题目内容
Both parties were highly satisfied with the results of the talks.
解析:
|
双方对会谈结果都感到非常满意。 |
(2010?冀州二模)
“A very disruptive(扰乱型的) six-year old child kicked my legs and clawed at my hand,”said one teacher. “I broke up a fight and was kicked between my legs,”said another. Many people have heard stories like this. But the situation is more worrying still and it involves parents.
Every child , regardless of the circumstances into which they are born,has the right to achieve their potential,regardless of their parents’ wealth and class. And we recognize that, as a nation,it is a long way to achieve this goal.But rights come with responsibilities and what worries people is that we are in danger of neglecting the latter.
Far too many children are behaving badly at school,even to the point of b
eing violent to staff. This is terrible enough,but it is hard to be surprised since many children are just mirroring the behavior of their parents. Too many are starting school unable to hold a knife and fork, unused to eating at a table,and unable to use the lavatory properly.
We are in danger of becoming a nation of families living separate lives under one roof. The bedroom, once a place to sleep,has become the living space for the young. Spending hours in front of computer screens, on social networking sites or being immersed in computer games, children and young people spend little time with their par
ents. Parents are unable to monitor just what their children are watching.
Schools cannot right the wrongs of society and teachers cannot become substitute parents. Both parties need to work together. Parents must be helped and given confidence to take back control. They are responsible for setting boundaries for their children’s behavior and sticking to those boundaries when the going gets tough. They are responsible for setting a go
od example to their children and for devoting that most precious of resources—time—so that children come to school ready and are willing to learn.
【小题1】In the opinion of the writer, what problem do people ignore?
| A.The school violence. |
| B.The pressure of students’ learning. |
| C.The right to achieve students potential. |
| D.the responsibilities of the students. |
| A.dissatisfied | B.unconcern | C.understanding | D.tolerance |
| A.parents and children live in their separate rooms |
| B.parents care little about children’s life at home |
| C.children don’t live with their parents in the same room |
| D.at home children live a different life from that of parents |
| A.Children’s behavior at school is worrying people |
| B.Parents expect schools to correct their children’s bad habits |
| C.There is no point in parents’ teaching children at home |
| D.Don’t blame teachers when it’s parents who are failing |
Facebook means never having to say goodbye. The social media website has earned a reputation for reconnecting old friends. Last week,a guy whom I hadn't seen since my bachelor party five years ago sent me a friend request. I accepted and waited for “Easy E” to send me a greeting of some kind. He had sought me out,after all.
I learned from his profile that he was in a relationship and had a son. However,I'm pretty sure we won't ever write wall-to-wall,let alone email each other. But he'll remain a friend of online until one of us makes a point of removing the other from his official list.
My pool of friends consists of family members,college buddies,coworkers from past and present,and friends of friends. There are 35 in all. If I spent some time uploading old email addresses,I'm confident that I could increase my friend count actually.
A person could make a mission out of reconnecting with childhood friends,former classmates,distant cousins, and those one would like to get to know better. And some people can even handle hundreds of onscreen relationships,keeping up with the daily happenings of their small army of companions. After all,there are worse fates than having too many friends.
Thanks to email,the inability to schedule face-to-face meetings no longer means a friendship must come to a close. But even with email,people will lose touch if one or both parties stop writing back. That’s normal. People move from school to school,job to job,city to city. You never have to feel guilty for breaking away.
Every day,the masterminds of Web 2.0 find new ways of making human communication easier. However,convenience can be a crutch(拐杖).Some things shouldn't be simplified. When it comes to friendship,there can be no shortcuts.
1.According to Paragraph 1,the website is famous because ________.
|
A.it has an interesting name of “Facebook” |
|
B.it helps people get in touch with old friends |
|
C.it can send people a greeting of some kind |
|
D.it reminds people of events in the past |
2.From the second paragraph we can learn that the writer ________.
|
A.would write to the friend quite often |
|
B.asked the friend to email him |
|
C.did get some information about the friend |
|
D.would keep in touch with the friend forever |
3.Which of the following statements is NOT true?
|
A.There are 35 people in the author's list of friends right now. |
|
B.The author communicates with all the 35 friends by emails. |
|
C.The list of 35 friends doesn't include the old email addresses. |
|
D.It is not difficult for the author to increase his friend count. |
4.What does the author think of the convenience of communicating online?
|
A.The technology could not keep true friendship forever. |
|
B.The social website of Facebook means nothing at all. |
|
C.There will be no ways of making real friends online. |
|
D.People will not lose friends with the help of the Facebook. |