摘要:forbid ( )certainly

网址:http://m.1010jiajiao.com/timu3_id_2452948[举报]

阅读理解

     More and more people are annoyed at the continually rising house prices.They want to know
who is to blame for it.Local governments, developers and speculators (投机商) share a vested (既
得的) interest in it.People who are really in need of homes are most likely to suffer heavy losses.
     Many local governments depend on selling land to keep its normal operation.The higher land
prices, the more money.Therefore, developers back the local governments by buying land at high
prices.In return, the governments make favorable policies to help the developers.For example, drive
all the possible home buyers to this nasty (危险的) market.They even encourage large numbers of
speculators to catch more people.
     Rising house prices have already become the fence which divides the Chinese society.It has
caused widespread dissatisfaction.The government will lose the support of the common people if
leaving house prices out of control.Besides, rising house prices will stop us building the new
countryside as the present policy actually forbid people to flow freely from cities to the countryside.
     Collecting taxes on houses can fundamentally solve this problem.On one hand, it will discourage
the speculators.On the other hand, it will offer a stable tax resource apart from reducing the sales
cost of the developers.Secondly, stop the developers selling the houses before completion.If so, the
developers will certainly try their best to sell all their houses once completed.And this will also lower
speculators' expectation of price rising, which will decrease speculations.

查看习题详情和答案>>
阅读理解。
     More and more people are annoyed at the continually rising house prices. They want to know who is to blame for it. Local governments, developers and speculators (投机商) share a vested (既得的) interest in it. People who are really in need of homes are most likely to suffer heavy losses.
     Many local governments depend on selling land to keep its normal operation. The higher land prices,
the more money. Therefore, developers back the local governments by buying land at high prices. In
return, the governments make favorable policies to help the developers. For example, drive all the possible home buyers to this nasty (危险的) market. They even encourage large numbers of speculators to catch
more people.
     Rising house prices have already become the fence which divides the Chinese society. It has caused
widespread dissatisfaction. The government will lose the support of the common people if leaving house
prices out of control. Besides, rising house prices will stop us building the new countryside as the present
policy actually forbid people to flow freely from cities to the countryside.
     Collecting taxes on houses can fundamentally solve this problem. On one hand, it will discourage the
speculators. On the other hand, it will offer a stable tax resource apart from reducing the sales cost of the
developers. Secondly, stop the developers selling the houses before completion. If so, the developers will certainly try their best to sell all their houses once completed. And this will also lower speculators'
expectation of price rising, which will decrease speculations.
1. The only victims of rising house prices are _____.
A. governments  
B. real home buyers
C. developers  
D. speculators
2. The local governments reward the developers by _____.
A. offering enough land  
B. allowing sales in advance
C. providing enough buyers  
D. making favorable policies
3. We can infer from the passage that continually rising house prices will _____.
A. benefit the government
B. draw more home buyers
C. help the housing industry develop soundly
D. affect the sound development of the Chinese society
4. Collecting taxes on houses has all the following effects except _____.
A. making the developers do their best to sell their houses
B. cutting down speculations
C. supplying a stable tax resource for the government
D. decreasing the sales cost
查看习题详情和答案>>

Elaine Yu Yee-nee, 15, Creative Secondary School
Lockers are designed in a way to hide their contents for a reason. Otherwise, they’d have open fronts like cupboards. Searching students’ lockers would be total invasion(侵犯) of privacy. Having a locker is more than having a place to store your stuff. A locker also gives you the freedom to keep certain things hidden. These can include harmless personal items like diaries, letters and photos. Searching lockers could discomfit students and others might make fun of them.
Yes, lockers are school property(财产). But that doesn’t give schools the right to inspect lockers as they please. While students are using lockers, they have the right to keep their contents private. Teachers could ask for permission to take a look inside a student’s locker and if the student is OK with that, then it would be fine. Searching students’ lockers without their permission would result in the loss of trust.
I doubt that students who have something dangerous to hide, such as weapons or drugs, would put them in their lockers. They would not want to risk being caught so easily.
Giving schools the right to search lockers would not help catch those who commit crimes. But it would certainly create an environment in which students would be embarrassed to have their belongings shown in public for no good reason.
Ronald Ling Pak-ki, 20, University of Hong Kong
Many students see their lockers as personal property. They would never agree that schools should have the right to inspect their lockers. But I think schools have an absolute right to do so.
It is the schools that actually own the lockers. Students just use them to store some of their things safely and conveniently. There are clear rules on what items students can and cannot keep in their lockers. Schools have both the duty and the right to check if students are following the rules.
I don’t think school authorities would decide to search a student’s locker unless they felt the need to do so. They might, for instance, suspect students of hiding drugs. To make sure that the process remains open and fair, only authorized teachers should have the right to search lockers. The search should be carried out in such a way as not to embarrass students in front of others.
【小题1】What are .the two students talking about?

A.How to make sure schools are safe.
B.Whether there are crimes in schools.
C.Whether schools can search students’ lockers.
D.How to establish trust between teachers and students.
【小题2】The underlined word could be replaced by ___.
A.embarrassB.frightenC.worryD.challenge
【小题3】According to Elaine, school lockers ____.
A.are students’ personal property
B.should be changed into cupboards
C.are likely to hold some dangerous things
D.can be searched with students’ permission
【小题4】Which of the following would Ronald agree with?
A.Students won’t hide drugs in lockers.
B.Students use lockers but don’t own them.
C.Students should not put personal things in lockers.
D.Students may forbid teachers to inspect their lockers.

查看习题详情和答案>>

Elaine Yu Yee-nee, 15, Creative Secondary School
Lockers are designed in a way to hide their contents for a reason. Otherwise, they’d have open fronts like cupboards. Searching students’ lockers would be total invasion(侵犯) of privacy. Having a locker is more than having a place to store your stuff. A locker also gives you the freedom to keep certain things hidden. These can include harmless personal items like diaries, letters and photos. Searching lockers could discomfit students and others might make fun of them.
Yes, lockers are school property(财产). But that doesn’t give schools the right to inspect lockers as they please. While students are using lockers, they have the right to keep their contents private. Teachers could ask for permission to take a look inside a student’s locker and if the student is OK with that, then it would be fine. Searching students’ lockers without their permission would result in the loss of trust.
I doubt that students who have something dangerous to hide, such as weapons or drugs, would put them in their lockers. They would not want to risk being caught so easily.
Giving schools the right to search lockers would not help catch those who commit crimes. But it would certainly create an environment in which students would be embarrassed to have their belongings shown in public for no good reason.
Ronald Ling Pak-ki, 20, University of Hong Kong
Many students see their lockers as personal property. They would never agree that schools should have the right to inspect their lockers. But I think schools have an absolute right to do so.
It is the schools that actually own the lockers. Students just use them to store some of their things safely and conveniently. There are clear rules on what items students can and cannot keep in their lockers. Schools have both the duty and the right to check if students are following the rules.
I don’t think school authorities would decide to search a student’s locker unless they felt the need to do so. They might, for instance, suspect students of hiding drugs. To make sure that the process remains open and fair, only authorized teachers should have the right to search lockers. The search should be carried out in such a way as not to embarrass students in front of others

  1. 1.

    What are .the two students talking about?

    1. A.
      How to make sure schools are safe
    2. B.
      Whether there are crimes in schools
    3. C.
      Whether schools can search students’ lockers
    4. D.
      How to establish trust between teachers and students
  2. 2.

    The underlined word could be replaced by ___

    1. A.
      embarrass
    2. B.
      frighten
    3. C.
      worry
    4. D.
      challenge
  3. 3.

    According to Elaine, school lockers ____

    1. A.
      are students’ personal property
    2. B.
      should be changed into cupboards
    3. C.
      are likely to hold some dangerous things
    4. D.
      can be searched with students’ permission
  4. 4.

    Which of the following would Ronald agree with?

    1. A.
      Students won’t hide drugs in lockers
    2. B.
      Students use lockers but don’t own them
    3. C.
      Students should not put personal things in lockers
    4. D.
      Students may forbid teachers to inspect their lockers
查看习题详情和答案>>

Elaine Yu Yee-nee, 15, Creative Secondary School

Lockers are designed in a way to hide their contents for a reason. Otherwise, they’d have open fronts like cupboards. Searching students’ lockers would be total invasion(侵犯) of privacy. Having a locker is more than having a place to store your stuff. A locker also gives you the freedom to keep certain things hidden. These can include harmless personal items like diaries, letters and photos. Searching lockers could discomfit students and others might make fun of them.

Yes, lockers are school property(财产). But that doesn’t give schools the right to inspect lockers as they please. While students are using lockers, they have the right to keep their contents private. Teachers could ask for permission to take a look inside a student’s locker and if the student is OK with that, then it would be fine. Searching students’ lockers without their permission would result in the loss of trust.

I doubt that students who have something dangerous to hide, such as weapons or drugs, would put them in their lockers. They would not want to risk being caught so easily.

Giving schools the right to search lockers would not help catch those who commit crimes. But it would certainly create an environment in which students would be embarrassed to have their belongings shown in public for no good reason.

Ronald Ling Pak-ki, 20, University of Hong Kong

Many students see their lockers as personal property. They would never agree that schools should have the right to inspect their lockers. But I think schools have an absolute right to do so.

It is the schools that actually own the lockers. Students just use them to store some of their things safely and conveniently. There are clear rules on what items students can and cannot keep in their lockers. Schools have both the duty and the right to check if students are following the rules.

I don’t think school authorities would decide to search a student’s locker unless they felt the need to do so. They might, for instance, suspect students of hiding drugs. To make sure that the process remains open and fair, only authorized teachers should have the right to search lockers. The search should be carried out in such a way as not to embarrass students in front of others.

1.What are .the two students talking about?

A.How to make sure schools are safe.

B.Whether there are crimes in schools.

C.Whether schools can search students’ lockers.

D.How to establish trust between teachers and students.

2.The underlined word could be replaced by ___.

A.embarrass         B.frighten           C.worry            D.challenge

3.According to Elaine, school lockers ____.

A.are students’ personal property

B.should be changed into cupboards

C.are likely to hold some dangerous things

D.can be searched with students’ permission

4.Which of the following would Ronald agree with?

A.Students won’t hide drugs in lockers.

B.Students use lockers but don’t own them.

C.Students should not put personal things in lockers.

D.Students may forbid teachers to inspect their lockers.

 

查看习题详情和答案>>