题目内容

Brenda Bongos was a happy, artistic girl. She had one big ambition—to play the drums in a band. But one big obstacle lay in her way. To be good enough to play in a band, Brenda had to practice a lot, but she lived next-door to a lot of old people. Many of them are sick. She knew that the sound of beating drums would really get on their nerves. So, she had tried playing in the strangest places: a basement, a kitchen, and even in a shower. But there was always someone it would annoy.

One day, while watching a science documentary on TV, she heard that sound cannot travel in space, because there’s no air. At that moment, Brenda Bongos decided to become a sort of musical astronaut.

With the help of a lot of time, books and work, Brenda built a space bubble. This was a big glass ball connected to a machine which sucked out all the air inside. All that would be left inside was a drum kit(成套设备) and a chair. Brenda got into the space suit she had made, entered the bubble, turned on the machine, and played those drums like a wild child.

It wasn’t long before Brenda Bongos came very famous. Many people came to see her play in her space bubble. Shortly afterwards she came out of the bubble and started giving concerts. Her fame spread so much that the government suggested that she be part of a unique space journey. Finally, Brenda was a real musical astronaut, and had gone far beyond her first ambition of playing drums in a band.

Years later, when asked how she had achieved all this, she thought for a moment, and said: “If those old people next – door hadn’t mattered so much to me, I wouldn’t have found a solution, and none of this would have ever happened.”

1.Why did Brenda try to play in the strangest places?

A.Because she didn’t want others to hear her play.

B.Because she didn’t want to disturb others.

C.Because she didn’t have a large house.

D.Because she liked to play in strange places.

2.Brenda started to give concerts _______ .

A.after she practiced in her space bubble

B.when she became part of the unique space journey

C.after she became a real musical astronaut

D.when people came to see her in the space bubble

3.Brenda became famous because _______ .

A.she made a space suit

B.she became a real musical astronaut

C.she played drums in her space bubble

D.she played drums in a band

4.Which of the following can be used to describe Brenda?

A.kind, hardworking and clever

B.brave, kind and hardworking

C.lovely, brave and kind

D.nervous, kind and clever

5.We can draw a conclusion from the passage that: “______”.

A.He laughs best who laughs last

B.It’s never too old to learn

C.Two heads are better than one

D.One good turn deserves another

 

【答案】

1.B

2.A

3.C

4.A

5.D

【解析】

试题分析:本文讲述了Brenda Bongos为了不让自己练习音乐影响到邻居的老人而发明了a space bubble,结果却让自己因此而出名。告诉我们好心有好报。

1.B 细节题。根据文章第一段3,4行Many of them are sick. She knew that the sound of beating drums would really get on their nerves. So, she had tried playing in the strangest places可知她的邻居都是一些有病的老人,她不想自己的练习影响他们的健康,故B正确。

2.A 细节题。根据文章倒数第二段第2行Shortly afterwards she came out of the bubble and started giving concerts.可知在e bubble里练习一段时间以后,她就出来演出了。故A正确。

3.C 细节题。根据文章第四段1,2行It wasn’t long before Brenda Bongos came very famous. Many people came to see her play in her space bubble.可知她是因为锻炼场所很奇怪而出名的。故C正确。

4.A 推理题。她不愿意自己的练习影响到老人,说明他很善良。她想出了如此巧妙的方法,说明她很聪明,她练习的很刻苦说明她很努力。故A正确。

5.D 总结归纳题。根据文章最后一段“If those old people next – door hadn’t mattered so much to me, I wouldn’t have found a solution, and none of this would have ever happened.可知如果她没有为老人考虑才想尽办法建a space bubble。那么她就不会有如此美好的个人事业。说明好心有好报。故D正确。

考点:考察故事类短文阅读

点评:本文讲述了Brenda Bongos为了不让自己练习音乐影响到邻居的老人而发明了a space bubble,结果却让自己因此而出名。告诉我们好心有好报。本文细节题居多,答题时在文章找到对应的地方,用笔进行标记,这有利于后期有时间检查时可以立刻找到答案的位置。仔细理解作者所讲的意思,再结合选项,通过排除法和自己对全文的把握,选出正确答案。

 

练习册系列答案
相关题目

Baby girls make their way directly for dolls as soon as they can crawl, while boys will head for the toy cars, a study has shown. The findings, the first to show differences in very young babies, suggest there is a biological(生物学的) basis to their preferences(偏爱).

Psychologists Dr. Brenda Todd from City University London carried out an experiment involving 90 infants(婴儿) aged nine months to 36 months. The babies were allowed to choose from seven toys. Some were stereotypically boys' toys - a car, a digger, a ball and a blue teddy.  The rest were girls’ toys: a pink teddy, a doll and a cooking set. They were placed a meter away from the toys, and could pick whichever toy they liked. Their choice and the amount of time they spent playing with each toy were recorded.

Of the youngest children (nine to 14 months), girls spent significantly longer playing with the doll than boys, and boys spent much more time with the car and ball than the girls did. Among the two-and three-year-olds, girls spent 50 percent of the time playing with the doll while only two boys briefly touched it. The boys spent almost 90 percent of their time playing with cars, which the girls barely touched. There was no link between the parents’ view on which toys were more appropriate for boys or girls, and the children’s choice.

Dr Brenda Todd said: “Children of this age are already exposed to much socialization(社会化). Boys may be given ‘toys that go’ while girls get toys they can care for, which may help shape their preference. But these findings agree with the former idea that children show natural interests in particular kinds of toys. There could be a biological basis for their choices. Males through evolution have been adapted to prefer moving objects, probably through hunting instincts(本能), while girls prefer warmer colours such as pink, the colour of a newborn baby.”

1.Baby boys and girls have different toy preferences probably because__________.    

A.baby boys are much more active

B.baby girls like bright colours more

C.there is a natural difference between them

D.their parents treat them differently

2.What can we infer from Paragraph 3?

A.Nine-month-old baby boys don’t play with dolls at all.

B.Two-year-old baby girls sometimes play with cars and balls.

C.Parents should teach their babies to share each other’s toys.

D.The older the babies are, the more obvious their preference is.

3.What conclusion did Dr. Brenda Todd draw from the results of the study?

A.Babies’ preference isn’t affected by social surroundings.

B.Adults purposely(故意地) influence their babies preference.

C.Baby boys preferring to moving toys will be good at hunting.

D.Baby girls preferring warmer colors will be warm-hearted.

4.We may read this article in a_________ section of a newspaper.

A.health            B.science           C.education         D.entertainment

 

Baby girls make their way directly for dolls as soon as they can crawl(爬), while boys will head for the toy cars, a study has shown. The findings, the first to show differences in very young babies, suggest there is a biological basis to their preferences.

Psychologists Dr. Brenda Todd from City University London carried out an experiment involving 90 infants aged nine months to 36 months. The babies were allowed to choose from seven toys. Some were typically boys' toys: a car, a digger, a ball and a blue teddy. The rest were girls’ toys: a pink teddy, a doll and a cooking set. They were placed a meter away from the toys, and could pick whichever toy they liked. Their choice and the amount of time they spent playing with each toy were recorded.

Of the youngest children (nine to 14 months), girls spent significantly longer playing with the doll than boys, and boys spent much more time with the car and ball than the girls did. Among the two-and three-year-olds, girls spent 50 percent of the time playing with the doll while only two boys briefly touched it. The boys spent almost 90 percent of their time playing with cars, which the girls barely touched. There was no link between the parents’ view on which toys were more suitable for boys or girls, and the children’s choice.

Dr. Brenda Todd said: “Children of this age are already exposed to much socialization. Boys may be given ‘toys that go’ while girls get toys they can care for, which may help shape their preference. But these findings agree with the former idea that children show natural interests in particular kinds of toys. There could be a biological basis for their choices. Males through evolution have been adapted to prefer moving objects, probably through hunting instincts(本能), while girls prefer warmer colors such as pink, the color of a newborn baby.”

1.Baby boys and girls have different toy preferences probably because         

A. baby boys are much more active

B. baby girls like bright colors more

C. there is a natural difference between them

D. their parents treat them differently

2.What can we infer from Paragraph 3 ?

    A. Nine-month-old baby boys don’t play with dolls at all.

    B. Two-year-old baby girls sometimes play with cars and balls.

    C. Parents should teach their babies to share each other’s toys.

    D. The older the babies are, the more obvious their preference is.

3.Both baby boys and baby girls like to play with _________ according to the study.

    A. a teddy         B. a car          C. a doll           D. a ball

4.We may read this article in a         section of a newspaper.

    A. health          B. science                             C. culture          D. entertainment

 

Baby girls make their way directly for dolls as soon as they can crawl, while boys will head for the toy cars,  a study has shown. The findings, the first to show differences in very young babies, suggest there is a biological basis to their preferences.

Psychologists Dr Brenda Todd from City University London carried out an experiment involving 90 infants aged nine months to 36 months. The babies were allowed to choose from seven toys. Some were stereotypically boys' toys - a car, a digger, a ball and a blue teddy.  The rest were girls’ toys: a pink teddy, a doll and a cooking set. They were placed a meter away from the toys, and could pick whichever toy they liked. Their choice and the amount of time they spent playing with each toy were recorded.

Of the youngest children (nine to 14 months), girls spent significantly longer playing with the doll than boys, and boys spent much more time with the car and ball than the girls did. Among the two-and three-year-olds, girls spent 50 percent of the time playing with the doll while only two boys briefly touched it. The boys spent almost 90 percent of their time playing with cars, which the girls barely touched. There was no link between the parents’ view on which toys were more appropriate for boys or girls, and the children’s choice.

Dr Brenda Todd said: “Children of this age are already exposed to much socialization. Boys may be given ‘toys that go’ while girls get toys they can care for, which may help shape their preference. But these findings agree with the former idea that children show natural interests in particular kinds of toys. There could be a biological basis for their choices. Males through evolution have been adapted to prefer moving objects, probably through hunting instincts(本能), while girls prefer warmer colors such as pink, the color of a newborn baby.”

1.Baby boys and girls have different toy preferences probably because         .

A.baby boys are much more active

B.baby girls like bright colors more

C.their parents treat them differently

D.there is a natural difference between them

2.Both baby boys and baby girls like to play with       according to the study.

A.a ball

B.a teddy

C.a car

D.a doll

3.What can we infer from Paragraph 3 ?

A.Nine-month-old baby boys don’t play with dolls at all.

B.Two-year-old baby girls sometimes play with cars and balls.

C.The older the babies are, the more obvious their preference is.

D.Parents should teach their babies to share each other’s toys.

4.What conclusion did Dr. Brenda Todd draw from the results of the study?

A.Adults purposely influence their babies preference.

B.Babies’ preference isn’t affected by social surroundings.

C.Baby boys preferring to moving toys will be good at hunting.

D.Baby girls preferring warmer colors will be warm-hearted.

5.We may read this article in a        section of a newspaper.

A.science

B.health

C.education

D.entertainment

 

 

     Have you seen Jurassic Park? In this film, scientists use DNA kept for tens of millions of years to clone dinosaurs. They find trouble, however, when they realize that the cloned creatures are smarter and more dangerous than expected. That’s nothing more than a fiction.

     But could we really clone endangered animals?

     To date, the most successful attempt to do so was the cloning of a gaur, a rare ox-like animal from southeast Asia. Scientists used a cow to bring the cloned baby gaur, named Noah. Two days after birth, however, Noah died from a common bacterial infection. Other endangered species that may be cloned include the African bongo antelope (邦戈羚羊), the Sumatran tiger, the cheetah (猎豹), and the giant panda.     Next, could we really clone extinct animals?

     In theory? Yes. To do this, you need a well-kept source of DNA from the extinct animals such as wool mammoth (毛象), Tasmanian tiger, or even dinosaur, and a closely related species, still living, which could serve as a surrogate mother.

     In reality? Probably not. On the one hand, it’s not likely that extinct animals’ DNA could survive undamaged for such a long time. Cloning extinct animals as wool mammoth, Tasmanian tiger, or dinosaur is much more difficult due to the lack of properly well-preserved DNA. On the other hand, for example, a gaur can have a cow as a surrogate mother, definitely not a monkey. But what about an extinct animals as unique as the panda? What species could possibly serve as a surrogate mother?

     Cloning presents many exciting possibilities. However, even if extinct animals are brought back, they could not survive in today’s world. Not only do most extinct animals have no habitat to love in, but the other plants and animals they depended on for food may also be gone as well.

1. It can be learned from the text that ________.

A. scientists have cloned the African bongo antelope

B. both the cheetah and the giant panda live in Asia

C. the gaur lives in Asia and is endangered 

D. the gaur is an extinct species

2. The underlined words “a surrogate mother” probably refer to a female who -----

A. contributes its eggs to another female   B. gives birth to a baby for another female

C. gives birth to a baby of its own        D. cannot give birth to a baby

3. The difficulty in cloning an extinct species is the lack of ______.

  A. both the well-preserved DNA and plants to live on

  B. both the habitat to live in and the well-preserved DNA

  C. both habitat to live in and plants to live on

  D. both the well-preserved DNA and a surrogate mother

4. In the author’s opinion, it is possible that ______.

  A. some extinct species may be cloned, but not survive

  B. extinct species may be cloned and easily survive

  C. a gaur can have a monkey as a surrogate mother

  D. all the extinct species may be cloned

5.Today , have scientists  cloned  dinosaus?

A .Yes    B .No    C .A lot  D.Only one.

 

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网