题目内容
An environmental group called the Food Commission is unhappy and disappointed because of the sale of bottled water from
surely the extremely stupid use of fuel when there is plenty of water in the
Counting the number of miles traveled by a product is a strange way of trying to tell the true situation of the environmental damage clone by an industry. Most food is transported around the world on container ships that are extremely energy-efficient (高能效的). It should be noted that a ton of butter transported 25 miles in a truck to a farmers' market does not necessarily use less fuel on its journey than a similar product transported hundreds of miles by sea. Besides, the idea of "food miles" ignores the amount of fuel used in the production. It is possible to cut down your food miles by buying tomatoes grown in Britain rather than those grown in Ghana; the difference is that the British ones will have been raised in heated greenhouses and the Ghanaian ones in the open sun.
What the idea of "food miles” does provide, however, is the chance to cut out Third World countries from First World food markets. The number of miles traveled by our food should, as I see it, be regarded as a sign of the success of the global (全球的) trade system, not a sign of damage to the environment.
68. The Food Commission is angry because it thinks that_______
A.
B. some imported goods cause environmental damage
C. growing certain vegetables damages the environment
D. people waste energy buying food from other countries
69. The phrase "food miles" in the passage refers to the distance _______.
A. that a food product travels to a market
B. that a food product travels from one market to another
C. between
D. between a Third World country and a First World food market
70. By comparing tomatoes raised in
A. British tomatoes are healthier than Ghanaian ones
B. Ghanaian tomatoes taste better than British ones
C. cutting down food miles may not necessarily save fuel
D. protecting the environment may cost a lot of money
71. From the passage we know that the author is most probably.__
A. a supporter of free global trade
B. a member of the Food Commission
C. a supporter of First World food markets
D. a member of an energy development group
议论文。作者通过对当前环保组织对事物在全球范围内的运送,表示担忧而引发的思考,进而表达自己的观点。全球贸易一体化是对能源节约还是浪费,作者有自己的观点。
68.D.
解析:推理题。第一段谈到食物委员会认为运送事物是能源的一种浪费。
69.A.
解析:词义推测。从产地到市场所走的距离。
70.C.
解析:推理题。依据第二段的制作者将英国种植的西红柿与加纳种植的西红柿进行比较,是要表明即使在英国种植食品,也需要fuel,不一定能节约fuel.
71.A.
解析:推理题。依据最后一段最后一句话The number of miles traveled by our food should, as I see it, be regarded as a sign of the success of the global (全球的) trade system, not a sign of damage to the environment。作者很清楚地表达了自己的观点。
Now let's look ourselves as a species in relation to ecosystem balance.Modern scientists believe that humankind, like other animals, evolved(进化) through millions of years of changes and adaptations to the environment and that our most direct evolutionary ancestor was probably an earlier species of the primate(monkey, ape) group. Despite this similarity with other creatures, however, the evolution of humankind differs from that of other species in one important and unique way.
In other species, evolution has led to specialization, both in the species abilities and in its place within the environmental structure. For example, the giraffe is much adapted to feeding on treetops, but it is also specialized and thus limited to feeding on trees and shrubs. Only with great difficulty can it bend down to graze on the ground. Similarly, the anteater is extremely well adapted to eating ants but is unable to catch or eat other animals. The same is true for countless other species.
For humankind it is opposite. Our evolution had led to a very generalized ability. Our highly developed intelligence and ability to make and handle tools mean that we can do almost anything. Humans evolved in such a way that we are able to move into every environment on Earth and even into space. No natural competitor offers great resistance, and other natural enemies such as disease have been controlled.
Said another way, we see in humankind a great imbalance between biological potential and environmental resistance. The result is the rapidly increasing world population, frequently referred to as the population explosion. Further, to support our growing population, natural ecosystems are being increasingly displaced by human habitations, agriculture, and other human supporting activities.
【小题1】From the passage we can infer that in the course of evolution _______.
A.humankind is very important to earlier species, such as the primate group |
B.human beings are limited by the environment while animals are not |
C.human beings become more and more different from each other |
D.humankind has experienced a generalization rather than specialization in ability |
A.monkeys and anteaters | B.tigers and apes |
C.apes and monkeys | D.monkeys and giraffes |
A.increase the population |
B.resist natural offers |
C.go to the moon |
D.cure all diseases |
A.the population explosion |
B.the destruction of human habitations |
C.the growth of natural ecosystem |
D.the specialization of humans |
Now let’s look ourselves as a species in relation to ecosystem balance.Modern scientists believe that humankind, like other animals, evolved(进化) through millions of years of changes and adaptations to the environment and that our most direct evolutionary ancestor was probably an earlier species of the primate(monkey, ape) group. Despite this similarity with other creatures, however, the evolution of humankind differs from that of other species in one important and unique way.
In other species, evolution has led to specialization, both in the species abilities and in its place within the environmental structure. For example, the giraffe is much adapted to feeding on treetops, but it is also specialized and thus limited to feeding on trees and shrubs. Only with great difficulty can it bend down to graze on the ground. Similarly, the anteater is extremely well adapted to eating ants but is unable to catch or eat other animals. The same is true for countless other species.
For humankind it is opposite. Our evolution had led to a very generalized ability. Our highly developed intelligence and ability to make and handle tools mean that we can do almost anything. Humans evolved in such a way that we are able to move into every environment on Earth and even into space. No natural competitor offers great resistance, and other natural enemies such as disease have been controlled.
Said another way, we see in humankind a great imbalance between biological potential and environmental resistance. The result is the rapidly increasing world population, frequently referred to as the population explosion. Further, to support our growing population, natural ecosystems are being increasingly displaced by human habitations, agriculture, and other human supporting activities.
【小题1】From the passage we can infer that in the course of evolution _______.
A.humankind is very important to earlier species, such as the primate group |
B.human beings are limited by the environment while animals are not |
C.human beings become more and more different from each other |
D.humankind has experienced a generalization rather than specialization in ability |
A.monkeys and anteaters | B.tigers and apes |
C.apes and monkeys | D.monkeys and giraffes |
A.increase the population |
B.resist natural offers |
C.go to the moon |
D.cure all diseases |
A.the population explosion |
B.the destruction of human habitations |
C.the growth of natural ecosystem |
D.the specialization of humans |