摘要: Subsidies. News report. Eighty/80.

网址:http://m.1010jiajiao.com/timu3_id_3173437[举报]

 

   On Wednesday, the Chinese government, decided to increase its medical subsidies(补贴)  for farmers from 10 Yuan (US$1.23) to 20 Yuan (US$2.47) a head a year from 2006.

   As part of the country's healthcare reform programme, the co-operative rural (农村)medical system was first introduced in 2003 to set up self-help among farmers on a voluntary basis.  Due to insufficient government input to finance hospitals that are mostly State-owned, the country's healthcare reform has largely turned out to be a failure, adding hugely to the financial burden on the public.

While everyone complains about quickly-rising medical costs, rural residents are suffering more than their urban(城镇) cousins because of a lack of money, as well as not being able to enjoy high quality health services. At present, farmers earn on average only one-third of what urban residents make. Most of the country's medical resources are located in cities even though rural residents make up two-thirds of the population.

  Poor health conditions make it more difficult to help farmers get out of poverty; and poverty, in turn, refuses farmers the chance to improve their health. To end this vicious circle, policy-makers tried the co-operative medical system, with a small sum of central and local financial support for each rural participant. But the system has proved to be less than perfect. Due to the limited financial input, the programme still does not benefit the majority of farmers in a significant way. This has reduced many farmers' enthusiasm for participating. A high percentage of involvement is of course a precondition for such a system.

  The central government intends to expand the programme into a national medical system by 2008. Increasing government subsidies is a necessary step to make the co-operative medical system more attractive to farmers. But an increase of 10 Yuan for each participant is surely far from enough to perfect the system. The total cost is not particularly heavy compared to the rapid growth in government revenue(财政).

   Clearly, policy-makers are becoming increasingly aware of how urgent the narrowing of the development gap between rural and urban areas really is. Besides economic policies to push the rural economy, large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education is badly needed.

1. Compared with that in 2006, what will be the rate of coming increase in China’s medical subsidies for farmers?

         A. 100%                      B. 50%                        C. 200%                     D. 150%

2. What is the reason for the failure in the country’s healthcare reform?

         A. Bad management system.          

         B. The government didn’t input enough money to support hospitals that are mostly

state-owned.

         C. The health conditions in the country is too bad.

         D. There are too many farmers that need medical care.

3. What is needed to narrow the development gap between rural and urban areas?

         ①. Large amount of government investment in economy.

         ②. Large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education.

         ③. Economic policies to push the rural economy

④. A high percentage of farmers’ involvement in the medical system

⑤. A better management system

A. ①②③    B.  ②③④                   C. ①②③④⑤          D. ②③

4. Why are many farmers not enthusiastic in joining the co-operative medical system?

         A. It doesn’t benefit most of the farmers in an effective way.

         B. They cannot spare the needed money to join the programme.

         C. They don’t believe in the system.

         D. They don’t think it necessary.

5. What can be inferred from the last but one paragraph?

         A. An increase of 10 Yuan in medical subsidies for each person is not enough.

         B. The government can afford to increase the medical subsidies for farmers.

         C. The government will get farmers of the whole country involved in a medical system by 2008. 

         D. If the government increase subsidies, more farmers are likely to join the medical system.

 

查看习题详情和答案>>


  On Wednesday, the Chinese government, decided to increase its medical subsidies(补贴)  for farmers from 10 Yuan (US$1.23) to 20 Yuan (US$2.47) a head a year from 2006.
   As part of the country's healthcare reform programme, the co-operative rural (农村)medical system was first introduced in 2003 to set up self-help among farmers on a voluntary basis.  Due to insufficient government input to finance hospitals that are mostly State-owned, the country's healthcare reform has largely turned out to be a failure, adding hugely to the financial burden on the public.
While everyone complains about quickly-rising medical costs, rural residents are suffering more than their urban(城镇) cousins because of a lack of money, as well as not being able to enjoy high quality health services. At present, farmers earn on average only one-third of what urban residents make. Most of the country's medical resources are located in cities even though rural residents make up two-thirds of the population.
  Poor health conditions make it more difficult to help farmers get out of poverty; and poverty, in turn, refuses farmers the chance to improve their health. To end this vicious circle, policy-makers tried the co-operative medical system, with a small sum of central and local financial support for each rural participant. But the system has proved to be less than perfect. Due to the limited financial input, the programme still does not benefit the majority of farmers in a significant way. This has reduced many farmers' enthusiasm for participating. A high percentage of involvement is of course a precondition for such a system.
  The central government intends to expand the programme into a national medical system by 2008. Increasing government subsidies is a necessary step to make the co-operative medical system more attractive to farmers. But an increase of 10 Yuan for each participant is surely far from enough to perfect the system. The total cost is not particularly heavy compared to the rapid growth in government revenue(财政).
   Clearly, policy-makers are becoming increasingly aware of how urgent the narrowing of the development gap between rural and urban areas really is. Besides economic policies to push the rural economy, large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education is badly needed.
1. Compared with that in 2006, what will be the rate of coming increase in China’s medical subsidies for farmers?
A. 100%               B. 50%                 C. 200%                      D. 150%
2. What is the reason for the failure in the country’s healthcare reform?
A. Bad management system.        
B. The government didn’t input enough money to support hospitals that are mostly
state-owned.
C. The health conditions in the country is too bad.
D. There are too many farmers that need medical care.
3. What is needed to narrow the development gap between rural and urban areas?
①. Large amount of government investment in economy.
②. Large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education.
③. Economic policies to push the rural economy
④. A high percentage of farmers’ involvement in the medical system
⑤. A better management system
A. ①②③ B. ②③④             C. ①②③④⑤          D. ②③
4. Why are many farmers not enthusiastic in joining the co-operative medical system?
A. It doesn’t benefit most of the farmers in an effective way.
B. They cannot spare the needed money to join the programme.
C. They don’t believe in the system.
D. They don’t think it necessary.
5. What can be inferred from the last but one paragraph?
A. An increase of 10 Yuan in medical subsidies for each person is not enough.
B. The government can afford to increase the medical subsidies for farmers.
C. The government will get farmers of the whole country involved in a medical system by 2008. 
D. If the government increase subsidies, more farmers are likely to join the medical system.

查看习题详情和答案>>

   On Wednesday, the Chinese government, decided to increase its medical subsidies(补贴)  for farmers from 10 Yuan (US$1.23) to 20 Yuan (US$2.47) a head a year from 2006.

   As part of the country's healthcare reform programme, the co-operative rural (农村)medical system was first introduced in 2003 to set up self-help among farmers on a voluntary basis.  Due to insufficient government input to finance hospitals that are mostly State-owned, the country's healthcare reform has largely turned out to be a failure, adding hugely to the financial burden on the public.

While everyone complains about quickly-rising medical costs, rural residents are suffering more than their urban(城镇) cousins because of a lack of money, as well as not being able to enjoy high quality health services. At present, farmers earn on average only one-third of what urban residents make. Most of the country's medical resources are located in cities even though rural residents make up two-thirds of the population.

  Poor health conditions make it more difficult to help farmers get out of poverty; and poverty, in turn, refuses farmers the chance to improve their health. To end this vicious circle, policy-makers tried the co-operative medical system, with a small sum of central and local financial support for each rural participant. But the system has proved to be less than perfect. Due to the limited financial input, the programme still does not benefit the majority of farmers in a significant way. This has reduced many farmers' enthusiasm for participating. A high percentage of involvement is of course a precondition for such a system.

  The central government intends to expand the programme into a national medical system by 2008. Increasing government subsidies is a necessary step to make the co-operative medical system more attractive to farmers. But an increase of 10 Yuan for each participant is surely far from enough to perfect the system. The total cost is not particularly heavy compared to the rapid growth in government revenue(财政).

   Clearly, policy-makers are becoming increasingly aware of how urgent the narrowing of the development gap between rural and urban areas really is. Besides economic policies to push the rural economy, large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education is badly needed.

1. Compared with that in 2006, what will be the rate of coming increase in China’s medical subsidies for farmers?

       A. 100%               B. 50%                 C. 200%                      D. 150%

2. What is the reason for the failure in the country’s healthcare reform?

       A. Bad management system.        

       B. The government didn’t input enough money to support hospitals that are mostly

state-owned.

       C. The health conditions in the country is too bad.

       D. There are too many farmers that need medical care.

3. What is needed to narrow the development gap between rural and urban areas?

       ①. Large amount of government investment in economy.

       ②. Large amount of government investment on improving rural healthcare and education.

       ③. Economic policies to push the rural economy

④. A high percentage of farmers’ involvement in the medical system

⑤. A better management system

A. ①②③ B.  ②③④             C. ①②③④⑤          D. ②③

4. Why are many farmers not enthusiastic in joining the co-operative medical system?

       A. It doesn’t benefit most of the farmers in an effective way.

       B. They cannot spare the needed money to join the programme.

       C. They don’t believe in the system.

       D. They don’t think it necessary.

5. What can be inferred from the last but one paragraph?

       A. An increase of 10 Yuan in medical subsidies for each person is not enough.

       B. The government can afford to increase the medical subsidies for farmers.

       C. The government will get farmers of the whole country involved in a medical system by 2008. 

       D. If the government increase subsidies, more farmers are likely to join the medical system.

查看习题详情和答案>>

阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中,选出最佳选项。

  The British aren't having as many children as they used to.One reason is that people are having children much older than before, meaning they have fewer years in which they can have them.After years at university, they need a few years of work experience before they can get the job they want.They might then get married, but it's incredibly expensive to buy a house in the UK.

  The above explains why young British people now don't move out of their parents’ home until they are around 30 years old on average.It is not until they are 30 that they can afford their own home.Increasingly, it is not until that age that they can afford to get married and start a new life in a new home.It's only after this age that many young people start thinking about having a child.

  So a British person manages to get a job, get a home and get married.Why isn't he or she then having at least two children on average? The main reason is that it is quite expensive to bring up a child in the UK.Why is it expensive? Well, these days, both parents need to work just to pay for their home and living expenses.Because both parents are at work, that means they then need to pay someone to look after their child during the day.Paying for this childcare is nearly always expensive.

  The recent financial crisis is making things even harder for families, since unemployment is rising and even fewer people can afford to have children.With so much pressure on families, is it any surprise that the divorce rate is so high?

  So what is Britain doing to try and save the British family? The government is trying to make it cheaper to have children.For example, there have been increases in money families can claim from the state each month.Also, there are increasing government subsidies for nursery schools, so that parents do not need to pay so much for child care.

  The government is also trying to reduce the number of hours British parents have to work to earn enough money to pay their bills.If parents didn't have to work so many hours, they'd have more time to spend with their children and wouldn't need to spend so much on childcare.On average, a Briton works 49 hours a week, which is the most in Europe.The state is now considering introducing laws to encourage companies to improve their employees’ work-life balance.Let's hope they’re not too late to save the British family.Otherwise, the British will always be too tired, and won't have enough time and money, to have children.

(1)

Young British people live in their parents’ home until around 30 because ________.

[  ]

A.

They are allowed to get married at 30

B.

they can't find jobs to support themselves

C.

they can't afford a house of their own until then

D.

they enjoy family life with their parents

(2)

The British are now having fewer children than before for all the following reasons EXCEPT that ________.

[  ]

A.

they have fewer years to have children

B.

they live much shorter lives than before

C.

it is more expensive to bring up a child

D.

people are losing their jobs because of the recent financial crisis

(3)

To make it cheaper to have children, the British government is ________.

[  ]

A.

bringing down prices

B.

raising the salaries of parents

C.

reducing family income tax

D.

increasing subsidies for families and nursery schools

(4)

It can be inferred from the text that ________.

[  ]

A.

with long work hours, it is hard for British parents to balance life and work

B.

more and more families in Britain are breaking up because they are having fewer children

C.

among Europeans, British people work hardest and earn the least

D.

childcare takes up too much energy and time for the British

(5)

The underlined word “subsidies” in Paragraph 5 means ________.

[  ]

A.

food paid by the government

B.

school buildings for poor students

C.

free transportation

D.

money from the government to benefit the public

查看习题详情和答案>>

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网