题目内容
第II卷(共两部分，满分35分)
第四部分：写作(共两节．满分35分)
第一节：短文改错(共10小题；每小题1分，满分10分)
此题要求改正所给短文中的错误。对标有题号的每一行做出判断：如无错误，在该行右边横线上画一个勾(√)；如有错误(每行只有一个错误)，则按下列情况改正：
该行多一个词：把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉．在该行右边横线上写出该词，并也用斜线划掉。
该行缺一个词：在缺词处加一个漏字符号(/\)，在该行右边横线上写出该加的词。
该行错一个词：在错的词下划一横线，在该行右边横线上写出改正后的词。
注意：原行没有错的不要改。
My father and I am taking a camping trip in July 76.
and August. We will travel for about two months but 77.
will tour the United States and parts of the Canada. We 78.
have decided to camp because it does not spend as much 79.
as vacationing in hotels, but we had to plan carefully. I 80.
think the car what we are going to drive is very small, so 81.
we decide to take only one small suitcase for both of them 82.
and as few camping things as possibly. We will take some 83.
medicine with us prevent insects from hurting us, and also 84.
some food for picnics. I'm sure that we will have fun. 85.
76. am→are 77.but→and 78.删去第二个the 79.spend→cost
80. had→have 81.what→that或which 或者删去what 82.them→us
83.possibly→possible 84.prevent前加to 85.正确
学而优衔接教材南京大学出版社系列答案
小学课堂作业系列答案
第II卷 非选择题 (两部分，共35分)
第四部分 任务型阅读 (共10小题，每小题1分，满分10分)
请认真阅读下列短文，并根据所读内容在文后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的词。
注意：每空只填1个单词。请将答案写在答题卡上相应题号的横线上。
Do we need an “Ivy League”?
China may soon have its own “Ivy League”, with a union of top universities.
The term originally referred to an athletic conference of eight top universities in the northeastern US. The Chinese version, which was officially started in mid-October, consists of nine famous universities, including Peking, Tsinghua, Zhejiang and Fudan. The union is supposed to result in student exchange programs, recognition of academic achievements, and other joint programs.
The news of this Chinese “Ivy League” has received mixed responses from the public and press. Some negative critics have dismissed it as yet another example of the wishful copying of international practices without fully understanding them. Others say that the “Ivy League” is not necessary but that the union is a good idea, one that could promote academic development.
So what’s your opinion on a Chinese “Ivy League”? Do we need one?
Yes. Ivy League or not, nine of China’s best universities cooperating is a good thing.
These universities combining resources could create a better environment for students and for research. It could also save a lot of time and resources because it would mean fewer unnecessary investments for some of the universities.
Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons, improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities. The results could be more important than lessons and achievements.
The term “Ivy League” carries a sense of academic excellence, tradition and reputation. If borrowing such a term could encourage students’ and professors’ mental state and improve Chinese higher education, then there’s no reason not to do it.
No. Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an “Ivy League” model.
Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other. If this cooperation were associated with the “Ivy League”, it would just distract (分散) attention and resources and have a negative effect.
These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government. They’re quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn’t bring about as much potential ability as between , say, public and private, or Chinese and foreign universities.
China should find its own way to develop world-class universities instead of by copying some foreign practices. We have our own unique conditions and foreign lessons often don’t apply well here.
|
Ivy in America |
Originally referred to an athletic conference of eight famous universities in the 71 of America |
|
|
Ivy in China |
Member universities |
Nine famous universities |
|
Purposes of the union |
* To exchange students |
|
|
* To 72 the academic achievements |
||
|
* To work on joint programs |
||
|
73 from the public |
Positive side |
1. The cooperation is good for the 75 of resources and creation of a better environment. |
|
2. Students will have 76 difficulty finding jobs through the student-exchange program. |
||
|
3. The cooperation will encourage students and professors 77 . |
||
|
74 side |
1. Attention will be drawn away and 78 will be divided. |
|
|
2. The cooperation won’t have great effect because of their 79 in running universities. |
||
|
3. China should develop world-class universities in its unique way without 80 foreign practices blindly. |
第II卷 非选择题 (两部分，共35分)
第四部分 任务型阅读 (共10小题，每小题1分，满分10分)
请认真阅读下列短文，并根据所读内容在文后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的词。
注意：每空只填1个单词。请将答案写在答题卡上相应题号的横线上。
Do we need an “Ivy League”?
China may soon have its own “Ivy League”, with a union of top universities.
The term originally referred to an athletic conference of eight top universities in the northeastern US. The Chinese version, which was officially started in mid-October, consists of nine famous universities, including Peking, Tsinghua, Zhejiang and Fudan. The union is supposed to result in student exchange programs, recognition of academic achievements, and other joint programs.
The news of this Chinese “Ivy League” has received mixed responses from the public and press. Some negative critics have dismissed it as yet another example of the wishful copying of international practices without fully understanding them. Others say that the “Ivy League” is not necessary but that the union is a good idea, one that could promote academic development.
So what’s your opinion on a Chinese “Ivy League”? Do we need one?
Yes. Ivy League or not, nine of China’s best universities cooperating is a good thing.
These universities combining resources could create a better environment for students and for research. It could also save a lot of time and resources because it would mean fewer unnecessary investments for some of the universities.
Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons, improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities. The results could be more important than lessons and achievements.
The term “Ivy League” carries a sense of academic excellence, tradition and reputation. If borrowing such a term could encourage students’ and professors’ mental state and improve Chinese higher education, then there’s no reason not to do it.
No. Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an “Ivy League” model.
Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other. If this cooperation were associated with the “Ivy League”, it would just distract (分散) attention and resources and have a negative effect.
These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government. They’re quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn’t bring about as much potential ability as between , say, public and private, or Chinese and foreign universities.
China should find its own way to develop world-class universities instead of by copying some foreign practices. We have our own unique conditions and foreign lessons often don’t apply well here.
| Ivy in America | Originally referred to an athletic conference of eight famous universities in the 71 of America | ||
| Ivy in China | Member universities | Nine famous universities | |
| Purposes of the union | * To exchange students | ||
| * To 72 the academic achievements | |||
| * To work on joint programs | |||
| 73 from the public | Positive side | 1. The cooperation is good for the 75 of resources and creation of a better environment. | |
| 2. Students will have 76 difficulty finding jobs through the student-exchange program. | |||
| 3. The cooperation will encourage students and professors 77 . | |||
| ???? 74 side | 1. Attention will be drawn away and 78 will be divided. | ||
| 2. The cooperation won’t have great effect because of their 79 in running universities. | |||
| 3. China should develop world-class universities in its unique way without 80 foreign practices blindly. | |||