题目内容
People aren’t walking any more---if they can figure out a way to avoid it.
I felt superior about this matter until the other day I took my car to mail a small parcel.The journey is a matter of 281 steps.But I used the car.And I wasn’t in any hurry, either, I had merely become one more victim of a national sickness: motorosis.
It is an illness to which I had thought myself immune(免疫的), for I was bred in the tradition of going to places on my own two legs.At that time, we regarded 25 miles as good day’s walk and the ability to cover such a distance in ten hours as sign of strength and skill.It did not occur to us that walking was a hardship.And the effect was lasting.When I was 45 years old I raced –and beat—a teenage football player the 168 steps up the Stature of Liberty.
Such enterprises today are regarded by many middle-aged persons as bad for the heart.But a well-known British physician, Sir Adolphe Abrhams, pointed out recently that hearts and bodies need proper exercises.A person who avoids exercise is more likely to have illnesses than one who exercises regularly.And walking is an ideal form of exercise--- the most familiar and natural of all.
It was Henry Thoreau who showed mankind the richness of going on foot.The man walking can learn the trees, flower, insects, birds and animals, the significance of seasons, the very feel of himself as a living creature in a living world, He cannot learn in a car.
The car is a convenient means of transport, but we have made it our way of life.Many people don’t dare to approach nature any more; to them the world they were born to enjoy is all threat.To them security is a steel river thundering on a concrete road.And much of their thinking takes place while waiting for the traffic light to turn green.
I say that the green of forests is the mind’s best light.And none but the man on foot can evaluate what is basic and everlasting.
1.What is the national sickness?
A.Walking too much B.Traveling too much
C.Driving cars too much D.Climbing stairs too much.
2.What was life like when the author was young?
A.People usually went around on foot.
B.people often walked 25 miles a day
C.People used to climb the Statue of Liberty.
D.people considered a ten-hour walk as a hardship.
3.The author mentions Henry Thoreau to prove that
A.middle-aged people like getting back to nature
B.walking in nature helps enrich one’s mind
C.people need regular exercise to keep fit
D.going on foot prevents heart disease
4.What is compared to “a steel river” in Paragraph6?
A.A queue of cars B.A ray of traffic light
C.A flash of lightning D.A stream of people
5.What is the author’s intention of writing this passage?
A.To tell people to reflect more on life.
B.To recommend people to give up driving
C.To advise people to do outdoor activities
D.To encourage people to return to walking
1.C
2.A
3.B
4.A
5.D
【解析】
试题分析:本文主要讲现在的人们都愿意出门乘坐汽车,而不愿意步行,即使很近的路,也要自己开车去,其实有时路上堵车不一定比走着快。并且步行可以看到沿途的树木、花草等,享受一下大自然的风光,作者提倡大家要用以前的交通方式----步行。
1. 细节理解题。根据第二段I had merely become one more victim of a national sickness:motorosis.可知国家的通病是太多的人驾车。故选C.
2. 细节理解题。根据第三段for I was bored in the tradition of going to places on my own two legs.可知作者年轻时人们通常步行,故选A.
3. 细节理解题。根据第五自然段可知作者提到Henry Thoreau步行能够丰富人们的知识,故选B.
4. 词义猜测题。根据第六段The car is a convenient means of transport. Many people don’t dare to approach nature any more.可知这里指的是人们出门坐车,街上的车流量很大,就像河流一样,连续不断,故选A.
5. 作者意图。根据短文的最后一段可知作者提倡大家要用以前的交通方式----步行。选项B是干扰最大的选项,推荐人们放弃驾驶。这个短文里没有提到要人们放弃驾驶自己的汽车,而是尽可能做到采用步行的交通方式。故选D.
考点:考查记叙类短文阅读
No one can avoid being influenced by advertisements. Much as we may pride ourselves on our good taste, we are no longer free to choose the things we want, for advertising exerts(施加) some influence on us. In their efforts to persuade us to buy this or that product, advertisers have made a close study of human nature and have classified(分类) all our little weaknesses.
Advertisers discovered years ago that all of us love to get something for nothing. An advertisement which begins with the magic work FREE can rarely go wrong. These days, advertisers not only offer free samples, but free cars, free houses, and free trips round the world as well. They design hundreds of competitions which will enable us to win huge sums of money. Radio and television have made it possible for advertisers to draw the attention of millions of people in this way.
During a radio program, a company of biscuit manufacturers once asked listeners to bake biscuits and send them to their factory. They offered to pay $10 a pound for the biggest biscuit baked by a listener. The response to this competition was active. Before long, biscuits of all shapes and sizes began arriving at the factory. One lady brought in a biscuit on a wheelbarrow. It weighed nearly 500 pounds. All the biscuits that were sent were carefully weighed. The largest was 713 pounds. It seemed certain that this would win the prize. But just before the competition closed, a lorry arrived at the factory with a truly large biscuit which weighed 2,400 pounds. It had been baked by a college student who had used over 1,000 pounds of flour, 800 pounds of sugar, 200 pounds of fat, and 400 pounds of various other ingredients. The factory had to pay more money than they had expected, for they bought the biscuit from the student for $24,000.
Advertising | |
Customers and advertisers | Though1. _______ of our good taste, customers are 2._____ by advertisements when buying things. |
In fact, advertisers have studied human nature in order to 3._______ customers to buy this or that product. | |
According to their 4.______ ,all customers love to get things for 5. _______. | |
The usually effective means | Advertisers offer free things, which often does 6. ______. |
Hundreds of competitions are 7. ______ for customers to win huge sums of money. | |
Radio and television are used to 8. ______ people’s attention. | |
An exception | By radio, a company of biscuit manufacturers once advertised that they would offer $10 a pound for the biggest biscuit baked by a listener, which 9.______ active response. |
However, they never10.______ to pay $24,000 for a truly large biscuit made by a college student and carried by a lorry. | |
When Barbra Streisand discovered in 2003 that a photograph of her California beach house was among 12,000 photos on the Internet as part of a collection by photographer Kenneth Adelman, she did what any famous person would do: hit him with a $50 million lawsuit. But in trying to hold back the images, she caused a different outcome. Her legal actions led to almost half a million people visiting the website, viewing and copying the photos within a month.
Ever since then, the effect of letting public know something you are trying to keep secret has been called the “Streisand effect”. The problem for anyone trying to suppress information is that the Internet is the world’s biggest and most efficient copying machine. Put a document on to a connected machine and it will spread. So when you want to be famous, you can’t, but if you find yourself in the spotlight and want to erase yourself, you cannot.
There is no shortage of examples of the Streisand effect. Nine-year-old Martha Payne created a simple blog, posting the meals her school served. She took a photo of what was barely a filling meal by anyone’s standards. With the photo, she filled a comment, “Now Dad understands why I am hungry when I get home.” The thing did not go too far, until the local authority banned little Martha from doing that again. Martha posted a supposedly final post called “Goodbye”, explaining everything. Once the media found this out, things went from bad to worse for the authority. Now the blog has more than 9.5 million page views. Martha has even expanded her blog by including pictures of school meals taken by other kids from all over the world, like Germany and Japan.
We can find similar examples throughout history, to be frank. Man has experienced the Streisand effect ever since the birth of mass communication. Why does it exist? Every time you are told not to see what’s in the secret shiny box wrapped in gift paper, you’re going to do everything in your power to do exactly that! Just realizing that knowing something about someone is harmful to their status, we will want to know that piece of information. This is exactly the human nature. This is what lawyers and authorities should be familiar with. Unfortunately, a few of them fail to grasp it.
1.The underlined word “suppress” in Paragraph 2 probably means________.
A. give away B. look into
C. cover up D. search for
2.What speeded up the spread of Martha’s story?
A. Parents’ complaints.
B. The authority’s order.
C. The photos of other kids.
D. Supporting from the school.
3.What is the last paragraph mainly about?
A. The root of Streisand effect.
B. The influence of Streisand effect.
C. People’s reaction to Streisand effect.
D. Historical examples of Streisand effect.
4.What can be inferred from the passage?
A. Streisand effect benefits most famous people.
B. It’s not a good idea to argue against authorities.
C. The ban on something may have opposite effect.
D. Turning to the law is a perfect way to get one out of trouble.