题目内容
【题目】阅读下面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。
On Tuesday evening, Zhong Nanshan, a【1】(lead) respiratory disease expert, was invited to participate in an online live broadcast hosted by Tencent to share his 【2】(late) views on COVID-19.
Chinese medicine【3】(have) some certain effects on the【4】(prevent) and control of COVID-19. For example, Lianhua Qingwen medicine might be a little weaker; against novel coronavirus pneumonia, but it has a good inhibitory effect on damage【5】tissue cell inflammation 【6】 (cause) by the epidemic. And it's proved effective to reduce fever, cough, and speed up【7】(recover). 【8】(consist) of five herbal extracts, Xuebijing, an injection developed and marketed during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in 2003, can relieve symptoms and reduce the rate of fatalities. We can’t judge 【9】 the Chinese medicine or western medicine treatment is effective just based on impressions, 【10】we can prove it according to medical methods.
【答案】
【1】leading
【2】latest
【3】has
【4】prevention
【5】to
【6】caused
【7】recovery
【8】Consisting
【9】whether/ if
【10】but
【解析】
本文是说明文。本文主要讲述了首席呼吸疾病专家钟南山参加在线直播,分析了对Covid-19的一些最新看法。谈论了一些药物对新冠肺炎有疗效。文章介绍了连花清瘟胶囊和血必净两种药物。
【1】
考查形容词。句意:周二晚上,首席呼吸疾病专家钟南山应邀参加了腾讯主持的在线直播,分享了他对Covid-19的最新看法。分析句子可知,lead修饰expert,作定语,leading“主要的;首位的” 是形容词,根据句意,故填leading。
【2】
考查形容词。句意:周二晚上,首席呼吸疾病专家钟南山应邀参加了腾讯主持的在线直播,分享了他对Covid-19的最新看法。根据句意,此处表示“最新的看法”,latest“最新的”,故填latest。
【3】
考查时态和主谓一致。句意:中药对Covid-19的预防和控制有一定的作用。主语Chinese medicine表示特指,是单数,故谓语动词用单数,且根据语境,描述一个客观的事实,用一般现在时,故填 has。
【4】
考查名词。句意同上。冠词修饰名词,作介词宾语,故填prevention。
【5】
考查介词。句意:例如,连花清瘟胶囊可能对新冠状病毒肺炎稍弱,但对因为流行病引起的组织细胞炎症损伤有良好的抑制作用。damage to...“对……破坏”,是常用搭配,故填to。
【6】
考查非谓语动词。句意同上。分析句子可知,cause作定语,与其逻辑主语tissue cell inflammation是被动关系,用过去分词作定语,表示被动,故填caused。
【7】
考查名词。句意:它被证明是有效的,减少发烧,咳嗽,并加快恢复。speed up“加速”,后接名词作宾语,故填recovery。
【8】
考查非谓语动词。句意:由五种草药提取物组成,血必净,一种在2003年严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)流行期间开发和销售的注射液,可以缓解症状,降低死亡率。分析句子可知,谓语动词是developed,故consist用非谓语动词形式,consist of 与其逻辑主语Xuebijing之间是主动关系,用现在分词作定语,且置句首,单词首字母大写,故填Consisting。
【9】
考查宾语从句。句意: 我们不能根据印象判断这些中药或者西药是否有效,但是我们可以根据医学方法来证明。根据语境可知,空格处引导宾语从句,whether/if“是否”,符合题意,故填whether/ if。
【10】
考查连词。句意:我们不能根据印象判断这些中药或者西药是否有效,但是我们可以根据医学方法来证明。前后文是转折关系,故填but。
【题目】请认真阅读下列短文, 并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。
注意: 每个空格只填 1 个单词。 请将答案写在答题卷上相应题号的横线上。
Driverless cars used to be the sort of thing you’d see in sci-fi films, but in 2020 they’re becoming a reality. Autonomous car technology is already being developed by the likes of Lexus, BMW and Mercedes, and we’ve even tested Tesla’s driverless Autopilot system on UK roads. Across the Atlantic, Google is developing its automated technology in the wild, and Apple is rumoured to be working with BMW on its own-probably automated-car.
Fully-driverless tech is still at an advanced testing stage, but partially automated technology has been around for the last few years. Executive saloons like the BMW 7 Series feature automated parking, and can even be controlled remotely.
With so much investment and interest in driverless technology, it’s easy to assume that self-operating cars are likely to happen soon, but they’re much further away than we might think. Before driverless vehicles go to market widely, manufacturers must deal with a range of technical and ethical challenges, and prevent the biggest threat to autonomous technology: humans.
The human problem
Humans present problems for autonomous cars as both drivers and pedestrians, and dealing with our unpredictable behaviour represents a significant challenge for the technology.
The Google Car is one of the most experienced autonomous vehicles. Even so, its interaction with human drivers has given rise to the exposure of one of driverless cars’ main weaknesses. The first injury involving the Google Car wasn’t due to a fault in its system, but human-error. While correctly waiting at traffic lights, Google’s self-driving car was hit by an inattentive driver and, in spite of its sophisticated array (复杂精密的数组) of sensors, there was little it could do to avoid the incident. Luckily, the accident only resulted in minor injury for a few of the passengers, but it’s a reminder that autonomous cars are at risk when surrounded by human road users.
Despite their sophisticated systems, self-driving cars currently have no plan B for human road users. Human drivers are able to interact with each other and make allowances, but also make countless, small mistakes when driving-mistakes to which current self-driving cars simply can’t adapt.
Dealing with pedestrians
The way human drivers interact with pedestrians raises difficult moral and ethical questions for car manufacturers-with implications.
Autonomous cars need to understand the way pedestrians behave, while also imitating the behaviour they’d expect from a human driver. “Everyone has a knowledge of how a human being is going to react, because we are all human beings,” says computer ethics commentator Ben Byford. “So if you walk out in front of a car, and presumably the car driver knows you’re there, they’re going to react in a certain way.”
“ If I walked out in front of a Google car travelling at 60mph, I have no real knowledge of how the vehicle will behave, so I’m effectively putting myself in danger.”
How 【1】 away are we from autonomous cars? | ||
Background information | ● Autonomous car technology has been 【2】 in some famous car manufacturers. ● Partially automated technology has been in 【3】 for the last few years. ● Before our roads are 【4】 with driverless vehicles, manufacturers have a lot of things to do. | |
【5】 about the autonomous technology | The human problem | ● The Google car’s accident has 【6】 one of driverless cars’ weaknesses. ● 【7】 the sophisticated array of sensors, Google’s self-driving car could do little to avoid the accident. ● With no alternative plan, self-driving cars cannot have a good 【8】 with human drivers. |
Dealing with pedestrians | 【9】 human drivers who know pedestrians well, autonomous cars have difficulty in 【10】 their behavior, thus putting pedestrians in danger. |