We a wonderful party to mark the special occasion in the open air.but it rained heavily then．( )A．could have hadB．must have hadC．have hadD．didn't have 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

题目内容

8．We a wonderful party to mark the special occasion in the open air，but it rained heavily then．（　　）

A．

could have had

B．

must have had

C．

have had

D．

didn't have

分析我们本来可以在户外举办一个精彩的聚会来记住这个特殊的机会，但那时雨下得很大．

解答答案：A 句意表达的是对过去事实的相反假设，要用虚拟；对过去事实的相反假设，要用情态动词加完成时态来构成；must加完成时态表示推测，不能用来构成虚拟．故选A．

点评虚拟语气是表示与事实相反的假设，构成方式有：对现在或将来，条件句中用一般过去时态，主语用情态动词加动词原形；对过去，条件句中用过去完成时态，主语用情态动词加完成时态．学习时，要牢记构成方式．

练习册系列答案

	A．	Not informing		B．	Not being informed
	C．	Not having informed		D．	Not having been informed

1．增加：在缺词处加一个漏字符号（?）．并在其下面写出修改后的词．
删除：把多余的词用斜线（\）划掉．
修改：在错的词后划一横线，并在该词下面写出修改后的词．
注意：1．每处错误及修改均仅限一词；
2．只允许修改10处，多者（从第11处起）不记分．
Dear Ms．Smith，
I appreciate your help very well．On the first day of Camp，you came up to myself while I was sitting alone．After that，you always gave me specially attention and inspire me to join in activities．As the result，I gradually got to know the other campers．Because the help you gave me that summer．My life changed．I gained so much confidence that I returned back to school as a new person．My grades improved．I became very active but made new friends．Today，I got a letter that said I had been admitting to a college．I am proud of it．I just want to thank for helping me becoming a different person．
Yours，
Bob．

16．Doug Nordquist was a high jumper，who trained for years to make the Olympic team．In the 1984Olympics，he jumped his best ever-seven feet，six inches．But he didn't win a gold medal．He came in fifth place．
"I came away from there feeling like a winner，"says Doug Nordquist．
Doug thinks being a winner doesn't mean coming in first．It means doing your personal best．Sometimes he earned gold and silver medals．Sometimes he got fifth place．As long as he has done his best，Doug feels good about himself．Though he wants to take home a gold，silver，or bronze medal，he knows he's always a winner，no matter what happens．
Doug thinks about his other job-teaching high school band-the same way．He believes that"if you put yourself into your work，you can accomplish whatever you want．"One of his students explains，"Mr．Nordquist says，‘think higher and you can reach it．'"
His students have won many awards in Los Angeles and Orange County band competitions．But he reminds them"it's not the awards that are as important as all the things we do to get there．"The students are winners because they've learned to play their instruments and work with one another the best that they can．
【写作内容】
1 以约30个词概括上文的主要内容．
2以约120个词谈谈你对参加比赛是不是为了得金牌的想法，内容包括：
（1）分析文中Doug 的人生态度；
（2）你认为参加比赛是为了拿奖牌吗？
（3）我们应如何培养健康的心态？
【写作要求】
1作文中可以使用亲身经历或虚构的故事，也可以参照阅读材料的内容，但不得直接引用原文中的句子．
2作文中不能出现真实姓名和学校名称．
【评分标准】
概括准确，语言规范，内容合适，语篇连贯．

3．If Rose ____ her diamond in a safer place，it ____ stolen．（　　）

	A．	had put； might not have been
	B．	had put； could be
	C．	had put； might be
	D．	had not put； could not have been

13．I have great news for you．You have been accepted as member of our club．（　　）

20．Things of___kind come together；people of____kind fall into___same group．（　　）

17．Women are still underrepresented in top academic positions．One of the possible explanations for this is the increasing importance of obtaining research funding．Women are often less successful in this than men．Psychology researchers Dr．Romy van der Lee and professor Naomi Ellemers investigated whether this difference also occurs at the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research （NWO） and examined potential explanations．
The researchers were assigned by NWO to carry out this study as part of the broader evaluation of NWO's procedures and its gender diversity policy．The aim was to gain more insight into the causes of the differences in awarding rates for male and female applicants for research funding．The analysis addressed an important"talent programme"of NWO，the Veni grant．"Whoever receives this grant has a greater chance of obtaining an important appointment at a university，"says Naomi Ellemers．
Van der Lee and Ellemers investigated all the applications submitted by male and female researchers over a period of three years：a total of 2823applications．Under the direction of NWO these applications were assessed by scientific committees consisting of men and women．The results demonstrate that the awarding rates for female applicants （14.9%） are systematically lower than those for male applicants （17.7%）．"If we compare the proportion of women among the applicants with the proportion of women among those awarded funding，we see a loss of 4%，"said Ellemers．
The study reveals that women are less positively evaluated for their qualities as researcher than men are．"Interestingly the research proposals of women and men are evaluated equally positively．In other words，the reviewers see no difference in the quality of the proposals that men and women submit，"says Romy van der Lee．
In search for a possible cause for the differences in awarding rates and evaluations，the researchers also investigated the language use in the instructions and forms used to assess the quality of applications．This clearly revealed the occurrence of gendered language．The words that are used to indicate quality are frequently words that were established in previous research as referring mainly to the male gender stereotype （such as challenging and excellent）．Romy van der Lee explains："As a result，it appears that men more easily satisfy the assessment criteria，because these better fit the characteristics stereotypically associated with men．"
In response to the results of this research，NWO will devote more attention to the gender awareness of reviewers in its methods and procedures．It will also be investigated which changes to the assessment procedures and criteria can most strongly contribute to more equal chances for men and women to obtain research funding．This will include an examination of the language used by NWO．NWO chair Jos Engelens said，"The research has yielded valuable results and insights．Based on the recommendations made by the researchers we will therefore focus in the coming period on the development of evidence-based measures to reduce the difference in awarding rates．"

74．Van der Lee and Ellemers carried out the research to find out whetherB．
A．women are less successful than men in top academic positions
B．female applicants are at a disadvantage in getting research funding
C．NOW's procedures and gender diversity policy enhance fair play
D．there are equal chances for men and women to be admitted to a university
75．Van der Lee and Ellemers'study shows thatC．
A．grant receivers were more likely to get appointments at universities
B．men applicants for research funding outnumbered women applicants
C．the research proposals of women are equally treated with those of men
D．the reviewers have narrow，prejudiced conceptions of women candidates
76．What might be the main cause for the differences in awarding rates and evaluations？A
A．The words used in the instructions and forms．
B．The reviewers'preference to applications．
C．The methods and procedures for evaluation．
D．The vague and unclear assessment criteria．
77．What will NWO probably do next in response to the results of this research？D
A．Eliminate possibilities for difference in awarding rates．
B．Design a language examination for all the reviewers．
C．Emphasize the importance of gender awareness．
D．Improve the assessment procedures and criteria．

试题分类