题目内容
There have been few occasions on which I have actually walked out of the cinema halfway through a film.The first time this happened I was watching a story for children about animals living in a small village,riding in trains,shopping,and so on.The animals were all real.It was a sweet little film till you started wondering how these animals could act in such a human-1ike way and began to look for the wires and things that forced them to do so.The moment which had me walking out was a scene of a fox giving a hen a shampoo.The look on the animals’ faces and some signs of blood that appeared in the water were toothache for me;how many hens died to make that particular scene?
The other two occasions which I remember walking out were both when I had gone to see films that had appeared on some critics’ list of the ten best films.Neither of them was interesting at all.In one film the characters sat in a French country house,drinking and smoking and doing nothing except a little shooting.The other was about the life of a soldier in the First World War.It told me more about life in this period than I had any wish to know.For two out of ten films to be so uninteresting must show that critics love things of little interest;I’ve never been to see the other eight.
1.According to the passage,the writer______.
A.seldom goes to the cinema
B.seldom leaves the cinema halfway through a film
C.often goes to the cinema
D.often leaves the cinema halfway through a film
2.The writer did not like the film about life of a soldier in the First World War because______
A.it was too uninteresting to enjoy
B.he did not like war films
C.he had no interest in soldiers’ 1ife
D.this kind of films was rather cruel
3.On the other two occasions the writer______.
A.agreed with what film critics thought
B.thought that film critics were usually wrong
C.thought that film critics were usually right
D.thought in a way different from film critics
4.The passage mainly tells us______.
A.what films the writer liked and disliked
B.why the writer walked out of films
C.what the writer thought of film critics’ remarks
D.why the writer didn’t go to see the other eight films
BADB
Electric ears are dirty.In fact, not only are they dirty, they might even be more dirty than their gasoline-powered cousins.
People in California love to talk about "zero-emissions vehicles", but people in California seem to be clueless about where electricity comes from. Power plants mostly use fire to make it. Aside from the new folks who have their roofs covered with solar cells, we get our electricity from generators. Generators are fueled by something---usually coal, oil,but also by heat generated in nuclear power plants. There are a few wind farms and geothermal plants as well, but by far we get electricity mainly by burning something.
In other words, those "zero-emissions" cars are likely coal-burning cars. It's just because the coal is burned somewhere else that it looks clean. It is not. It's as if the California Greens are. covering their eyes---"If I can't see it, it's not happening." Gasoline is an incredibly efficient way to power a vehicle; a gallon of gas has a lot of energy in it.But when you take that gas (or another fuel) and first use it to make electricity, you waste a nice part of that energy, mostly in the form of wasted heat---at the generator, through the transmission lines, etc.
A gallon of gas may propel your car 25 miles. But the electricity you get from that gallon of gas won't get you nearly as far---so electric cars bum more fuel than gas-powered ones. If our electricity came mostly from nukes; or geothermal,or hydro, or solar, or wind,then an electric car truly would be clean. But for political, technical,and economic reasons,we don't use much of those energy sources.
In addition,electric cars' batteries which are poisonous for a long time will eventually end up in a landfill.And finally, When cars are the polluters, the pollution is spread across all the roads. When it's a power plant, though, all the junk is in one place. Nature is very good at cleaning up when things are too concentrated, but it takes a lot longer when all the garbage is in one spot.
【小题1】 What does "clueless" mean in paragraph 2?
A.People are seeing the California Greens everywhere. |
B.People in California love to talk about zero-emissions vehicles. |
C.People in California love to have their roofs covered with solar cells. |
D.People there have no idea that so far electricity mainly comes from burning |
【小题2】 What is the main idea of the passage?
A.Electric cars are not clean at all |
B.Electric cars are better than gasoline-powered ones. |
C.People cast doubts on electric cars' batteries. |
D.Gasoline is an efficient way to powera vehicle. |
A.not less than 25 miles | B.more than 25 miles |
C.no more than 25 miles | D.not more than 25 miles |
A.do not burn fuel and more environmentally-friendly |
B.are toxic because it is difficult for nature to clean it up when their batteries are buried in one spot. |
C.are very good at cleaning up when things are not too concentrated |
D.are poisonous for a long time and will eventually end up in a landfill |
A.being green is good and should be encouraged in communication |
B.electric cars are not clean in that we get electricity mainly by burning something |
C.zero-emissions vehicles should be chosen to protect our environment |
D.electric cars are now the dominant vehicle compared with gasoline-powered |