题目内容

【题目】BELJLNG Eating at a Beijing restaurant is usually an adventure for foreigners, and particularly when they get the chance to order “chicken without sex life” or “red burned lion head”.

Sometimes excited but mostly confused, embarrassed or even terrified, many foreigners have long complained about mistranslations of Chinese dishes. And their complaints are often valid, but such an experience at Beijing’s restaurants will apparently soon be history.

Foreign visitors will no longer, hopefully, be confused by oddly worded restaurant menus in the capital if the government’s plan to correctly translate 3,000 Chinese dishes is a success and the translations are generally adopted.

The municipal(市政)office of foreign affairs has published a book to recommend English translations of Chinese dishes, which aims to help restaurants avoid bizarre translations. It provides the names of main dishes of famous Chinese cuisines in plain English, “an official with the city’s Foreign Affairs office said .” Restaurants are encouraged to use the proposed translations, but it will not be compulsory .“ It’s the city’s latest effort to bridge the culture gap for foreign travelers in China.

Coming up with precise translations is a daunting task, as some Chinese culinary(烹饪的)techniques are untranslatable and many Chinese dishes have no English-language equivalent. The translators, after conducting a study of Chinese restaurants in English-speaking countries, divided the dish names into four categories: ingredients, cooking method, taste and name of a person or a place. For some traditional dishes, pinyin, the Chinese phonetic system, is used, such as mapo tofu (previously often literally translated as “beancurd made by woman with freckles”), baozi (steamed stuffed bun ) and jiaozi (dumplings) to “reflect the Chinese cuisine culture,” according to the book.

“The book is a blessing to tourist guides like me. Having it, I don’t have to rack my brains trying to explain Chinese dishes to foreign travellers,” said Zheng Xiaodong, a 31- year old employee with a Beijing-based travel agency.

“I will buy the book as I major in English literature and I’d like to introduce Chinese cuisine culture to more foreign friends,” said Han Yang, a postgraduate student at the University of International Business and Economics.

It is not clear if the book will be introduced to other parts of China. But on Tuesday, this was the most discussed topic on weibo.com, China’s most popular microblogging site.

【1What’s the best title of the passage?

A. An adventure for foreigners who eat in Beijing.

B. Confusing mistranslations of Chinese dishes

C. Chinese dishes to have “official” English names

D. The effort to bridge the culture gap

【2“chicken without sex life” or “red burned lion head” are mentioned in the beginning of the passage to show__________.

A. some Chinese dishes are not well received

B. some Chinese dishes are hard to translate

C. some Chinese dishes are mistranslated

D. some Chinese dishes are not acceptable

【3What measure has the municipal office taken?

A. Recommending a book on Chinese dishes

B. Advocating using precise translation for Chinese dishes

C. Publishing a book on China’s dietary habits

D. Providing the names of main Chinese dishes

【4What’s the meaning of the underlined word “daunting” in paragraph 5?

A. discouraging B. disappointing

C. confusing D. worthwhile

【5What’s the attitude of most people to the book according to the passage?

A. not clear B. excited

C. favorable D. divided

【答案】

【1】C

【2】C

【3】B

【4】A

【5】C

【解析】试题分析:本文由非同寻常的误译中国菜名开篇,讲述了误译中国菜名给外国友人带来的诸多误解。而政府也在积极解决由文化差异带来的误解。相继出台了相关政策和发布一本权威的菜名翻译书。并且获得了不同人的认同。但是翻译菜名仍然是一个巨大的工程,因为有些中国的烹饪技术是无法翻译的,还有一些在中国菜名在英文里没有相对应的单词。

【1】主旨大意题。文章开头就谈到中国菜名的误译给外国友人带来的惊讶和误解等诸多不便,而政府也出台了相关政策以及翻译样本,这些都是在解决一个问题——如何翻译中国菜。故选C。

【2】细节理解题。定位到第二段第一句Sometimes excited but mostly confused, embarrassed or even terrified, many foreigners have long complained about mistranslations of Chinese dishes.“有时候面对这些菜名外国人会感到激动更多时候是迷惑、尴尬和害怕。他们老早就抱怨对中国菜名的误译。”由此可见第一段提出的一些菜名是为了引出下文中外国人对中国菜名误译的态度。故选C。

【3】事实理解题。定位到第四段。文中说到市政府发布了一本中国菜名英译的书就是为了避免错误翻译。同时一位外国事务所的官员说Restaurants are encouraged to use the proposed translations, but it will not be compulsory .“ It’s the city’s latest effort to bridge the culture gap for foreign travelers in China.饭店应该采取合适翻译菜名,而这也是这个城市最近为文化差异搭起桥梁的举措。故选B。

【4】语义理解题。联系下文as some Chinese culinary techniques are untranslatable and many Chinese dishes have no English-language equivalent.说到,有些中国的烹饪技术是无法翻译的,还有一些在中国菜名在英文里没有相对应的单词。所以可知精确翻译是一个令人沮丧,难以解决的问题。故选A,discouraging“令人沮丧,令人气妥的。”

【5】推理判断题。从六、七两段的人物语言可看出,人们对这本书的态度是支持的。北京的一个导游认为这本书是一个福音,因为它解决了导游在向外国游客解释菜名时突然卡壳的尴尬。而做外贸经济的学生来说,他可以把这本书作为自己的英语教材,也可以送人等。故选C。

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】In China,cultural differences arose from growing rice or wheat.Different thinking styles between northern and southern Chinese people can trace(追溯)their roots to rice fields and wheat fields.

Rice farming promotes a holistic(整体的)focus on distinguishing relationships among people and objects,and valuing others as much as or more than oneself, say psychologist Thomas Talhelm of the University of Virginia and his colleagues.Holistic thinking among many modem Chinese people partly reflects regional histories of building communal irrigation systems(共有灌溉系统)and cooperatively planting and harvesting rice fields over thousands of years.

They draw that conclusion based on studies of college students from regions with different agricultural practices.Students from southern and central China’s rice.growing provinces think holistically, even though they have probably never farmed rice,Talhelm’s group reports.In contrast,students from northern and central Chinese provinces that have specialized in wheat growing exhibit a preference for abstract analysis and self over others,the scientists find.Wheat is less labor-intensive(劳动密集型)to grow than rice,SO farmers can plant and harvest crops without much help from neighbors.Analytical,individualistic thinking is not more common among students from richer

Provinces, contrary to the argument that this attitude springs from modernization. ”Rice theory might explain why East Asia is so much less individualistic than expected based on its wealth, Talhelm says.

Talhelms team tested 1,162 Chinese students,who Viewed lists of three items,such as a rabbit,a dog and a carrot. For each list,students chose two items that belonged together. Earlier research found that analytical thinkers often group items according to categories,so rabbits and dogs go together.Holistic thinkers tend to 1ook for relationships,such as rabbits eating carrots. Students from rice-growing areas made an average of around seven to nine holistic matches of 10 possible matches,compared with roughly f1ve to seven holistic matches for those from Wheat-growing areas.

Talhelm’s team also analyzed national statistics in China from 1 996,2000 and 2010 and found a higher divorce rate and a greater number of successful patents for new inventions in wheat-growing provinces than in rice-growing provinces. That trend is in line with the ides that analytical thinking develops both individualism and creativity.

【1People who think holistically probably_____________.

A.come from wheat—growing areas

B.1ive in northern and central China

C.rely more on themselves

D.think of others before themselves

【2Which of the following statements is true?

A.East Asia is poorer than the other areas of Asia.

B.Modernization contributes to analytic al thinking.

C. Analytical thinkers tend to pick out items by type.

D.Richer people show more individualistic thinking.

【3The author develops the passage mainly by____________.

A.making comparisons

B. listing examples

C.telling his personal experience

D. presenting problem and solution

【4What would be the best title for the passage?

A.Cultural differences in China

B.1isting examples

C.Chinese people tracing their roots

D. Farming influences thinking styles

【题目】The passages below discuss the retirement age.

Passage 1:

In the United States,the financial crisis has left the country with 11 million fewer jobs than Americans need now.No matter how tough the policy ,we are not going to find 11 million new jobs soon.So common sense suggests we should make some decisions about who should come first:older people,who have already worked three or four decades at hard jobs? Or younger people,many just out of school,with fresh skills and ambitions?

The answer is obvious.Older people who would like to retire and would do so if they could afford it should get some help.The right step is to reduce,not increase,the retirement age.As a rough cut,why not make it a law to set a three—year window during which the age for receiving full Social Security benefits would drop to 62——providing a voluntary ,one—time,grab-it-now bonus for leaving work? Let them go home! With a secure pension(退休金)and medical care,they will be happier.Young people who need work will be happier.And there will also be more jobs.With pension security, older people will consume services until the end of their lives.They will become.each and every one,an employer.

Passage 2:

Too many people see longer working lives as a worry rather than an opportunity—and not just because they are going to be chained to their desks.Some worry that there will not be enough jobs to go around.This misunderstanding,known to economists as the“lump of labour fallacy(劳动总量固定的谬论)”,was once used to argue that women should stay at home and leave all the jobs for breadwinning males.Now /span>lump-of-labourites say that keeping the old at work would deprive(剥夺)the young of employment.The idea that society can become

better-off by paying more of its citizens to be idle(无所事事的)is clearly ridiculous.On that reasoning,if the retirement age came down to 25 we would all be as rich as Bill Gates.

【1In Passage 1,one reason for suggesting earlier retirement in the US is the_______

A.tough policy B.stable pension

C.high unemployment D.free medical care

【2In Passage I,the writer suggests encouraging older people to retire earlier by____________.

A.cutting their pension if they remain at work

B.giving them an extra sum o f money on retiring

C.convincing them that young people need work

D.offering them a bonus each year for three years

【3Lump-of-laborites believe that____________.

A.young citizens should be better paid

B.the old should leave jobs for the young

C.males should earn bread for the family

D.earlier retirement will lead to a poorer society

【4What is the author’s attitude towards earlier retirement in Passage 2?

A.Negative. B.Positive.

C.Unconcerned. D.Tolerant.

【题目】Americans gave nearly $300 billion away last year. Do you know the reason? Beyond the noble goals of helping others, it is that giving will make them happier.

It is a fact that givers are happier people than non-givers. According to the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, a survey of 30,000 American households, people who give money to charity are 43% more likely than non-givers to say they are “very happy” about their lives. Similarly, volunteers are 42% more likely to be very happy then non-volunteers.

The happiness difference between givers and non-givers is not due to differences in their personal characteristics, such as income or religion. Imagine two people who are identical in terms of income and faith, as well as age, education, politics, sex, and family circumstances, but one donates money and volunteers, while the other does not. The giver will be, on average, over 40 percentage points more likely to be very happy than the non-givers.

A number of studies have researched exactly why charity leads to happiness. The surprising conclusion is that giving affects our brain chemistry. For example, people who give often report feelings of euphoria, which psychologists have referred to as the “Helper’s High”. They believe that charitable activity produces a very mild version of the sensations people get from drugs like morphine and heroin.

Of course, not only does giving increase our happiness, but also our happiness increases the possibility that we will give. Everyone prefers to give more when they are happy. Researchers have investigated this by conducting experiments in which people are asked about their happiness before and after they participate in a charitable activity, such as volunteering to help children or serving meals to the poor. The result is clear that giving has a strong, positive causal impact on our happiness, so does happiness on giving

1According to Paragraph 2. We can learn that .

A. only those people who gave money to charity will be happy

B. more givers say they feel having happy lives than non-givers

C. those who donate money are happier than those who volunteer

D. 42% of the volunteers say they are as happy as the non-volunteers

2What causes the happiness difference?

A. Income. B. Faith. C. Education. D. Donation.

3The underlined word “euphoria” in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to .

A. relaxation B. uncertainty

C. nervousness D. pleasure

4If a person feels happy, he may .

A. ask for more donations B. stop charitable activity

C. be likely to give more D. cook food for the poor

5Which of the following is the main theme of this passage?

A. Giving brings happiness. B. Americans love donating.

C. The happiness difference. D. Feelings of volunteers.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网