题目内容
LONDON—Here’s a new warning from health experts:Sitting is deadly.
Scientists are increasingly warning that sitting for long periods—even if you also exercise regularly—could be bad for your health.And it doesn’t matter where the sitting takes place—at the office,at school,in the car or before a computer or TV—just the overall number of hours it occurs.Several studies suggest people who spend most of their days sitting are more likely to be fat,have a heart attack or even die.
In an editorial published this week in the British Journal of Sports Medicine,Elin Ekblom?Bak of the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences suggested that authorities rethink how they define physical activity to highlight the dangers of sitting.
While health officials have issued guidelines recommending minimum amounts of physical activity,they haven’t suggested people try to limit how much time they spend in a seated position.
“After four hours of sitting,the body starts to send harmful signals,”said Ekblom?Bak.She explained that genes regulating(调节) the amount of glucose(葡萄糖) and fat in the body start to shut down.
Even for people who exercise,spending long periods of time sitting at a desk is still harmful.Tim Armstrong,a physical activity expert at the World Health Organization,said people who exercise every day—but still spend a lot of time sitting—might get more benefit if that exercise was spread across the day,rather than in a single bout(一回).
Still,in a study published in 2009 that tracked more than 17,000 Canadians for about a dozen years,researchers found people who sat more had a higher death risk,whether or not they exercised.
“We don’t have enough evidence yet to say how much sitting is bad,” said Peter Katzmarzyk of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge,who led the Canadian study.“But it seems the more you can get up and interrupt this sedentary behavior,the better.”
Figures from a U.S. survey in 2003?2004 found Americans spend more than half their time sitting,from working at their desks to sitting in cars.
Experts said more research is needed to figure out just how much sitting is dangerous,and what might be possible to offset those effects.
“People should keep exercising because that has a lot of benefits,” Ekblom?Bak said.“But when they’re in the office,they should try to interrupt sitting as often as possible,” she said.
1.What is the best title for the text?
A.Not Sitting Too Much While Working
B.How to Avoid Sitting Too Much
C.Sitting Too Much Could Be Deadly
D.More and More People Sit Too Much
2.According to the research,________.
A.the more time you spend in exercising in a single bout(一回),the healthier you will be
B.those who often sit too much are sure to grow fat or suffer from a heart attack
C.regular exercise is effective to get rid of the side effects of sitting too much
D.you had better not sit for more than four hours in a single bout
3.How does the danger of sitting too much affect the human body?
A.It results in a higher death risk.
B.It increases glucose and fat in the body.
C.It makes a person unable to exercise long enough in a day.
D.It causes the gene to fail to balance the glucose and fat in the body.
4.The underlined word “offset” in Paragraph 10 most probably means “________”.
A.improve? B.avoid
C.ignore? D.achieve
1.C
2.D
3.D
4.B
【解析】
1.
解析 标题归纳题。文章首先提出最新研究发现,即:久坐会致命。之后围绕该主题对研究进行介绍,并对此研究发现进行分析。故选C项。
2.2】 D
解析 推理判断题。根据第五段第一句“‘After four hours of sitting,the body starts to send harmful signals’...”可推断选D项。
3.3】 D
解析 细节理解题。根据第五段第二句“She explained that genes regulating(调节) the amount of glucose(葡萄糖) and fat in the body start to shut down.”可知,坐了四个小时后,身体会开始发出有害信号,此时调节体内葡萄糖和脂肪量的基因会停止工作,从而导致体内葡萄糖和脂肪量失衡。
4.4】 B
解析 词义猜测题。最后一段中艾克布洛姆?巴克的话是对“what might be possible to offset those effects”进行具体说明,即告诉人们如何避免久坐的不利影响,故选B项。
It came as something of a surprise when Diana, Princess of Wales, made a trip to Angola in 1997, to support the Red Cross’s campaign for a total ban on all anti-personnel landmines. Within hours of arriving in Angola television screens around the world were filled with images of her comforting victims injured in explosions caused by landmines. “I knew the statistics,” she said, “But putting a face to those figures brought the reality home to me; like when I met Sandra, a 13-year-old girl who had lost her leg, and people like her.”
The Princess concluded with a simple message: “We must stop landmines”. And she used every opportunity during her visit to repeat this message.
But, back in London, her views were not shared by some members of the British government, which refused to support a ban on these weapons. Angry politicians launched an attack on the Princess in the press. They described her as “very ill-informed” and a “loose cannon (乱放炮的人).”
The Princess responded by brushing aside the criticisms: “This is a distraction we do not need. All I’m trying to do is help.”
Opposition parties, the media and the public immediately voiced their support for the Princess. To make matters worse for the government, it soon emerged that the Princess’s trip had been approved by the Foreign Office, and that she was in fact very well-informed about both the situation in Angola and the British government’s policy regarding landmines. The result was a severe embarrassment for the government.
To try and limit the damage, the Foreign Secretary, Malcolm Rifkind, claimed that the Princess’s views on landmines were not very different from government policy, and that it was “working towards” a worldwide ban. The Defence Secretary, Michael Portillo, claimed the matter was “a misinterpretation or misunderstanding”.
For the Princess, the trip to this war-torn country was an excellent opportunity to use her popularity to show the world how much destruction and suffering landmines can cause. She said that the experience had also given her the chance to get closer to people and their problems.
【小题1】 Princess Diana paid a visit to Angola in 1997______.
A.to voice her support for a total ban of landmines. |
B.to clarify the British government’s stand on landmines. |
C.to investigate the sufferings of landmine victims. |
D.to establish her image as a friend of landmine victims. |
me” (Para.1)?
A.She just couldn’t bear to meet the landmine victims face to face. |
B.The actual situation in Angola made her feel like going back home. |
C.Meeting the landmine victims in person made her believe the statistics. |
D.Seeing the pain of the victims made her realize the seriousness of the situation. |
A.she was ill-informed of the government’s policy. |
B.they believed that she had misinterpreted the situation in Angola. |
C.she had not consulted the government before the visit. |
D.they were actually opposed to banning landmines. |
A.She made more appearances on TV. |
B.She paid no attention to them. |
C.She met the 13-year-old girl as planned. |
D.She rose to argue with her opponents. |
A.It had caused embarrassment to the British government. |
B.It had brought her closer to the ordinary people. |
C.It had greatly promoted her popularity. |
D.It had affected her relations with the British government. |