What is all this excitement about? You a fuss about nothing. A. have made B. are making C. will make D. were making 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

题目内容

What is all this excitement about? You __ a fuss about nothing.

A. have made B. are making C. will make D. were making

练习册系列答案

大爱图书纵向解析与命题设计中考试题精选系列答案

首师金卷重点校中考模拟测试卷系列答案

相关题目

阅读理解

阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C和D项中，选出最佳选项。

　　Global warming may or may not be the great environmental crisis of the 21^st century, but-regardless of whether it is or isn't-we won't do much about it．We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments(承诺)to avoid it．But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed．

Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth,” as if merely recognizing it could put us a path to a solution．But the real truth is that we don't know enough to relieve global warming, and-without major technological breakthroughs-we can't do much about it．

　　From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9.1 billion, a 42％ increase．If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions(排放)(mainly, CO₂)will be 42％ higher in 2050．But that's too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy．We need economic growth unless we condemn the world's poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else's living standards．With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050．

　　No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom(limits on electricity usage, driving and travel)that might cut back global warming．Still, politicians want to show they're “doing something．” Consider the Kyoto Protocol(京都议定书)．It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn't．But it hasn't reduced CO₂ emissions(up about 25％ since 1990), and many signatories(签字国)didn't adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008－2012 targets．

　　The practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology．Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it．

　　The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it's really an engineering one．The inconvenient truth is that if we don't solve the engineering problem, we're helpless．

(1)

What is said about global warming in the first paragraph?
[　　]
A．	It may not prove an environmental crisis at all．
B．	It is an issue requiring worldwide commitments．
C．	Serious steps have been taken to avoid or stop it．
D．	Very little will be done to bring it under control．

(2)

According to the author's understanding, what is Al Gore's view on global warming?
[　　]
A．	It is a reality both people and politicians are unaware of．
B．	It is a phenomenon that causes us many inconveniences．
C．	It is a problem that can be solved once it is recognized．
D．	It is an area we actually have little knowledge about．

(3)

Greenhouse emissions will more than double by 2050 because of ________．
[　　]
A．	economic growth
B．	wasteful use of energy
C．	the widening gap between the rich and poor
D．	the rapid advances of science and technology

(4)

The author believes that, since the signing of the Kyoto Protocol, ________．
[　　]
A．	politicians have started to do something to better the situation
B．	few nations have adopted real tough measures to limit energy use
C．	reductions in energy consumption(消耗)have greatly cut back global warming
D．	international cooperation has contributed to solving environmental problems

(5)

What is the message the author intends to convey?
[　　]
A．	Global warming is more of a moral issue than a practical one．
B．	The ultimate solution to global warming lies in new technology．
C．	The debate over global warming will lead to technological breakthroughs．
D．	People have to give up certain material comforts to stop global warming．

The government of Norway is planning to build an unusual storage center on an island in the Arctic Ocean. The place would be large enough to hold about two million seeds. The goal is to present all crops known to scientists. The British magazine New Scientist published details of the plan last month. The structure will be designed to protect the world’s food supply against nuclear war, climate change and other possible threats. It will be built in a mountain on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen. The mountain is less than one thousand kilometers from the North Pole, the northernmost position on earth.

An international group called the Global Crop Diversity Trust is working on the project. The director of the group, Cary Fowler, spoke to New Scientist. He said the project would let the world rebuild agriculture if, in his word, “the worst came to the worst”. Norway is expected to start work next year. The project is expected to cost three million dollars. Workers will drill deep in the side of a sandstone mountain. Temperatures in the area never rise above 0??C. The seeds will be protected behind concrete walls a meter thick and high-security door.

The magazine report says the collection will represent the products of ten thousand years of farming. Most of the seeds at first will come from collections at seed banks in Africa, Asia and Latin America. To last a long time, seeds need to be kept in very low temperatures. Workers will not be present al the time. But they plan to replace the air inside the storage space each winter. Winter temperatures on the island are about eighteen degrees below 0??C. The cold weather would protect the seeds even if the air could not be replaced.

Mr. Fowler says the proposed structure will be the world’s most secure gene bank. He says the plant seeds would only be used when all other seeds are gone for some reason. Norway first proposed the idea in the 1980s. But security concerns delayed the plan. At that time, the Soviet Union was meeting in Rome of the Food and Agriculture Organization.

The project is meant to ______.

A．increase the world’s food output in the future

B．carry out some scientific experiments on plant genes

C．protect crop seeds from dying out in case of possible disasters

D．build an exhibition centre of the world’s plant seeds

Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the above passage?

A．The government of Norway will perform the project alone.

B．Seeds to be collected there were produced ten thousands years ago.

C．Spitsbergen is chosen because it is free of the threat unclear war forever.

D．Temperature is a major consideration when choosing the storage place.

We can infer from the text that _______.

A．People will get newly-developed seeds from the center every year.

B．The storage center will greatly promote world agriculture

C．Norway had meant to build the storage centre about 20 years before.

D．There haven’t been any seed storage centres in the world before.

What is probably the best title of the passage?

A．The Best Place to Store Seeds B．Noah’s Ark（诺亚方舟）of Plant Seeds in Plan

C．Concerns of World Food Supply D．A New Way to Feed the World

Directions: Read the following passage. Answer the questions according to the information given in the passage and required words limit. Write your answers on your answer sheet.

Few places have as much ancient history and modern knowledge to offer to students as Egypt. In addition to being the site of many of the world’s greatest wonders, Egypt also hosts two major religious institutions. Al-Azhar University is one of the oldest Islamic institutions for higher studies. The head of Al-Azhar is traditionally regarded as the ruler of Sunni Muslims all over the world.

Al-Azhar University had long been known as the most archaic university in the world until 2004, when archaeologists unearthed the site of what was believed to be the first ever ivory tower in the world in the northern seaside city of Alexandria.

What the archaeological team found were 13 lecture halls that could accommodate up to 5,000 students each. These lecture halls are believed to be the University of Alexandria, home of famous Greek scholars like Archimedes and Euclid during the ancient city’s golden era.

This discovery shows that Egypt was a centre for education and learning in the early world civilizations. Its tradition of scholarship was evident even from the Pharaonic Age（法老时代）, which boasted engineering wonders such as the pyramids as well as the scientific wonder of mummies, all of which still exist tod ay.

During the Islamic Age, Egypt became the regional academic centre for Islamic study and Arabic language and literature. Her popularity with scholars from all over the world grew with the establishment of Al-Azhar University in Cairo, in 975.

Today, it remains a popular destination for international scholars, especially those from the Arab world, Africa, Asia and Europe, but like most modern Egyptian universities, Al-Azhar has been equipped with the latest technologies to cope with new demands from the modern world, and is an ideal place for students from all over the world.

Find in the passage a word closest in meaning to the underlined word “ archaic” .(one word)

Why has Al-Azhar been equipped with the latest technologies?(no more than 9 word)

What is the passage mainly about ?(no more than 6 word)

What is the writer’s purpose of writing this passage?(no more than 9 word)

Global warming may or may not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but — regardless of whether it is or isn’t — we won’t do much about it. We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments(承诺) to avoid it. But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed.

Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth,” as if merely recognizing it could put us a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don’t know enough to relieve global warming, and — without major technological breakthroughs — we can’t do much about it.

From 2003 to 2050, the world’s population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9.1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions(排放) (mainly, CO2) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that’s too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world’s poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else’s living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.

No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom (limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they’re “doing something.” Consider the Kyoto Protocol(京都议定书). It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn’t. But it hasn’t reduced CO2 emissions (up about 25% since 1990), and many signatories(签字国) didn’t adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012 targets.

The practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology. Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it.

The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it’s really an engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don’t solve the engineering problem, we’re helpless.

46. What is said about global warming in the first paragraph?

A. It may not prove an environmental crisis at all.

B. It is an issue requiring worldwide commitments.

C. Serious steps have been taken to avoid or stop it.

D. Very little will be done to bring it under control.

47. According to the author’s understanding, what is Al Gore’s view on global warming?

A. It is a reality both people and politicians are unaware of.

B. It is a phenomenon that causes us many inconveniences.

C. It is a problem that can be solved once it is recognized.

D. It is an area we actually have little knowledge about.

48. Greenhouse emissions will more than double by 2050 because of ________.

A. economic growth

B. wasteful use of energy

C. the widening gap between the rich and poor

D. the rapid advances of science and technology

49. The author believes that, since the signing of the Kyoto Protocol, ________.

A. politicians have started to do something to better the situation

B. few nations have adopted real tough measures to limit energy use

C. reductions in energy consumption (消耗) have greatly cut back global warming

D. international cooperation has contributed to solving environmental problems

50. What is the message the author intends to convey?

A. Global warming is more of a moral issue than a practical one.

B. The ultimate solution to global warming lies in new technology.

C. The debate over global warming will lead to technological breakthroughs.

D. People have to give up certain material comforts to stop global warming.

Global warming may or may not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but-regardless of whether it is or isn't-we won't do much about it.

Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth", as if merely recognizing it could put us on a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don't know enough to relieve global warming, and-without major technological breakthroughs-we can't do much about it.

From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9.1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, C02) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that's too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world's poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else's living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.

No government will adopt strict restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom(limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they're "doing something". Consider the Kyoto Protocol (京都议定书). It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn't. But it hasn't reduced C02 emissions (up about 25% since 1990), and many signatories (签字国 )didn't adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012targets.

The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it's really an engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don’t solve the engineering problem, we’re helpless.

47. According to the author's understanding, what is Al Gore's view on global warming?