题目内容
A group of graduates, well established in their careers, were talking at a reunion and decided to visit their old university professor, now retired. During their visit, the conversation turned to complaints about stress in their work and lives.
Offering his guests hot chocolate, the professor went into the kitchen and returned with a large pot of hot chocolate and other things including cups-porcelain(瓷杯子), glass, crystal, some plain looking, some expensive, some elegant -- telling them to help themselves to the hot chocolate.
When they all had a cup of hot chocolate in hand, the professor said: "I notice that all the nice looking and expensive cups were taken, leaving behind the plain and cheap ones. While it is normal for you to want only the best for yourselves, that is the source of your problems and stress. The cup that you're drinking from adds nothing to the quality of the hot chocolate. In most cases it is just more expensive and in some cases even hides what we drink. What all of you really wanted was hot chocolate, not the cup; but you consciously went for the best cups... And then you began eyeing each others cups. Now consider this: Life is the hot chocolate; your job, money and position in society are the cups. They are just tools to hold and contain life. The cup you have does not define, nor change the quality of life you have. Sometimes, by concentrating only on the cup, we fail to enjoy the hot chocolate we have. The happiest people don't have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything that they have. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Thank the Lord for your blessings in 2011. And enjoy your hot chocolate in 2012!”
1. When did they decide to go to see their professor?
A.After the reunion. |
B.During the get-together. |
C.Before they graduated. |
D.Just after the professor retired. |
2.Why did the professor offer them different cups?
A.Because cups were not enough for everyone. |
B.Because cups were beautiful. |
C.Because the professor wanted to teach them something. |
D.Because hot chocolate should be contained in different cups. |
3.What caused the professor to say those words?
A.Their graduation. |
B.Their reunion. |
C.Their visit. |
D.Their complaints. |
4.What does the word “cup” in this passage refer to?
A.Life |
B.happy things in life |
C.hot chocolate |
D.tools to hold and contain life |
5.What is the purpose of the professor’s words?
A.To tell them life is not easy, so try their best to be happy. |
B.To educate them that the happiest people don't have the best of everything. |
C.To wish them to be grateful to their life and make the best of everything that they have. |
D.To use different cups to tell them they should try different things in life. |
1.B
2.C
3.D
4.D
5.C
【解析】
试题分析:
1.B 细节题。根据第一段第一句A group of graduates, well established in their careers, were talking at a reunion and decided to visit their old university professor, now retired.。可知是在同学联谊会后,故A正确。
2.C 推理题。根据文章最后一段倒数第三行The happiest people don't have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything that they have. 说明老教授在给他们讲道理,说明世界上最幸福的人并不一定拥有世界上所有最好的东西,而是在于他们能极大限度的利用他们所拥有的。故C正确。
3.D 细节题。根据第一段第二句the conversation turned to complaints about stress in their work and lives.可知,是他们的抱怨引起了老教授说了那番话故D正确。
4.D 词义题。根据文章They are just tools to hold and contain life.说明cup就是指掌控生活的工具的故D正确。
5.C 主旨大意题。根据文章最后一段倒数第三行The happiest people don't have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything that they have.。说明老教授的此番话的目的在于让他们对生活学会感恩,尽力去利用自己身边所拥有的东西。故C 正确。
考点:考查哲理类阅读
点评:文章讲述了一群大学生工作以及生活的故事,想告诉我们不要过多的追求不属于我们的东西,而是要利用好现有的东西。本文主要考查了细节题推理题,要求考生根据文章内容合理判断,准确定位,进行归纳总结。
A few days ago we – that’s me and the husband – took a cab to the station. Chat with the driver fell to the wrong of cyclists, and the misunderstanding of the road rules. So far as the rules of the road go, there seems to be one basic principle: when you are driving a car you hate bikes, when you are riding a bike you hate cars (and I guess walkers hate everyone).
There is an obvious difference of viewpoint built in here. It wasn’t until I started to drive a car (almost 20years after I had first rode a bike) that I actually realized that you could not see a cyclist at night without lights. In fact I now want to shout at late night cyclists without lights(like motortists once did at me): “You’ll get killed, sunshine, I can’t see you.”
The problem is that cyclists do ride headlong into danger. It's not just not having lights. It’s biking on pavements (and so threatening to injure a load of innocent walkers in the process) and biking down one-way streets the wrong way.
I admit that I do bike the wrong way down a one-way street sometimes. My feeble(软弱无力) defense is that I try always to do it as if I know I was doing wrong. That is slowly, with an apologetic look on the face, and ready to get off at any minute. I can’t bear the guys(一伙人) (usually, but not always it is guys) who do it as if they owned the place, and at high speed.
So cyclists are not entirely innocent. But they are among the disadvantaged groups, because the bottom line is that a car or a lorry can kill a cyclist and not the other way around.
1.When did the writer realize the danger for late night cyclists without lights?
A. Not until she became a driver herself.
B. Not until she had driven a car for 20 years.
C. After she was shouted at by a motorist.
D. After she was once knocked down by a group of guys.
2.When the writer biked the wrong way down a one way street, she felt_________.
A. angry B. guilty C. innocent D. proud
3.Which group is most likely to face danger according to the writer?
A. walkers B. passers-by C. cyclists D. motorists
4.What can we learn about the writer?
A. She often took a cab with her husband.
B. She has been a motorist for over 20 years.
C. She used to ride a bike without lights at night.
D. She often biked the wrong way down a one way street.