Question

4．How did it make you feel when you learned that KFC'S Beijing restaurants pulled three more items from their menus last week？There were fears that the items may have contained the cancer-causing coloring Sudan I．Do you have any desire to take the food provider to court because it feeds you something dangerous？
 After all，the law supposedly gives people the right to fight for their rights．But some experts have said it might not be so wise to take the company directly to court．
 Qiu Baochang，a lawyer in Beijing，suggested that consumers not take the company directly to court．"In addition to the high costs，consumers'complaints are unlikely to win unless they can prove they have had the banned dye （染料） at KFC，"-Qiu explained．
 One problem for those wanting to take action against the fast food chain is that few customers ask for or keep receipts（收据）．And，this must be the first step．
 If they can prove that their health has been damaged by KFC，they can accuse the company．But that would be almost impossible to do so because the Sudan I damage is a long-term effect and is not immediately apparent．
A KFC spokesperson said on Monday that the company was confident of being able to handle customers'complaints，"We will obey legal procedure if we receive any complaints．"
24．Why did KFC's Beijing restaurants pull three more items from their menus？B
A．Because the company was afraid to handle customers'complaints．
B．Because coloring Sudan I may have been contained in those items．
C．Because the KFC's restaurants were accused of selling poisonous food to the customers．
D．Because these items were no longer popular with the customers．
25．The reason why experts suggested not taking the company directly to court is thatD．
A．the costs will be high
B．consumers can't prove food contained Sudan I
C．consumers can't prove the food at KFC damaged their health
D．all of the above
26．This passage most probably appears inD．
A．a notice．
B．a book on cooking．
C．a story book．
D．a newspaper．
27．What is the general idea of the passage？A
A．That KFC's Beijing restaurants pulled three items from their menus last week．
B．How the consumers dealt with the KFC problem．
C．How KFC handled the customers'complaints．
D．That consumers never forget to ask for or keep receipts．

Answer 1

分析 本文讲述了快餐巨头KFC撤回可能含有致癌物质Sudan I 菜品的事，针对消费者受到的可能伤害，专家也给出了一定的建议，而KFC的相关人员也给出了明确的回应，会妥善处理顾客提出的投诉．

解答 24．B 细节理解题．根据文章第一段的第二句There were fears that the items may have contained the cancer-causing coloring Sudan I，答案为B，由于怕包含某项致癌物质．
25．D 综合理解题．根据以下语句In addition to the high costs，consumers'complaints are unlikely to win unless they can prove they have had the banned dye （染料） at KFC花费高，且必须拿出证据； If they can prove that their health has been damaged by KFC，they can accuse the company．But that would be almost impossible to do so because the Sudan I damage is a long-term effect and is not immediately apparent．不能证明该物质损害了身体，综上所述，答案D能概括不直接发起起诉的原因．
26．D 推理判断题．该文章说的食品安全问题，这是一个重要的话题，一般出现在报纸中进行报道，A、B、C三处均不符合实际，故D为正确选项．
27．A 主旨归纳题．文章开篇就提到KFC的撤回现有菜品的问题，而后围绕其进行了报道，故A能概括文章大意．

点评 本文是社会文化类阅读理解．做这类题材阅读理解时要求考生对文章通读一遍，做题时结合原文和题目有针对性的找出相关语句进行仔细分析，结合选项选出正确答案．推理判断题也是要在抓住关键句子的基础上合理的分析才能得出正确答案，切忌胡乱猜测，一定要做到有理有据．