题目内容
CHICAGO ---Call it a reward, or just “bribery(贿赂)”.
Whichever it is, many parents today readily admit to buying off their children, who get goodies(好东西) for anything from behaving in a restaurant to sleeping all night in their own beds.
That’s what worries parenting experts.
“I think that reward systems have a time and a place and work really well in certain situations,” says Marcy Safyer, director of the Adelphi University Institute for Parenting.
“But what often gets lost for people is being able to figure out how to communicate to their kids that doing the thing is rewarding enough,” Safyer says.
Parents and experts alike agree that the dynamic(动力) is partly a reflection of the world we live in. It’s unrealistic to think a parent wouldn’t reward their children with material things sometimes, says Robin Lanzi, a clinical psychologist and mother of four who’s the research director at the Center on Health and Education at Georgetown University.
“But you want to make sure that they match the behavior, so it’s not something huge for something small,” Lanzi says.
She recalls hearing about a father who offered his child a Nintendo Wii game system for scoring a couple goals in a soccer game.
Elizabeth Powell, a mother of two young daughters in Austin, Texas, knows what she means.
“You want to raise them in a way that they’re respectful and appreciate things,” Powell says of her children. “But sometimes, you wonder now if kids appreciate even a new pair of shoes. ”
1.Parenting experts are worried that ____ .
A.today’s children are fed up with material things |
B.parents are rewarding their kids improperly |
C.today’s children are more and more demanding(苛求的) |
D.there is lack of communication between parents and children |
2.What Safyer says suggests that ____ .
A.reward systems are quite limited in developing abilities |
B.reward systems work well regardless of(不管) time and place |
C.reward systems are still not made full use of to develop abilities |
D.reward systems are often used at the wrong time and place |
3.What can we learn from what Robin Lanzi says?
A.She holds a different opinion from other parenting experts. |
B.She thinks children can’t behave well without being rewarded. |
C.She holds a similar belief to Safyer and gives further explanation. |
D.She doesn’t believe in rewarding children for good behavior. |
4.The father who offered his child a Nintendo Wii game system can be regarded as
_____.
A.over-rewarding his child |
B.giving his child proper reward |
C.respecting and appreciating his child |
D.giving something small for something huge |
1.B
2.D
3.C
4.A
【解析】略
Dickson Despommier, a public health professor at Columbia University in New York City developed an idea with his students nine years ago. They imagined people in cities growing crops inside a tall building. Tomatoes could grow on one floor of the skyscraper(摩天大楼), potatoes on the next, small animals and fish on the floor above.
This vertical(垂直的) farm, or "farmscraper", could have space for restaurants and other places that serve food, like schools or hospitals. They could serve foods that are truly locally grown.
But why would anyone want to build a farm indoors in a city? Dickson Despommier believes it will become necessary. The world needs to find places to produce enough food to feed the growing population. Space, he says, is an all-important issue.
The professor also points to the problems of traditional farms. They use a lot of freshwater. Their fertilizer and animal waste can pollute water resources. And their growing seasons can be limited.
But inside the vertical farm, crops could grow all year. And there would be no wind to blow away soil. Farmers would not have to worry about too much or too little rain, or about hot summers, freezing winters or insects. And without insects there would be no need for chemicals to kill them.
Farm machines that .use fossil fuels, like tractors, would not be needed either. And water could be recycled for drinking. "The vertical farm reuses everything, so there is no waste," says Professor Despommier.
Even buildings could be saved. Old buildings could become new farms and provide jobs.
The professor has been actively proposing the idea to cities as far away as Dubai and Canada. But so far it exists only in plans and drawings, and a model at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago.
Critics say building a farmscraper would cost too much, especially considering the price of land in many cities. Dickson Despommier estimates the cost at about twenty to thirty million dollars.
But he says the building would not have to be very tall. And his graduate students have found many empty lots and unused buildings in New York City that could provide space.
【小题1】According to the passage the purpose of proposing the idea of a farm scraper is to .
A.find places to produce enough food |
B.serve food that are truly locally grown |
C.prevent polluting the limited land |
D.save fresh water |
A.It costs less |
B.It saves labor power. |
C.It consumes too much energy |
D.It is more environmentally friendly. |
A.it uses too much land in cities |
B.it costs too much to build one |
C.it causes people to lose their jobs |
D.it exists only in unrealistic plans |
A.A vertical farm has been built in Chicago. |
B.Old buildings could be changed into new farms. |
C.Traditional farms use less water but pollute more water |
D.There are some vertical farms being put into use in Canada. |