题目内容
A group of frogs were traveling through the woods, and two of them fell into a deep pit(坑). When the other frogs saw 1. a deep pit it was, they told the two frogs that they were as good as 2. (die) . The two frogs didn't listen to the others and tried to jump out of the pit with all their might. The other frogs kept telling them to stop. Finally, one of the frogs heard what the other frogs 3. (say) and gave up, so he died.
The other frog went on jumping as hard as he could 4. (get) out. Once again, the other frogs cried at him and told him to stop and just allow 5. to die, but he jumped even 6. (hard) and finally made himself out. When he was out, the other frogs said, "Didn't you hear us?" The frog explained to them that 7. was wrong with his hearing. He thought they were encouraging him 8. whole time.
There is power of life and death in the tongue. An encouraging word to someone 9. is down can lift him or her up and help them make it 10. the day, while bad words can rob another of the spirit to go on in difficult times. Be careful of what you say.
1.what
2.dead
3.were saying
4.to get
5.himself
6.harder
7.something
8.the
9.who
10.through
【解析】试题分析：文章大意：两只青蛙掉进了深坑里，同伴们都认为它们上不来了，于是就劝它俩放弃，其中一只放弃了，死掉了。而另一只是聋子，它以为同伴们是在鼓励它，于是鼓足勇气，最后一跃跳了出来。
1.saw 后面接的句子是感叹句，用what引导，What a deep pit it is！多深的一个坑啊！
2.as good as“跟……一样”前面有were，所以用die的形容词形式dead。
3.一只青蛙听到其他青蛙在说什么，所以用进行时表示were saying。
4.另一只青蛙在竭尽所能地往上跳，目的是为了出来，用to do表目的，所以填to get。
5.其他青蛙向它喊，“别费劲了，放弃吧。”allow sb to do“让某人做某事”，所以sb用himself。
6.前面出现过hard，这儿用even修饰比较级harder。
7.青蛙向同伴们解释它的听觉有毛病，something is wrong with his hearing。
8.短语the whole time“整个时间；所有的时间”
9.先行词是someone，关系词用who引导定语从句。
10.帮他们度过一天，用make it through the day。
名校课堂系列答案A few days ago we – that’s me and the husband – took a cab to the station. Chat with the driver fell to the wrong of cyclists, and the misunderstanding of the road rules. So far as the rules of the road go, there seems to be one basic principle: when you are driving a car you hate bikes, when you are riding a bike you hate cars (and I guess walkers hate everyone).
There is an obvious difference of viewpoint built in here. It wasn’t until I started to drive a car (almost 20years after I had first rode a bike) that I actually realized that you could not see a cyclist at night without lights. In fact I now want to shout at late night cyclists without lights(like motortists once did at me): “You’ll get killed, sunshine, I can’t see you.”
The problem is that cyclists do ride headlong into danger. It's not just not having lights. It’s biking on pavements (and so threatening to injure a load of innocent walkers in the process) and biking down one-way streets the wrong way.
I admit that I do bike the wrong way down a one-way street sometimes. My feeble(软弱无力) defense is that I try always to do it as if I know I was doing wrong. That is slowly, with an apologetic look on the face, and ready to get off at any minute. I can’t bear the guys(一伙人) (usually, but not always it is guys) who do it as if they owned the place, and at high speed.
So cyclists are not entirely innocent. But they are among the disadvantaged groups, because the bottom line is that a car or a lorry can kill a cyclist and not the other way around.
1.When did the writer realize the danger for late night cyclists without lights?
A. Not until she became a driver herself.
B. Not until she had driven a car for 20 years.
C. After she was shouted at by a motorist.
D. After she was once knocked down by a group of guys.
2.When the writer biked the wrong way down a one way street, she felt_________.
A. angry B. guilty C. innocent D. proud
3.Which group is most likely to face danger according to the writer?
A. walkers B. passers-by C. cyclists D. motorists
4.What can we learn about the writer?
A. She often took a cab with her husband.
B. She has been a motorist for over 20 years.
C. She used to ride a bike without lights at night.
D. She often biked the wrong way down a one way street.