题目内容

【题目】第一节:短文改错(共10小题;每小题1分,满分10分)

假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文,请你修改你同桌的以下作文。文中共有10处语言错误,每句中最多有两处。错误涉及一个单词的增加、删除或修改。

增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(∧),并在其下面写上该加的词。删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在其下面写上修改后的词。

注意:1.每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;

2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。

With more and more cars come into our families, we are happy that it has greatly improved our life. But unlucky, it has also brought many problems, such heavy traffic and traffic accidents.

Traffic safety is everybody’s business. We must obey the rules. For examples, we must walk on the sidewalks. When we cross zebra–crossing, stop and look right and left, and then go across fast. Don’t play the football on the road. Beside, we can tell our parents not to drink before we drive, not to run through red lights, not to use cell-phones while driven etc.

We can say cars are coming into our life, but only when everybody thought traffic safety is his or her business can we be safe driving on roads and walk on sidewalks.

【答案】

【1】come改成coming

2】unlucky改成unluckily

3】such∧ heavy加as

4examples, example

5】play the football去掉the

6Beside改成Besides

7we改成theys

8driven改成driving

9thought改成tinks

【10walk改成walking

【解析】

试题分析:汽车成为了家庭的必需品,它使我们的生活便利很多,但同时也带来了一些问题。

【1】come→coming考查状语从句。分析句子,前半部分为with引导的原因状语,with后面接v-ing,故come改为coming。

【2】unlucky→ unluckily考查副词。还原句子为But what’s unluckily, it has also brought many problems......;副词在be动词后作表语,be动词可省略。

【3】such后面加as考查固定搭配。Such后跟名词复数,表示“这样”;such as“例如”。

【4】examples→ example考查固定搭配。For example“比如,例如”,后接逗号。

【5】去掉the考查定冠词。Play football“踢足球”,没有指定某一个篮球,不用定冠词the限定。

【6】beside→ besides考查介词。Beside“在...旁边,和...相比,超出...之外”;besides“除...之外,通常把后者包括在内”,填besides。

【7】we→ they考查代词。此处的they代指our parents,不能用we改为they。

【8】driven→ driving考查伴随结构。While后跟v-ing,表示与主动作同时发生的动作。

【9】thought→ thinks考查动词时态。根据全文可知为一般现在时,同时everybody用三人称单数,故改为thinks。

【10】walk→ walking考查关联词。And表示两者之间是并列关系,两个动词的时态应保持一致。故walk应该和driving保持一致,改为ing形式。

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.

On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha expressway Beijing section. Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.

After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CS APA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.

After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.

Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing over attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.

A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China’s twitter-like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”

Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief."

Some applaud volunteers’ actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.

Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless embodies social progress.

A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.

I think people and animals are created equal .Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.

【1】Where did the article come from ___________?

A. newspaper B. Internet

C. a TV programme D. a magazine

2Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?

A. Some net users' B. Xiaowulaitajie's

C. Liluping's D. Broken bridge's

3Which statement is TRUE according to the passage?

A. All the people think it right to save these dogs with so much money.

B. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.

C. Some volunteers support the actions to save these dogs and the people who offered their helping hands to those saved dogs.

D. 100,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网