also produces a lot of pollution. So, the Best way is to encourage power plants to use it.
【小题1】Why is Biomass considered as “ a sort of natural Battery”?
A.It Burns merely plant matter. | B.It keeps producing electricity. |
C.It stores the energy from the sun. | D.It produces zero carBon dioxide. |
A.Wind power would Be the leader of renewaBle energy. |
B.there was a rapid growth of electricity production |
C.Biomass might Become the main energy source |
D.0.5~0.9 of power supply came from Biomass |
A.To prevent the waste of energy. | B.To increase production safety. |
C.To reduce pollution. | D.To save money. |
A.A research plan. | B.A science magazine |
C.A Book review. | D.A Business report. |
Homeownership has let us down. For generations, Americans believed that owning a home was undoubtedly good. Our political leaders hammered home the point. Franklin Roosevelt held that a country of homeowners was “unconquerable.” Homeownership could even save babies, save children, save families and save America. A house with a lawn and a fence wasn’t just a nice place to live in or a risk-free investment; it was a way to shape a nation. No wonder leaders of all political types wanted to spend more than $100 billion a year on subsidies(补助)and tax breaks to encourage people to buy.
But the dark side of homeownership is now all too apparent: Indeed, easy lending stimulated(刺激)by the cult of homeownership may have triggered(引起)the financial crisis. Housing remains a drag on the economy. Existing-home sales in April dropped 27% from the previous month, worsening fears of a double-dip. And all that is just the obvious tale of a housing bubble and what happened when it popped. The real story is deeper and darker still.
For the better part of a century, politics, industry and culture lined up to create a fetish of the idea of buying a house. Homeownership has done plenty of good over the decades; it has provided stability to tens of millions of families. Yet by idealizing the act of buying a home, we have ignored the downsides. In the bubble years, lending standards slipped dramatically, allowing many Americans to put far too much of their income into paying for their housing. And we ignored longer-term phenomena too. Homeownership contributed to the hollowing out of cities and kept renters out of the best neighborhoods. It fed America’s overuse of energy and oil. It made it more difficult for those who had lost a job to find another. Perhaps worst of all, it helped us become casually self-deceiving: By telling ourselves that homeownership was a pathway to wealth and stable communities and better test scores, we avoided dealing with these frightening issues head-on.
Now, as the U.S. recovers from the biggest housing bust(破产)since the Great Depression, it is time to rethink how realistic our expectations of homeownership are—and how much money we want to spend chasing them. Many argue that homeownership should not be a goal pursued at all costs.
【小题1】Political leaders wanted to spend money encouraging people to buy houses because______.
A.owning a home was undoubtedly good |
B.homeownership could shape a country |
C.houses could save families and America |
D.homeownership was unconquerable |
A.homeownership has quite a lot of bad effects |
B.there might be another housing breakdown in the U.S. |
C.the existing-home sales will keep decreasing in the U.S. |
D.the result of homeownership is much worse than it appears |
A.Americans choose to live out of urban areas |
B.it is the way to wealth to have one’s own house |
C.it is hard for Americans to get a home loan |
D.homeownership has made many people out of work |
A.Cautious. | B.Ambiguous. | C.Favorable. | D.Optimistic. |