题目内容

【题目】阅读下面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式,并将答案填写在答题卡上。

Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old Swedish climate change activist, 1 (elect) as 2019's 'Person of The Year' last week.

In August 2018, tired of the 'refusal' of world leaders 2 (take) action, the young girl started camping in front of the Swedish Parliament every Friday with 3 sign, which said: 'Schools Strike for Climate'.

The teen's act soon spread quickly, 4 (inspire) kids and adults worldwide to take action. By September, 2018, her 5 (week) strike had become a worldwide climate change movement called 'Fridays for the Future', 6 tens of thousands of students skipping school on this day to condemn the inaction of the leaders of their respective countries.

The teenager, who has single-handedly helped bring climate change to the forefront of the global conversation, owes her 7 (succeed) to her Asperger's syndrome. She says, 'I see the world in black and white, and I don't like compromising. 8 I were like everyone else, I would have continued on and not seen this.'

Though Thunberg does not have a magical cure for climate change, she 9 (believe) that climate change can be affected at a grassroots level by educating friends and electing 10 (politician) that support the cause.

【答案】

1was elected

2to take

3a

4inspiring

5weekly

6with

7success

8If

9believes

10politicians

【解析】

这是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述一个名叫Greta Thunberg的瑞典女孩,因政府对气候问题的不作为,她每周五拿着写有“学校为气候罢工”的标牌在议会门口露营。在她的影响下,成千上万的学生加入进来,以此敦促政府采取措施。因为这个举动,Greta Thunberg被评为2019年度人物。

1考查时态和语态。分析句子可知,此处是句子谓语动词,主语Greta Thunbergelect之间是被动关系,由last week判断为一般过去时,应用一般过去时的被动语态,主语是单数,故填was elected

2考查非谓语动词。句意:在20188月,对世界领导拒绝采取行动感到厌烦,这个年轻的女孩开始每周五在瑞典议会门前露营,并拿着写着一个“学校为气候大罢工”的标牌。根据句意和结构可知,此处应用不定式作为名词refusal的后置定语,refusal to take action“拒绝采取行动”,故填to take

3考查冠词。句意:在20188月,对世界领导决绝采取行动感到厌烦,这个年轻的女孩开始每周五在瑞典议会门前露营,并拿着写着一个“学校为气候大罢工”的标牌。sign是可数名词,根据句意可知此处是泛指,应用不定冠词,又sign是辅音音素开头,故填a

4考查非谓语动词。分析句子可知,此处应用非谓语动词作状语,逻辑主语the teen’s actinspire之间是主动关系,应用现在分词,故填inspiring

5考查形容词。分析句子可知,此处应用形容词修饰名词strikeweekly“每周的”,故填weekly

6考查介词。分析句子可知,此处考查with的复合结构作为伴随状语,即with + n + doing,其中doing是宾补,和宾语之间是逻辑上的主动关系,with tons of thousands of students skipping school“成千上万的学生逃学”,故填with

7考查名词。分析句子可知,此处应用名词作为动词owe的宾语,故填success

8考查连词。句意:她说:“我对这个世界的看法是非黑即白,我不喜欢妥协。如果我也像其他人那样,我会继续生活下去,不会看到这些。” 分析句子可知,此处是虚拟语气,再结合句意,可知用连词if符合语境和语法,故填If

9考查动词。分析句子可知,此处是主句谓语动词,由上文的does判断为一般现在时,主语是第三人称单数,谓语动词应用三单现形式,故填believes

10考查名词的数。结合上下文可知,此处意为“选举政治家”,故应用名词作elect的宾语,且该名词作为定语从句的先行词,又由定语从句的谓语动词support判断主语that指代复数名词,故politician是复数,故填politicians

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】阅读下面短文,根据所给情节进行续写,使之构成一个完整的故事。

I first played ping-pong in our basement (地下室) at home. My brother and I asked for an old wooden table from my grandfather. It was painted green. Although it was very simple, it served its purpose every day. My father never really played any other sports with me, but ping-pong was one that he played quite well and it took me plenty of time before I could beat him. My elder brother was also a very good competitor.

When I got to university, I was happy to discover a ping-pong table in the common room. I spent a great deal of time there, often until the midnight. There were about three or four friends that I often played against. We were all at the same skill level. One of them had ever played in a tournament (锦标赛). A friend from Germany said his father had ever won the German national tournament. We took part in a tournament. My ranking (名次) is the third place, but I had beaten the first and second place winners when we had played for fun. I sometimes played with other friends who didn’t play ping-pong well, so I would use my left hand to give them an advantage. But before long I became so skilled with my left hand that they no longer had the advantage.

Later, I played in a ping-pong competition which was held by my university. I lost at first. But because it was double climination (双淘汰制), I went to the loser group. I beat all the players and then played against the student who had beaten me in the first round. Surprisingly, I beat him 3 times and won the competition.

注意:1. 所续写短文的词数应为150左右;

2. 应使用5个短文中标有下划线的关键词语;

3. 续写部分分为两段,每段的开头语已为你写好;

4. 续写完成后,请用下划线标出你所使用的关键词语。

Paragraph 1:

Later, there was a tournament held in the city where I studied.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Paragraph 2:

After the tournament I didn’t often play the sport because of the busy study.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

【题目】 In 1968 Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson set an intelligence test for a class of primary school children at "Oak School" (an invented name) in San Francisco. The teachers were told that the intelligence test bad two purposes. Firstly, it would measure the IQ of the children and secondly it would predict 20% of students who, no matter what their performance to date was like, would be likely to make the most progress during the next school year. The teachers were then told who the predicted top improvers would be.

At the end of the school year, eight months later, the intelligence test was carried out again and, perhaps not surprisingly, the results showed that the 20% of children who had been predicted to improve the most, did in fact do so. They showed, on average, an increase of 12 IQ points on the test, compared with an increase of only 8 points for the other children.

But the fact is that no results of any test were used to predict who would be the top performers. Instead, the lucky children who the teachers were told would be the top improvers were given this label as a matter of chance. This study shows that the label that you are given, and your interaction(互动) with others who notice that label, can have a big influence on the results that you achieve. This phenomenon(现象)has been called the Rosenthal effect. It is also known as the Pygmalion effect, related most famously to the George Bernard Show play Pygmalion , which shows the effect that two men have in changing an untidy flower girl into a well-spoken lady.

For ethical (道德的)reasons the researchers at "Oak School!" only concentrated on trying to produce positive results in the children's performance. However, it is worth asking yourself what the effects on 20% of students considered least likely to improve in the following school year might have been. A frightening thought.

1What did the study find about the predicted top performers at the end of the school year?

A.They showed more interest in tests.B.They really made the most progress.

C.They became less confident than before.D.They were as intelligent as the other children.

2How were the top performers chosen?

A.According to the teachers' judgement.B.Based on the test results.

C.By chance.D.Openly.

3What can we infer about the 20% of students mentioned in the last paragraph?

A.They might be willing to accept positive results.

B.They would likely have frightening thoughts.

C.They would likely make the least progress.

D.They might work much harder than before.

4What is the text mainly about?

A.The Rosenthal effectB.A play by Bernard Shaw.

C.A school in San Francisco.D.The labels given to children.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网