阅读理解

  A bill passed by the U. S. Senate(参议院)shows that limiting student visas(签证)may affect the admission of international students at colleges across the nation. The bill was passed with an unanimous(一致) vote by the senate and now awaits President George W. Bush's approval before becoming law. The Congressional measure puts restrictions(限制)on visas to students from Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Sudan and North Korea countries. The bill does not restrict regular immigrants from those countries. The bill was put forward when it was discovered that one of the hijackers(劫机犯)had cane to the U. S. on a student visa. This man, who was not a national of any of the seven countries on the State Department list, never actually arrived on his college campus.

  John Pearson, Director of the International Center: background checks will be carried out for anyone from these countries. My hope is that there won't be a full-out denial of visas, just the background checks. The objective now is to reach a compromise (折中)whereby students from these countries won't be denied entry if they have undergone and passed sufficient background checks. It is unclear what the final process will be for determining visa issuance to students from the seven countries. There won't be a visa denial for students from these countries, the process will just take longer. I don't like this word-tracking system to report data on all foreign students. If the bill becomes law, universities will be asked to report foreign students not showing up for classes to immigration authorities.

  John Hennessy, University President: Since several departments accept a number of students from these countries, some of our programs will be significantly weakened if these students can no longer enter the country, The University will offer its support for students already here from these seven countries. We will, of course, try to continue to work with students here to ensure that they will be able to continue their studies.

1.The bill was passed to ________.

[  ]

A.refuse international students

B.check the background of international students

C.to turn down students from the seven countries

D.restrict students visas

2.The senate passed the bill with an unanimous vote because of ________.

[  ]

A.too many immigrants

B.Sept. 11th attack

C.too many international students

D.political reasons

3.What is the result of the bill?

[  ]

A.It will become law.

B.It is going to come into effect.

C.It will be denied.

D.The passage doesn't give us definite answer.

4.John Pearson thinks ________.

[  ]

A.all the students from the seven countries should not be given background checks

B.all the students from the seven countries should not be turned away

C.universities should report students not turning up for classes to the government

D.the bill is sure to become law

5.From what John Hennessy said, we can infer ________.

[  ]

A.there are some students from the seven countries in his university

B.they will help those students to continue their studies

C.they will suffer some loss if those students no longer cane

D.students from those countries will be sent back home

阅读理解

  If you can’t catch the bad guy, t’s game over-this is the rule of life for computer game players in cyber-world(网络世界).

  But similar thoughts might be worrying US President George W.ush as he prepares for election year with the world’s most wanted man still out of his reach.

  The hunt for Osama Bin Laden, eader of the AL-Qaida group, as been going on since the attack on New York’s World Trade Center on September 11,2001.Progress has been slow and, ith Democrat Senator John Kerry winning the race last Tuesday to challenge Bush in November’s presidential elections, he president needs results.f Osama Bin Laden can be caught before the presidential election, ush will gain an obvious advantage.

  The American public’s support for the war in Iraq has been falling, specially as the Bush government cannot find the banned weapons(武器)that it said were in the country.ut the way the president’s popularity rose following the capture(捕获)of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in December shows how useful it would be if Bin Laden could be caught.

  The latest polls suggest the election will be close, ith 48 per cent of Americans saying they will vote for Bush and 46 per cent backing Kerry.

  In order to capture the Saudi Arabia-born AL Qaida leader, housands of US soldiers were moved from Iraq to Afghanistan earlier this week.urther efforts have been made to strengthen Afghanistan’s border(边境)area with Pakistan, ith soldiers inspecting nearby villages more frequently than before.

  However, akistan has denied(否认)reports that US soldiers will be allowed to search for Bin Laden on its land.ush’s battles, oth at home and abroad, ill not be won easily.

(1)

Why does the writer mention the rule of life for computer game players in cyber-world?

[  ]

A.

Because catching Osama Bin Laden is another game.

B.

Because real life can be similar to life in cyber-world.

C.

Because this is also one of the rules in the American presidential election.

D.

Because a game like this has become a real life situation for Bush.

(2)

We can learn from the passage that Osama Bin Laden ________

[  ]

A.

was born in Afghanistan and lives in Saudi Arabia

B.

is sure to be captured since Saddam Hussein has been caught

C.

must be found so that 48% of the Americans will back Bush

D.

is probably hidden in the border area of Afghanistan and Pakistan

(3)

The underlined word “inspecting”(Paragraph 6)can be replaced by ________

[  ]

A.

seeking

B.

searching

C.

bombing

D.

visiting

(4)

It can be inferred from the passage that ________

[  ]

A.

the Bush government has great difficulty in seizing Bin Laden

B.

Kerry is more likely than Bush to win the coming presidential election

C.

more and more people are supporting the war in Iraq

D.

Pakistan will allow US soldiers to search for Bin Laden on its land

  The United Automobile Workers Union reached a tentative agreement with the Ford Motor Company early this morning after a 41-hour marathon bargaining session, completing a series of new contracts with the American auto companies.

  No details were released, but it is expected to resemble contracts reached earlier this fall for General Motors and Chrysler LLC.

  Unlike the G.M.and Chrysler contracts, the agreement at Ford was reached without a strike.Analysts say that Ford, which lost 12.6 billion last year, is the weakest of the Detroit auto companies.

  “Our bargaining committee came through for our active and retired members,”the U.A.W.'s president, Ron Gettelfinger, said in a statement.He said that its bargaining team had“encouraged Ford to invest in product and people while addressing the economic needs of our active and retired members.”

  “We face enormous challenges-and we also have enormous potential,”said U.A.W.Vice President Bob King, who directs the union's National Ford Department.“Our goals for this contract were to win new product and investment, to enhance(增强)job security and protect seniority-and we made progress in all these areas.”

  Any job guarantees will be closely examined by union members at Ford, who have watched G..M.and Chrysler cut jobs since their new contracts were reached.

  Ford had no immediate comment.Union leaders will review the contract next week, before it is presented to members for a vote.

  Bargainers began the latest round of talks at 10 a.m.Eastern time Thursday.The deal was reached at 3∶20 a.m.today, about two hours after most of the negotiators had been sent home.That left a small group to finalize the terms, people briefed on the negotiations said.The U.A.W.'s president, Ron Gettelfinger, participated in most of the final session.

  Ford shares rose more than 5 percent Friday, to 8.95, on news that a deal was close.

  Ford was the last of the three Detroit automakers without a new four-year labor contract.The previous deal expired Sept.14, but the company and the union had agreed to an indefinite extension.

  Some workers expressed hope that several of the plants whose future is in doubt can be saved by the new U.A.W.contract.But analysts say that if anything, Ford needs to cut costs faster.Ford has mortgaged most of its United States assets to raise cash, and executives say they do not expect the company to be profitable in North America until 2009.

  Ford's declining sales have raised expectations that the company will announce further job and spending cuts in the near future.Ford officials held off making the cuts while they completed negotiations with the U.A.W., but the company could make an announcement before the end of the year, a person involved in the planning said.

(1)

The passage is most probably taken from ________.

[  ]

A.

a textbook

B.

a newspaper

C.

an advertisement

D.

a magazine

(2)

How many auto companies are mentioned in the passage?

[  ]

A.

1

B.

2

C.

3

D.

4

(3)

One probable reason why there hasn't been a strike is that ________.

[  ]

A.

the U.A.W.'s president, Ron Gettelfinger, participated in most of the final session

B.

the contract hasn't been presented to members for a vote

C.

it's hoped that several plants can be saved by the U.A.W.contract

D.

Ford is not expected to be profitable in North America until 2009

(4)

The passage mainly tells about that ________.

[  ]

A.

auto companies have a tense relationship with the U.A.W.

B.

there is a severe competition among the auto companies in the US

C.

an agreement has been reached between Ford and the U.A.W.

D.

Ford is the weakest of the Detroit auto companies

(5)

Which of the statements is correct according to the passage?

[  ]

A.

Though Ford is not expected to be profitable in several years, it will not cut jobs and spending.

B.

The U.A.W.'s president is quite satisfied with the agreement.

C.

Many workers in Ford don't expect much of the new U.A.W.contract.

D.

The new contracts are the same as the ones reached earlier this fall for General Motors and Chrysler LLC.

阅读理解

  The sometimes tense relationship between presidents and New York City mayors was seemingly set 30 years ago with the famous Daily News headline following President Gerald R.Ford's decision not to help the city out from a financial crisis.(“Ford to City:Drop Dead,” it read.)

  But yesterday provided something of a role of the opposite:President Bush came to promote strong national economic data and to do it in the glow of a New York City economy that he said was “booming with a bond rating(债券评级)at an all-time high, and unemployment near an all-time low.”

  The moment highlighted the unique relationship Mr.Bush has with New York City, to which he has been linked since the 2001 terrorist attacks, even though he is unpopular with many voters here.

  And as he spoke at the Federal Hall National Memorial on Wall Street for an event held by the Association for a Better New York, he addressed an audience that included not only business leaders but also three New York City mayors-one of them a Republican, two of them Democrats.

  There was Mayor Michael R.Bloomberg, a late-blooming Republican, who kept his distance from the president throughout the 2005 mayoral campaign in case the president's low poll(选举投票)ratings rub off on him.

  Mr.Bloomberg seemed to receive slightly louder applause than Mr.Bush did yesterday, though, to be fair, both were warmly received and many of Mr.Bloomberg's own officials were in the audience.

  But Mr.Bush did not seem to take offense either way.

  “Mr.Mayor, thanks for being here, I appreciate your coming,” Mr.Bush told Mr.Bloomberg.“You're doing what people want you to do, and that is to lead this city.”

  Then there was former Mayor David N.Dinkins, the liberal Democrat.“Mr.Mayor-David Dinkins, thank you for being here,” Mr.Bush said from the lectern.“Proud you're here.”

  His warmest words were for Mayor Edward I.Koch, the Democrat who crossed party lines to endorse Mr.Bush in 2004.

  “And it's good to see my buddy(密友), Mayor Ed Koch,” Mr.Bush said.“Mr.Mayor, thank you for coming.”

  One former mayor who was not there:Rudolph W.Giuliani, the man at or near the top of many polls of possible Republican presidential contenders(竞争者), who, according to an aide, was at tending a fund-raiser out of town.

(1)

How many New York City mayors are mentioned in the passage?

[  ]

A.

Two.

B.

Three.

C.

Four.

D.

Five.

(2)

According to the passage, what was the cause of the tense relationship between President Ford and New York City mayors?

[  ]

A.

The misleading of the famous Daily News.

B.

His decision not to help the city out from a financial crisis.

C.

His refusal to promote strong national economic data.

D.

His often attending fund-raisers.

(3)

What was the attitude of the New York voters towards Mr.Bush?

[  ]

A.

They all supported him and voted for him.

B.

All of them did not vote for him.

C.

They received him as they had done to Mr.Ford.

D.

He was unpopular with them.

(4)

Why did Mr.Bloomberg receive slightly louder applause than Mr.Bush at the Federal Hall National Memorial?

[  ]

A.

Because Mr.Bush was not warmly received by the audience.

B.

Because Mr.Bush had seldom visited City before.

C.

Because Mr.Bloomberg was one of the possible Republican presidential contenders.

D.

Because many of Mr.Bloomberg's own officials were in the audience.

(5)

What is the best title for the passage?

[  ]

A.

Ford's Tragedy in City.

B.

Mayors in New York.

C.

Bush Has 3 Mayors to Thank in City.

D.

Booming of City's Economy.

On the 36th day after they had voted, Americans finally learned Wednesday who would be their next president: Governor George W. Bush of Texas.

Vice President Al Gore, his last realistic avenue for legal challenge closed by a U. S. Supreme Court decision late Tuesday, planned to end the contest formally in a televised evening speech of perhaps 10 minutes, advisers said.

They said that Senator Joseph Lieberman, his vice presidential running mate, would first make brief comments. The men would speak from a ceremonial chamber of the Old Executive office Building, to the west of the White House.

The dozens of political workers and lawyers who had helped lead Mr. Gore’s unprecedented fight to claw a come-from-behind electoral victory in the pivotal state of Florida were thanked Wednesday and asked to stand down.

“The vice president has directed the recount committee to suspend activities,” William Daley, the Gore campaign chairman, said in a written statement.

Mr. Gore authorized that statement after meeting with his wife, Tipper, and with top advisers including Mr. Daley.

He was expected to telephone Mr. Bush during the day. The Bush campaign kept a low profile and moved gingerly, as if to leave space for Mr. Gore to contemplate his next steps.

Yet, at the end of a trying and tumultuous process that had focused world attention on sleepless vote counters across Florida, and on courtrooms form Miami to Tallahassee to Atlanta to Washington the Texas governor was set to become the 43d U. S. president.

The news of Mr. Gore’s plans followed the longest and most rancorous dispute over a U. S. presidential election in more than a century, one certain to leave scars in a badly divided country.

It was a bitter ending for Mr. Gore, who had outpolled Mr. Bush nationwide by some 300000 votes, but, without Florida, fell short in the Electoral College by 271votes to 267—the narrowest Electoral College victory since the turbulent election of 1876.

Mr. Gore was said to be distressed by what he and many Democratic activists felt was a partisan decision from the nation’s highest court.

The 5-to –4 decision of the Supreme Court held, in essence, that while a vote recount in Florida could be conducted in legal and constitutional fashion, as Mr. Gore had sought, this could not be done by the Dec. 12 deadline for states to select their presidential electors.

James Baker 3rd, the former secretary of state who represented Mr. Bush in the Florida dispute, issued a short statement after the U. S. high court ruling, saying that the governor was “very pleased and gratified.”

Mr. Bush was planning a nationwide speech aimed at trying to begin to heal the country’s deep, aching and varied divisions. He then was expected to meet with congressional leaders, including Democrats. Dick Cheney, Mr. Bush’s ruing mate, was meeting with congressmen Wednesday in Washington.

When Mr. Bush, who is 54, is sworn into office on Jan.20, he will be only the second son of  a president to follow his father to the White House, after John Adams and John Quincy Adams in the early 19th century.

Mr. Gore, in his speech, was expected to thank his supporters, defend his hive-week battle as an effort to ensure, as a matter of principle, that every vote be counted, and call for the nation to join behind the new president. He was described by an aide as “resolved and resigned.”

While some constitutional experts had said they believed states could present electors as late as Dec. 18, the U. S. high court made clear that it saw no such leeway.

The U.S. high court sent back “for revision” to the Florida court its order allowing recounts but made clear that for all practical purposes the election was over.

In its unsigned main opinion, the court declared, “The recount process, in its features here described, is inconsistent with the minimum procedures necessary to protect the fundamental right of each voter.”

That decision, by a court fractured along philosophical lines, left one liberal justice charging that the high court’s proceedings bore a political taint.

Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in an angry dissent:” Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the law.”

But at the end of five seemingly endless weeks, during which the physical, legal and constitutional machines of the U. S. election were pressed and sorely tested in ways unseen in more than a century, the system finally produced a result, and one most Americans appeared to be willing at lease provisionally to support.

The Bush team welcomed the news with an outward show of restraint and aplomb. The governor’s hopes had risen and fallen so many times since Election night, and the legal warriors of each side suffered through so many dramatic reversals, that there was little energy left for celebration.

The main idea of this passage is

[A]. Bush’s victory in presidential election bore a political taint.

[B]. The process of the American presidential election.

[C]. The Supreme Court plays a very important part in the presidential election.

[D]. Gore is distressed.

     What does the sentence “as if to leave space for Mr. Gore to contemplate his next step” mean

[A]. Bush hopes Gore to join his administration.

[B]. Bush hopes Gore to concede defeat and to support him.

[C]. Bush hopes Gore to congraduate him.

[D]. Bush hopes Gore go on fighting with him.

     Why couldn’t Mr. Gore win the presidential election after he outpolled Mr. Bush in the popular vote? Because

[A]. the American president is decided by the supreme court’s decision.

[B]. people can’t directly elect their president.

[C]. the American president is elected by a slate of presidential electors.

[D]. the people of each state support Mr. Bush.

     What was the result of the 5—4 decision of the supreme court?

[A]. It was in fact for the vote recount.

[B]. It had nothing to do with the presidential election.

[C]. It decided the fate of the winner.

[D]. It was in essence against the vote recount.

     What did the “turbulent election of 1876” imply?

[A]. The process of presidential election of 2000 was the same as that.

[B]. There were great similarities between the two presidential elections (2000 and 1876).

[C]. It was compared to presidential election of 2000.

[D]. It was given an example.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网