Homebuyers nationwide are watching housing prices going up, up, and up. “How high can they go?” is the question on everyone’s lips? “As long as interest rates stay around 5 percent, there’s no telling,” remarked one realtor in Santa Monica, California.

“It’s crazy,” said Tim, who is looking for a house near the beach. “In 1993, I bought my first place, a two-bedroom condominium in Venice, for $70,000. My friends thought then that I was overpaying. Five years later, I had to move. I sold it for $230,000, which was a nice profit. Last year, while visiting friends here, I saw in the local paper that the exact same condo was for sale for $510,000!”

It is a seller’s market. Homebuyers feel like they have to offer at least 10 percent more than the asking price. Donna, a new owner of a one-bedroom condo in Venice Beach, said, “That’s what I did. I told the owner that whatever anyone offers you, I’ll give you $20,000 more, under the table, so you don’t have to pay your realtor any of it. I was tired of looking.”

Tim says he hopes he doesn’t get that desperate. “Whether you decide to buy or decide not to buy, you still feel like you made the wrong decision. If you buy, you feel like you overpaid. If you don’t buy, you want to kick yourself for passing up a great opportunity.”

Everyone says the bubble(泡沫) has to burst sometime, but everyone hopes it will burst the day after they sell their house. Even government officials have no idea what the future will bring. “All we can say is that, inevitably, these things go in cycles,” said the state director of housing. “What goes up must come down. But, as we all know, housing prices always stay up a little higher than they go down. So you can’t lose over the long run. Twenty years down the road, your house is always worth more than you paid for it.”

60.If Tim had sold his flat last year, he could have earned          .

         A.$ 510,000  B.$ 440,000  C.$ 280,000  D.$ 160,000

61.Donna paid another $ 20,000 to the owner secretly because          .

         A.she felt like offering 10% more B.secret money made low price

         C.the owner asked for the money         D.she was bored with bargaining

62.We can infer from Tim’s words in paragraph 4 that           .

         A.homebuyers feel hesitate facing rising house prices

         B.buying a house is always a great opportunity

         C.homebuyers never make the right decision

         D.both sellers and buyers become desperate

63.What is the author’s opinion about the housing bubble?          

        A.It is something everyone hates to see

         B.Only experts know when it will burst

         C.It is unavoidable in the regular circles

         D.It usually stays for about twenty years

(B)

People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not, or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.

Social scientists are, of course, extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet, but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect, the two approaches are very different from one another, and there is a great deal of debate between proponents of each theory.The controversy is often referred to as “nature/nurture”.

Those who support the “nature” side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological and genetic factors.That our environment has little, if anything, to do with our abilities, characteristics, and behavior is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme, this theory maintains that our behavior is predetermined to such a degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.

Proponents of the “nurture” theory, or, as they are often called, behaviorists, claimed that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act.A behaviorist, B.F.Skinner, sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists’ view of the human being is quite mechanistic; they maintain that, like machines, humans’ respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.

Either of these theories cannot yet fully explain human behavior.In fact, it is quite likely that the key to our behavior lies somewhere between these two extremes.That the controversy will continue for a long time is certain.

69.Which of the following statements would the supporters of the “nature” theory agree with?

       A.A person’s instincts have little effect on his actions.

       B.Environment is important in determining a person’s behavior and personality.

       C.Biological reasons have a strong influence on how we act.

       D.The behaviorists’ view correctly explains how we act.

70.Concerning the nature/nurture controversy, the writer of this article____________.

       A.supports the nature theory

       B.supports the nurture theory

       C.believes both are completely wrong

       D.thinks that the correct explanation of human behavior will take ideas from both theories.

71.In the United States, Black people often score below White people on intelligence tests.With this in mind, which of the following statements is NOT true?

       A.Nature proponents would say that Whites are genetically superior to Blacks.

       B.Supporters of the nature theory would say that Whites score well because they have a superior environment.

       C.Behaviorists would say that Blacks often lack the educational and environmental advantages that Whites enjoy.

       D.Nurture proponents would disagree that Blacks are biologically inferior to Whites.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网