题目内容

Two men were traveling in a very wild and lonely part of America. For days they had not even seen a  1  , only a few huts(木棚子)made of wood, or tents made of skins. Then one day they met an old   2  who earned his living by trapping animals for their fur. They  3  that he knew their language and they had a little  4  with him. One of them  5  him whether he could tell them what the weather would be like within the   6  few days.

“Oh yes,” he said. “Snow is coming, and wind. Then there will be snow for two days, but after that  there will be  7  sunshine.”

“Isn’t that wonderful?” said one man to his friend. “These Indians could  8  the weather. They know more of the secrets of   9  than we do with all our science. They have not been puzzled by modern civilization.” Then he turned to the old Indian.

“Tell me,” he said, “how you knew all that?”

The Indian replied, “I heard it on the   10  .”

1.A.house                   B.tree                       C.town                  D.village

2.A.hunter                  B.Indian                   C.American           D.farmer

3.A.imagined              B.found                    C.showed              D.proved

4.A.concern               B.speech                  C.interest               D.conversation

5.A.told                      B.advised                 C.ordered              D.asked

6.A.last                      B.next                      C.past                   D.recent

7.A.thin                      B.thick                     C.dark                   D.bright

8.A.control                 B.solve                     C.foretell               D.change

9.A.science                B.nature                   C.man                   D.sky

10.A.way                B.mountain                 C.radio               D.satellite

1—5 ABBDD  6—10 BDCBC

练习册系列答案
相关题目

I have recently completed my college degree. The last project was called “Smile”. The class was asked to go out to smile at three people and document their reactions(反应). I am a very friendly person and always smile at everyone and say hello anyway. So, I thought this would be a piece of cake.
My husband, the youngest son and I went out to McDonald. We were standing in line when all of a sudden everyone around us began to back away. As I turned around I smelled a horrible body odour(气味) and saw two poor homeless men standing behind me. As I looked at the short blue-eyed gentleman closest to me, he was “smiling”. The second man fumbled(摸索)with his hands as he stood behind his friend.
The young lady at the counter asked him what they wanted. He said, “Coffee is all, Miss,” because that was all they could afford.
Then I really felt it — I embraced(拥抱)the little man with the blue eyes. That is when I noticed   all eyes in the restaurant were set on me, judging my every action. I smiled and asked two more breakfast meals on and gave them to the men.
The blue-eyed gentleman looked up at me, with tears in his eyes, and said, “Thank you.”
I turned in my project. My teacher said, “Can I share this?” I slowly nodded as she got the attention of the class. She began to read and that is when I knew that we as human beings share this need to heal people and to be healed.
In my own way I had touched the people at McDonald’s and every soul that heard the story in the classroom. But, I graduated with one of the biggest lessons I would ever learn.
【小题1】 The underlined part “a piece of cake” in Paragraph 1 means _______.

A.easyB.embarrassingC.movingD.comfortable
【小题2】Why did people around the author in the McDonald step back?
A.Because they were very polite to the two men.
B.Because they were moved by the two men.
C.Because the two men smelt terrible.
D.Because the two men seemed unfriendly.
【小题3】 Why did the two men only buy coffee?
A.Because they didn’t have enough money.
B.Because they didn’t feel hungry.
C.Because they knew others would help them.
D.Because they were looked down upon.
【小题4】How did the teacher think of the author’s project?
A.Hard to believe.B.Interesting to read.
C.Very puzzling.D.Very satisfying.
【小题5】 What did the author think she learn from the story?
A.A friend in need is a friend indeed
B.Helping others can bring pleasure to many people.
C.Nothing is difficult to a willing heart.
D.Don’t judge people according to their appearance.

Chinese tennis player Li Na didn’t win the Australian Open Championship on Saturday, but she still made the history books.
Li, who lost to Kim Clijsters of Belgium in three sets (3-6, 6-3, 6-3), is the first player from China to make it to a Grand Slam final.
The boss defeated a bit of the feel-good story for China and for Li, who on Thursday defeated No. 1 player Caroline Wozniacki in the semifinals in Melbourne. Li is ranked fifth.
In an interview Li said she was proud of her effort. “I think I play great tennis,” she said. “ I mean, she plays better than me. After the match, I make a joke: tennis should only play one set.
Bai Yan, a member of China’s men’s national team member and Li Na’s friend, said the loss was disappointing, but still a bright starting point.
“To tell you the truth I feel a little bit down, all of us. But you know she is still the best, and she’s still our hero in everybody’s eyes,” said Bai. “This is just the start.”.
Win or lose, Li’s appearance in the Australian Open finals was seen as a major victory for tennis in China, where badminton and table tennis rules.
Fans across China gathered to watch the match. Li’s mother joined fans at a restaurant in her hometown of Wuhan. In Bejing, fans crowded together to watch China’s national tennis match.
“ Tennis is still relatively a new sport in China,” said Michael Chang, the Chinese-American who was the first Asian grand slam champion, in an interview with CNN. “ To be able to see Li Na have as much success as she has… this could be the start of something very special for tennis in China.”
“Li will definitely change the sport of tennis in China and that is a great thing,” Chang said.
【小题1】 What’s the main idea of the passage?

A.Chinese tennis star Li Na’s tennis career.
B.A fierce tennis match at Australian Open.
C.Chinese tennis star made history at Australian Open.
D.Chinese tennis remained to be tested and challenged.
【小题2】 Which is true according to the passage?
A.Li Na’s failure let the Chinese down.
B.Li Na ranked fifth at Australian Open.
C.LI Na’s mother attended the match with her.
D.Li Na made a new starting point of China
【小题3】What’s the meaning of the underlined words “tennis should only play one set” (Para 4)?
A.Li Na was not satisfied with the rule of tennis match.
B.Li Na was not satisfied with her own performance.
C.Li Na had a bad opinion of Clijsters.
D.Li Na took pride in her effort.
【小题4】According to what Chang said in the last two paragraphs, we can imply that ________.
A.it’s normal that Li Na failed because tennis is a new sport in China
B.Li Na has the advantage to change tennis sport in China
C.China still falls behind other countries in tennis sport
D.Li Na has great difficulty in defeating others because of weak ability

Which is sillier: denying we ever went to the moon or trying to convince the true non-believers?

Once upon a time—July 20, 1969, to be specific – two men got out of their little spaceship and wandered around on the moon for a while. Ten more men walked on the moon over the next three and a half years. The end.

Unfortunately, not quite. A fair number of Americans think that this whole business of moon landings really is a fairy tale. They believe that the landings were a big hoax (骗局) staged in the Mojave Desert, to convince everyone that U.S. technology was the “best” in the whole wide world.

Which is the harder thing to do: Send men to the moon or make believe we did? The fact is that the physics behind sending people to the moon is simple. You can do it with computers whose entire memory capacities can now fit on chips the size of postage stamps and that cost about as much as, well, a postage stamp. I know you can because we did.

However, last fall NASA considered spending $15,000 on a public-relations campaign to convince the unimpressed that Americans had in fact gone to the moon. That idea was mostly a reaction to a Fox television program, first aired in February 2001, that claimed to expose the hoax. The show’s creator is a publicity hound (猎狗) who has lived up to the name in more ways than one by hounding Buzz Aldrin, the second man on the moon. Mr. X (as I will call him, thereby denying him the joyous sight of his name in print) recently followed Buzz Aldrin around and called him “a thief, liar and coward” until the 72-year-old astronaut finally lost it and hit the 37-year-old Mr. X in the face.

Anyway, NASA’s publicity campaign began to slow down. The nonbelievers took the campaign as NASA’s effort to hide something while the believers said that $15,000 to convince people that the world was round — I mean, that we had gone to the moon — was simply a waste of money. (Actually, the $15,000 was supposed to pay for an article by James E. Oberg, an astronomy writer who, with Aldrin, has contributed to Scientific American.)

If NASA’s not paying Oberg, perhaps it could put the money to good use by hiring two big guys to drag Neil Armstrong out of the house. Armstrong is an extremely private man, but he is also the first man on the moon, so maybe he has a duty to be a bit more outspoken about the experience. Or NASA could just buy Aldrin a commemorate plaque (纪念匾) for his recent touch on the face of Mr. X.

1.We can learn from Paragraphs 2 and 3 that some Americans believe _______.

A.moon landings were invented

B.U.S. technology was the best

C.moon landing ended successfully

D.the Mojave Desert was the launching base

2.According to the writer, which of the following is to blame for the story about the hoax?

A.NASA’s publicity campaign.               B.The Fox television program.

C.Buzz Aldrin.                            D.James E. Oberg.

3.The believers think that NASA’s publicity campaign is ________.

A.proof to hide the truth

B.stupid and unnecessary

C.needed to convince the non-believers

D.important to develop space technology

4.What is implied in the last paragraph?

A.NASA should not bother with the non-believers.

B.Armstrong was a very private and determined person.

C.Armstrong should be as outspoken as Buzz Aldrin.

D.NASA should send more astronauts to outer space.

 

The man sitting opposite Robert was the Financial Controller. Everybody called him “the FC” for short. He made all the decisions about money. Robert needed some more. That was why he had to see him. The two men did not get on very well. In fact, they had always disliked each other.

“Your request is out of the question,” the FC said. Robert had difficulty in controlling himself, but he managed somehow. He explained that he wanted the money in order to make more programmes.

“And why do you want to do that?” the FC asked sharply. Again, Robert almost lost his temper. “Because more and more people are listening to my department’s programmes. There’s great demand for them,” he answered.

The FC did not seem to believe him. But Robert had a report on the numbers of listeners to all EBC programmes. The FC became less confident. Robert threw the report down on the table and told him to read it.

The FC looked at it in silence. The figures (数字) proved that he had been wrong, but he did not want to admit it. “Well,” he finally said, “I may have made a small mistake.” Robert noticed the word “may.” He got up to leave. But he had the feeling that he would get the money after all.

1.In the story the Financial Controller was a person who was in charge of

A.Robert’s department’s programmes      B.EBC programmes

C.EBC money                            D.both B and C

2. “Your request is out of the question.”Here “out of the question”means

A.without any question                    B.with some question

C.impossible                             D.possible

3.Robert decided to make more programmes because

A.he wanted to meet the needs of the listeners

B.“the FC” disliked him

C.the members of his department wanted him to do so

D.he wanted to show himself off

4.Why were more and more people listening to Robert’s programmes?

A.Because he always lost his temper (脾气)

B.Because he disliked “the FC”

C.Because the programmes were rich and to the taste of the listeners

D.We don’t know

5.Who do you think won the argument(争论)in the end?

A.The Financial Controller                  B.Robert            C.Nobody    D.The listeners

 

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网