网址：http://m.1010jiajiao.com/timu3_id_2569154[举报]
Beijing's broadened ban on smoking in public places took effect Thursday, adding force to the effort to hold a smoke-free Olympics.
The new rules extend existing anti-smoking regulations to more places, including fitness centers, cultural relic sites, offices, meeting rooms, dining halls, toilets and lifts. Restaurants, Internet cafes, parks, and waiting halls at airports, railway stations and coach stations are required to set up smoking areas. Hotels will have to offer smoke-free rooms or floors, but the regulations do not specify a proportion.
However, some restaurant owners have complained that it would be difficult to have a separate smoking room as required by the new regulations. "We plan to issue specific rules to solve this problem as soon as possible," Rao Yingsheng, vice-director of the Beijing Committee for Patriotic Public Health Campaign, was quoted by the Beijing News as saying Thursday. He said small restaurants without a separate room should set aside at least 70 percent of their area for non-smokers. He also said customers and restaurant owners would be asked for their thoughts on the new rule.
Local authorities dispatched about 100,000 inspectors to make sure the ban was being enforced Thursday. Everyone has the right to dissuade people from smoking in public places, Liu Zejun, who works for the Beijing committee, said. "Citizens are encouraged to expose those who refuse to obey the rule by calling the free telephone line 12320," Liu said.
People caught smoking in forbidden areas will be fined 10 yuan ($1.40), while enterprises and institutions that violate(违反) the ban will face fines of between 1,000 yuan and 5,000 yuan. Smoking was forbidden in hospitals, kindergartens, schools, museums, sports venues and other places before the new regulations took effect. From Oct 1 last year, the city also banned smoking in its 66,000 cabs, and imposed fines of 100 yuan to 200 yuan on drivers caught smoking in taxis.
China has pledged a cigarette-free, green Olympics. This year's event will be the first non-smoking Olympic Games since the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), of which China is a signatory(签名人), went into effect in 2005.
- 1.
The passage mainly tells us _____.
- A.There will be more places where smoking is forbidden.
- B.More people should give up smoking.
- C.Broadened ban on smoking in public places took effect in order to set up a non-smoking Olympic Games.
- D.Those who smoke at public places will be fined.
- A.
- 2.
Smoking is _____ at airports, railway stations or coach stations etc.
- A.forbidden
- B.allowed
- C.allowed at it’s smoking areas
- D.we don’t know
- A.
- 3.
Which of the following is Not true according to the passage?
- A.Hotels will have to offer smoke-free rooms.
- B.Smoking is not allowed in most restaurants.
- C.12320 is a free telephone line to expose those who smoke at public places.
- D.People caught smoking in forbidden areas will be fined.
- A.
- 4.
If a taxi driver smokes in his cab, he will probably be fined _____ .
- A.10 yuan
- B.50 yuan
- C.120 yuan
- D.1000 yuan
- A.
完形填空
It is well known that smoking causes harmful side effects; however, we see thousands of smoking. Not only the elderly; 1 young people and children are under smoke, in order to show they 2 ——maybe smoking is a 3 of being a grown up. 4 smoking has become a serious social problem.
Our government has 5 called on people to 6 smoking. As a result, many have given up smoking. 7 , a lot more people are joining the ranks of smokers. 8 it is far from enough to 9 the matter to slogans(口号). 10 is necessary is a campaign 11 smoking.
First, I suggest, regulations 12 be made to forbid smoking in public places. In many cities smoking is not 13 in cinemas or in theatres. Smokers have to abide by(遵守)it, 14 they'll be fined. Why can't we 15 this as a good example to develop it in other public places 16 on the trains, in the offices, hotels and so on?
Secondly, stricter measures 17 taken to impose a tax 18 smokers for causing pollution. 19 we'll continue the fight against smoking in the 20 that one day smokers will fully realize the health dangers they face.
1．
[ ]
2．
[ ]
3．
[ ]
4．
[ ]
5．
[ ]
6．
[ ]
7．
[ ]
8．
[ ]
9．
[ ]
10．
[ ]
11．
[ ]
12．
[ ]
13．
[ ]
14．
[ ]
15．
[ ]
16．
[ ]
17．
[ ]
18．
[ ]
19．
[ ]
20．
[ ]
完形填空
It is well known that smoking causes harmful side effects; however, we see thousands of smoking. Not only the elderly; 1 young people and children are under smoke, in order to show they 2 ——maybe smoking is a 3 of being a grown up. 4 smoking has become a serious social problem.
Our government has 5 called on people to 6 smoking. As a result, many have given up smoking. 7 , a lot more people are joining the ranks of smokers. 8 it is far from enough to 9 the matter to slogans(口号). 10 is necessary is a campaign 11 smoking.
First, I suggest, regulations 12 be made to forbid smoking in public places. In many cities smoking is not 13 in cinemas or in theatres. Smokers have to abide by(遵守)it, 14 they'll be fined. Why can't we 15 this as a good example to develop it in other public places 16 on the trains, in the offices, hotels and so on?
Secondly, stricter measures 17 taken to impose a tax 18 smokers for causing pollution. 19 we'll continue the fight against smoking in the 20 that one day smokers will fully realize the health dangers they face.
(1)
[ ]
(2)
[ ]
(3)
[ ]
(4)
[ ]
(5)
[ ]
(6)
[ ]
(7)
[ ]
(8)
[ ]
(9)
[ ]
(10)
[ ]
(11)
[ ]
(12)
[ ]
(13)
[ ]
(14)
[ ]
(15)
[ ]
(16)
[ ]
(17)
[ ]
(18)
[ ]
(19)
[ ]
(20)
[ ]
某网站上组织了一次讨论，其中David, Joe, Sophie, Michael与Bauer的观点颇具代表性。以下是他们各自的观点。阅读下面发表在该网站上的6段留言（A、B、C、D、E和F），选择与其观点一致的表述，并在答题纸上将该项标号涂黑。选项中有一项是多途选项。
1.David believes people shouldn't smoke in public places as it harms others.
2.Joe insists that smokers should put the cigarette ends where they should go．
3.Sophie holds that this question should call for a further argument．
4.Michael thinks cigarette taxes should be raised for free healthcare for nonsmokers．
5.Bauer thinks that victims of second - hand smoking should leave smoking areas to avoid harm．
A
The stupid thing is, I often see people smoking and then they throw the cigarette ends away from them when they have finished, not even stopping them but it just seems like once they have finished, they don't want it near them, perhaps they ought to have to carry their own ash trays in their pockets．
B
In many places, there are no non - smoking bars or restaurants．Unless people refuse to go out with friends who smoke, they cannot avoid passive smoking．Society accepts that adults can decide to harm themselves．so long as they do not harm others．This is why the suggestion is not arguing that people should be banned from smoking in private．Passive smokers do choose to breathe in other people's smoke．If they do not want to smoke passively, they do not need to go to places where smoking is allowed．There is therefore no reason to prevent smoking in public．
C
I'm only for smoking because not only do nice people and many friends and family of mine smoke, but this debate needs someone to take the side of the smoker．Otherwise we're just picking on a set of people．The only comment so far for smoking has been that clever one about how they pay for it．Smoking has its good points, whether it is giving job opportunities to millions of people, or getting extra breaks at work．Anyway, I do have a lot to say against smoking too, but again, debate．
D
What I care about is whether people can get free healthcare．Some people deliberately take dangerous toxins into their bodies because they're "addicted" while there are other people like my uncle who died of lung cancer and he never smoked in his life．It makes you wonder why cigarettes are so cheap．Surely all the taxes from cigarettes ought to go to help people who don't smoke．Perhaps we ought to sort things out．
E
Completely against it．I work in a bar and 1 get so sick of coming home smelling like a bonfire． And if that isn't enough, I'm probably going to get lung cancer from those idiots that decide to excite themselves．However,! do understand that for some older smokers it is a habit because they may have been smoking long before they knew it was bad for them．I do think there's no excuse for my generation to do it though and if they want to die, then go to do it in your own home．
F
Phil and I had a good argument today in the pub．He made the comment, "If he wants to smoke and kill himself, he can!", about which I said "You want to get on your motorbike and risk death, fine", which are basically the same thing．He made the point that he's a good driver and it's not his fault if he gets hurt, but at the end of the day, his fault or not, he knows he could get killed, and he's still taking the risk of being on a bike．I think it's a sick thing to say, being honest! If people want to put something in their mouth and blow on it, they should be allowed without having things like that being said ! It's a free country!
查看习题详情和答案>>
某网站上组织了一次讨论，其中David, Joe, Sophie, Michael与Bauer的观点颇具代表性。以下是他们各自的观点。阅读下面发表在该网站上的6段留言（A、B、C、D、E和F），选择与其观点一致的表述，并在答题纸上将该项标号涂黑。选项中有一项是多途选项。
【小题1】David believes people shouldn't smoke in public places as it harms others.
【小题2】Joe insists that smokers should put the cigarette ends where they should go．
【小题3】Sophie holds that this question should call for a further argument．
【小题4】Michael thinks cigarette taxes should be raised for free healthcare for nonsmokers．
【小题5】Bauer thinks that victims of second - hand smoking should leave smoking areas to avoid harm．
A
The stupid thing is, I often see people smoking and then they throw the cigarette ends away from them when they have finished, not even stopping them but it just seems like once they have finished, they don't want it near them, perhaps they ought to have to carry their own ash trays in their pockets．
B
In many places, there are no non - smoking bars or restaurants．Unless people refuse to go out with friends who smoke, they cannot avoid passive smoking．Society accepts that adults can decide to harm themselves．so long as they do not harm others．This is why the suggestion is not arguing that people should be banned from smoking in private．Passive smokers do choose to breathe in other people's smoke．If they do not want to smoke passively, they do not need to go to places where smoking is allowed．There is therefore no reason to prevent smoking in public．
C
I'm only for smoking because not only do nice people and many friends and family of mine smoke, but this debate needs someone to take the side of the smoker．Otherwise we're just picking on a set of people．The only comment so far for smoking has been that clever one about how they pay for it．Smoking has its good points, whether it is giving job opportunities to millions of people, or getting extra breaks at work．Anyway, I do have a lot to say against smoking too, but again, debate．
D
What I care about is whether people can get free healthcare．Some people deliberately take dangerous toxins into their bodies because they're "addicted" while there are other people like my uncle who died of lung cancer and he never smoked in his life．It makes you wonder why cigarettes are so cheap．Surely all the taxes from cigarettes ought to go to help people who don't smoke．Perhaps we ought to sort things out．
E
Completely against it．I work in a bar and 1 get so sick of coming home smelling like a bonfire． And if that isn't enough, I'm probably going to get lung cancer from those idiots that decide to excite themselves．However,! do understand that for some older smokers it is a habit because they may have been smoking long before they knew it was bad for them．I do think there's no excuse for my generation to do it though and if they want to die, then go to do it in your own home．
F
Phil and I had a good argument today in the pub．He made the comment, "If he wants to smoke and kill himself, he can!", about which I said "You want to get on your motorbike and risk death, fine", which are basically the same thing．He made the point that he's a good driver and it's not his fault if he gets hurt, but at the end of the day, his fault or not, he knows he could get killed, and he's still taking the risk of being on a bike．I think it's a sick thing to say, being honest! If people want to put something in their mouth and blow on it, they should be allowed without having things like that being said ! It's a free country!